Print button

InPrint: News

Editing the bestsellers and trend-spotting

The SYP’s final speaker meeting of 2009 focused on a skill that many young publishers would hope to cultivate – commissioning books that become bestsellers. But can an editor learn to spot trends and commission sure-fire money-makers?
 

Our speakers for the evening were Antonia Hodgson, Editor-in-Chief of the commercial division at Little, Brown Book Group, Jon Wood, Deputy Publisher at Orion Books, and Suzanne Baboneau, Publishing Director of the adult trade division at Simon & Schuster UK.

To start the evening, each speaker told the audience a little about how they got where they are today.
 
Antonia got into publishing in 1990. ‘There was no such thing as work experience then,’ she told us. ‘I had a sister who worked at Little, Brown. I went in to help her out, and I was offered a job there. I worked as an assistant before I went to university, then at a medical publisher for a bit after I graduated. Then I went back to Little, Brown as an editorial assistant, and worked my way up there. I never moved from the company I was in, because it’s a big company, with lots of different imprints. I was there at the right time, and I was lucky. Hence the eclectic list I’ve worked on – I’ve been able to create bestsellers, work in a company I know really well, and stick to things I like. When I’m looking at new work, I ask myself whether I like the voice, whether it’s a strong voice, and then I look at the market. I think I hit my stride in terms on feeling confident about what I was looking for about five years in.’
 
Jon Wood started his career in publishing in 1994, ‘when work experience did exist, though in my case there was an element of nepotism! My father created audio books, and he managed to get me work experience at Hodder & Stoughton for two months. They told me to forget editorial, there were no jobs. But they were looking for a part-time sales rep for six months, so I did that, and then got the job full-time. I ended up doing the job for four years. I still wanted to be an editor though, so I spent a lot of time giving readers reports. At that time, publishing was a very static industry, which let talent get away. There weren’t many editors. Then, the crime and thrillers editor left, and they couldn’t replace him. I volunteered myself for the job to the MD at a party, got an interview, got the job on probation, and got a job! I did it for two years, during which time I bought nothing that worked. I did buy Harlen Coben, but unfortunately it didn’t work at that time!
 
‘I was then recommended for a job at Orion, as I’d done good work on the backlist at Hodder. Harlen Coben was my first success there. Life gets easier after your first hit; people start to rate you. I then had success with RJ Ellory, and eventually worked my way up to running the fiction department.’
 
Suzanne Baboneau, Publishing Director of the adult trade division at Simon & Schuster, has been working in publishing for 30 years. ‘I still have moments when I don’t know what I’m doing!’ she confided. ‘I started in 1980. I did a French degree, rather than an English Literature degree. I came to London and learnt French shorthand and typing. I then had an interview at Pan Macmillan. I could start immediately, so I got the job. It was an amazing place. We had people like Wilbur Smith and Dick Francis. It was a big, mass-market publisher. I was a secretary for three years, and I mostly read in that time. It’s a good idea to build up a portfolio of authors who you’re read. I also spent a lot of time writing reader’s reports.
 
‘Then I moved to Hamish Hamilton for two years – it wasn’t part of Penguin at that point. We produced hardbacks, so it was very different, quite a rarefied environment. It wasn’t a linear process; we were buying from other publishers. It was very different in those days. Then I went back to Pan. My boss could spot a bestseller a mile off, it was uncanny. He moved to Knopf, so I went with him for a couple of months, but I decided that I preferred British publishing – they have a different way of approaching the publishing process.
 
‘I moved back to Pan around the time that vertical publishing started in 1987, and I became assistant fiction editor. I didn’t start commissioning for seven years. I was lucky, I had great mentors and the time to read and report, and I’m still using what I learnt then now. I would council have patience, build up your knowledge, learn, build a foundation. I stayed there for 15 years, and eventually became editorial director of fiction at Pan Macmillan. In 2000, my boss moved to S&S, and I followed six months later. At that time S&S was a poor cousin to S&S US, so we had to work hard to build it up into what it is now. I’ve been there for the past ten years, and I think it’s getting harder to spot the next bestseller, things change for one day to the next.’
 
Our speakers then moved on to talk about spotting trends and bestsellers. Jon pointed out that a lot of the most successful authors today break through late in their career, so you have to have patience. ‘Writers take time to find their voice. Unfortunately, you often don’t have the time for this these days – there’s a lot of pressure to make an author work within three or four books.’
 
Suzanne mentioned that ‘you have to have belief, editorially, even when a successful author has a new breakthrough’, and Antonia told us that ‘mentors are very important; you can learn a lot from them. We work in an open plan office, so there’s more connection between the junior and senior staff, which I think was lost with email. Personal relationships are very important. It’s about who you know, and working with like-minded people.’
 
Jon agreed, and added, ‘it’s hard to over-state how important the editorial department is – you have to create excitement. It can be frustrating. Only 16­­–20 per cent of books make any money. As an editor, you have to make stories of your own, creating narratives of authors’ lives, making other departments excited, or letting writers write and learn.’
 
Suzanne spoke of the importance of editorial distance when buying books. ‘You have to follow the process a book will go through. Even if you love something, you have to be subjective. You have to have a combination of gut instinct followed by a cool head.’
 
Antonia moved on to talk a little about trend-spotting, stating that ‘the concept is a dodgy one, depending on what is meant by it. You shouldn’t be thinking of what you want before you read it. It’s not like fashion, it’s not a new thing every season, though there are genres that come and go, such as misery memoirs. You have to look for a great story, and then think about the market. Trying to guess the zeitgeist is impossible. The ideal scenario is to have lots of editors with different tastes and diverse backgrounds, all looking for different stories.’
 
Jon added, ‘we’re under a lot of pressure from sales and marketing to publish in genres that are tightly defined and doing well at the moment, but editors are looking for something that stands out. The perfect book is one that fits a genre and can be packaged, but does something different with it, for example, Harlen Coben, who took the thriller into the home, which meant that women were starting to read more crime thrillers.
                       
‘I’d offer three rules:
1.     Don’t buy something you don’t love, even if you think it’ll sell.
2.     Don’t buy too many things that are brilliant but you know won’t sell.
3.     Buy authors not books – everyone wants a repeating author.’
 
On the subject of judging a potential book from a proposal, Antonia mentioned that she works on a lot of non-fiction – ‘you can judge very quickly from a proposal. There are publishers who can see books and publish them even if they don’t love it, but the question is, is it fulfilling?’
 
Suzanne continued, ‘I often ask myself whether I’d recognise Dan Brown if it had been submitted to me. I think probably not. What is it that makes that book work? You do need a mix of people and backgrounds, then the process joins in a full circle.’
 
In relation to what makes a good commissioning editor, Antonia mentioned the recent Ebury ad, which advertised for a commissioning editor but said that editorial experience wasn’t necessary. ‘It caused a lot of controversy, but I think it’s good to open the commissioning process to other experiences.’
 
‘It’s important to bring editorial assistants through the career process. The situation is better now than it used to be though,’ Jon stated.
 
The evening concluded with questions from the audience to the panel.
 
Q: How easy is it to move from other departments into editorial, or is where you start off where you end up?
 
Jon: It is difficult, but it is possible. You need the balance between enthusiasm and aggression.
 
Antonia: Don’t rely on what you think you want to do, it’s about having fun.
 
Suzanne: We tend to forget that everyone who works in publishing is a reader and has an opinion. Use people more as readers.
 
Jon: It’s all about creating momentum. You need to get as many people as possible involved.
 
Q: How closely do you work with literary agents to find talent?
 
Suzanne: There are so many, you have to be aware of trends. You could sit at a desk and wait for it to come in, but there’s nothing to stop people pursuing their own leads, especially in non-fiction. We had to struggle at S&S to become one of the publishers of choice for literary agents. Lots of people go from publishing into agenting, but not vice versa – there’s more money in agenting!
 
Jon: It’s important to find agents that share your tastes, who you have a track record with. The friends you make early on can be very important.
 
Suzanne: You can tell when agents are very passionate. You can’t get to know everyone. Certain agents can be used as a calling a card to supermarkets.
 
Q: How important is timing during the year?
 
Jon: There’s a real science to it. It all depends on the format and the type of book. If an author is at the beginning of their career, then you’d usually publish in the spring. The ultimate aim with hardbacks is to go to autumn and Christmas. But if you go to autumn too early, the book will drown. It’s different for mass market books, when the big time is the summer read. You can calculate from week to week what top tens sell. You want to get in there for at least one week, and you can go to buyers with this. We have a key title schedule.
 
Suzanne: When we got wind of Dan Brown, we were about to publish Phillipa Gregory in the US, so we moved it forward two weeks and got her to number 1 before Dan Brown came out. Sales directors often share information like this.
 
Jon: You have to work to a two week cycle – supermarkets change their runs every two weeks.
 
Suzanne: At the end of December, very few paperbacks come up. You have to look at important dates that are coming up, like the world cup, the Olympics, valentines day, and so on. You have to always be asking questions, even about brand authors. For certain authors, you have to have a month. Though of course this depends on deliveries.
 
Q: How much of commissioning strategy is based on sales figures?
 
Antonia: We have BookScan now, which has only been available for the last eight years. It’s pretty accurate now. There are still books that go missing, though it has become more and more relevant. When I first started, there was no real way of telling how an author was doing. Everyone can look now. It’s brutal for some authors – their sales might be tailing off, and you have to use editorial judgement to determine whether you think their new book will break through.
 
Jon: You have to question the publishing of previous books, the cover, marketing strategy etc. Agents are obsessed with Amazon ratings.
 
Antonia: In non-fiction, it is easier to predict, as you can look at the sales on a particular topic, and can see the core sales. You would hope that sales figures alone wouldn’t prevent an editor from acquiring a great book, but it lets you judge what level to go in at.
 
Q: After you buy a book and the text is delivered, how much work is needed?
 
Suzanne: Every author needs work. Some agents do loads of editing first; others just love to do the deal. It varies loads. Some need hand-holding and confidence building.
 
Jon: Don’t expect to edit in the office – it’ll be at weekends and evenings. It’s impossible to edit in an office environment. Everything interfaces with editorial, so you’re too busy.
 
Suzanne: You can’t teach to edit, you just learn it and pick things up.
 
Antonia: There are different ways of editing, and they’re all valid.
 
Q: How do you cope with difficult authors?
 
Antonia: You know you’ve gone the right route when an author knows already that something is wrong. At commissioning stage, if I sense an author is going to be difficult, I would back away.
 
Suzanne: I find it’s better to talk face to face. Email is efficient and quick, but impersonal. The author has to have confidence in you. Celebrity fiction is a particular problem, as these people have day jobs. It’s important to remember it’s their book, and not to be too heavy handed. Agents come into their own if it gets too sticky.
 
Jon: It’s surprisingly rare. Writing is a lonely process, so they’re mostly glad to have someone to talk to.
 
Antonia: I’d recommend always starting with the positives.
 
Q: Do you have any advice for people who don’t live in London who want to get into publishing?
 
Suzanne: It is true that publishing is very London-centric.
 
Antonia: It is a problem; it’s really challenging, especially to diversity. I’d say get a job in anything to do with publishing so you can get a place to live, though admittedly it’s difficult in a recession.
 
03 February 2010

InPrint: News

Why is the publishing community so dismissive of Dan Brown?

Over the last six months, whenever I’ve heard publishers discuss Dan Brown, it’s usually been in quite a negative tone.  This is something that I’ve found quite surprising, since he is one of the bestselling authors of all time.  Indeed, he’s the bestselling author of adult fiction (no, not the dirty kind, although Robert Langdon and Vittoria Vetra did get up to some tantric sex in Angels and Demons).  He would be the bestselling novelist of all time, if it weren’t for Harry Potter and his shenanigans. Yet we pay him no respect for this achievement.
  It’s not just publishers (apart from Random House) who don’t like Dan Brown.  Independent booksellers don’t seem too enamoured of him either.  Indeed, when The Lost Symbol was published, the blog of the Crow on the Hill bookshop offered all purchasers of the novel a free present: wrapping paper that had “shit present” written all over it.  However, it’s not Dan Brown’s fault that such independent bookshops wouldn’t be able to make any profit from the novel, due the loss-leading discounts that the other major retailers placed upon The Lost Symbol.
  One could very well argue that the Bookseller Crow’s opinion was justified, that Dan Brown just got very lucky with The Da Vinci Code, because all the readers were fascinated by the concept of Jesus’ supposed marriage to Mary Magdalene and the resulting bloodline, and that the rest of the plot was negligible in comparison.  However, I’ve just re-read The Da Vinci Code, and my opinion is that it is a classic, albeit a slightly flawed one.  In many readers’ opinions, Angels and Demons is Dan Brown’s best novel, although I must admit that its silly pyrotechnics do leave me somewhat cold.
  So, why was I re-reading The Da Vinci Code?  Well, for one thing, I like to be contrary, and thought that there was a case for producing an argument in defence of Dan Brown.  For instance, I’d been unconvinced of J. K. Rowling’s merits until I’d read the 3rd Harry Potter, the sublime Prisoner of Azkaban, and thought that Dan Brown would be worth the benefit of the doubt.  I’ve also just started a new paperback imprint, and so thought it would be a good idea to study the methods of the bestselling adult fiction author of the day to see if I could learn anything.  So, I decided to publish a guide to Dan Brown’s latest novel, The Lost Symbol, and boy, did I learn a lot!  It took more than two month’s full time research to produce Punked Books’ Dan Brown’s The Lost Symbol: The Ultimate Unauthorized and Independent Reading Guide (ISBN 9780953317226), written under the pseudonym ‘Alex Carmine’.  This was mainly due to the fact that Dan Brown did several years of research in writing the novel, a great proportion of which ended up in the text, since Robert Langdon is a university lecturer in his day job.  The fact that Langdon’s a teacher is a great device that Dan Brown utilises well in his novels, since he can always interrupt the narrative with a flashback to a lecture that explains important concepts, with his students asking the obvious questions.  In this way, Dan Brown gets away from the need for Langdon to have a dumb companion to explain everything to.  Indeed, most of Langdon’s companions have skills that are equivalent to his, which allow them to discuss concepts at a more advanced level than his students.  It also helps that Langdon is, like us, quite sceptical about the more outlandish worldviews of his companions (such as Katherine Solomon’s faith in the frankly weird field of Noetic Science). 
  Dan Brown is often accused of being a poor prose writer, which is curious, since he used to be a teacher of creative writing.  It’s true that his prose can sometimes jar: on the other hand, it’s not as terrible as its commonly accused of being.  Dan Brown often seems to be regarded as a lowest common denominator writer, but there are parts of The Lost Symbol that exhibit great subtlety, such as the quotation of Milton’s Paradise Lost in the novel, which makes most sense for readers who bother to have a look at this reference in more detail.  Indeed, there are several other examples where Dan Brown makes classical allusions in this way, and appears to adopt the devices of more literary novelists.  It could be argued that Dan Brown has reacted against the accusations of ‘dumbness’ by producing a novel that perhaps strains a bit too much to be highbrow (the long discussions about Noetic science at the end of the book aren’t all that enthralling).  Since this is his first novel since The Da Vinci Code, it’s inevitable that Dan Brown would have been affected by the trials and tribulations of his success.  For instance, Joseph Campbell’s concept of the hero’s journey, which was so enthusiastically adopted by George Lucas in the production of some of the best blockbuster movies from Dan Brown’s youth, would very much appear to have influenced Dan Brown in the writing of The Lost Symbol, especially since this is the first book of his that he knew would be filmed.  There’s also a delightful perversity in Dan Brown’s rendition of the traditional fable of the young hero son who dares to take on his dark, forbidding father within The Lost Symbol, which I explain in more depth with Dan Brown's "The Lost Symbol" the Ultimate Unauthorized and Independent Reading Guide (which you can find via Google Books below).  Having done so much work on The Lost Symbol, I’m convinced that although it may be slightly flawed, there is enough of quality within it to gradually eclipse The Da Vinci Code.  I am sure that it will be one day recognised as being Dan Brown’s most mature work.

Kevin Mahoney

27 January 2010

InPrint: News

SYP Author Showcase

The penultimate London speaker meeting of the SYP’s 60th year took place in Foyle’s gallery. The event was a showcase of some of the best of today’s award winning authors across fiction, non-fiction and children’s publishing.
 
RJ Ellory was the first to take to the floor.  He is the author of seven published novels, including A Quiet Belief in Angels which was a Richard & Judy Book Club selection in 2008 and was shortlisted for the American Barry Award for Best British Crime Fiction, amongst various others awards. His novels have been translated into 19 additional languages.
 
‘A foolish business to get into’ was Roger’s opening description of the publishing industry. Born in Birmingham in 1965, Roger’s background story is tragic in nature. His dad left when he was very young and he has no memory of him as such. His mother died of a brain haemorraghe aged seven and he was then sent to an orphanage where, upon discovering the library there, he began his life long passion for American literature.  After this he returned to Birmingham where he attended Art College. Thiswas cut short however, by the death of his grandmother. It was when his brother nearly died of a drug overdose that he decided to start studying drug therapy. This was an industry that he stayed in, right through until two years ago.
                                             
When asked by an audience member if he had drawn on his sad childhood for his work, Roger explained that he never considered his childhood as being a particularly sad one.  The four main things he remembers from his childhood are cross-country, reading, table-tennis and being hungry. None of his work is autobiographical.
 
It was upon coming across a friend who was reading It by Stephen King that he realised that he wanted to be a writer. He watched his friend do nothing but read this book for days on end, ignoring everyone around him.  His friend’s explanation was that he simply could not put it down. It was the idea of being able to create something like this that had this much of an effect on another human that inspired Roger to start writing.
 
Roger was an extremely prolific writer. He started his first novel in 1987 and wrote 22 books between then and 1993. At this point he stopped, after tirelessly doing all he could have to get his work published. His stories of countless rejection letters and agents who emigrated, or just stopped phoning him, was a stark reminder of just how hard it is for authors to get their work noticed in the publishing industry. The problem that UK publishers had with his writing was that they would not be able to sell a British author writing American fiction. Their advice was to send his work to American publishers. Unfortunately American publishers said the same thing.
 
Having become disheartened by the experience, it was six years before Roger started to write again. Despite the frustration of trying to get his work published he realised that writing was all he had ever wanted to do. He made 35 copies of the next book he wrote and sent it off to 35 publishers. The only publishers not to return it were Bloomsbury. Not expecting any results, he phoned them to get his copy back. He was told that they had sent him a very complimentary letter about the book, which he had not received. He ended up couriering another copy to them. This ended up at Orion in the hands of John Wood.
 
John tried to call Roger to explain he loved the book and wanted to publish it. However, he could not get to speak to Roger and kept catching his wife instead. Unfortunately she did not pass the messages on, certain it must be a hoax. In the end John had to write a letter. Luckily, Roger received this one and phoned back. John explained in order to get the book published he had to get 11 people to read it and a decision would be made at the next editorial board meeting in ten days time.  It took four months for the majority to read it apart from John’s boss who said he would need another two weeks at this stage. Determined not to make Roger wait any longer, John took out his credit card and said if they did not accept it there and then, he would pay the advance on his credit card and publish it privately. Orion did end up publishing the book. Candlemoth has since been translated into German, Dutch and Italian and is due to be translated into numerous other languages. He has published seven books with Orion, all of which have been a huge success.
 
Roger told us more about what it is that he is aiming to do when he writes a book. Right from the start he was driven to write one of those books that people can’t put down.  Roger spoke of what he thought of as the three categories of fiction. There are books that are mainly driven by the plot. There are then those he thinks of as ‘literary fiction’. These are the ones where the author has spent as much time on the language as he has on the story line. An example of one of these might be Annie Proulx’s The Shipping News. The third type of book is the one where the narrative and storyline are equally as compelling as the language used. These are the type of books  Roger believes are the ones that people will read again and again. These are the ones that make people ‘book-lovers’; books that define identities. The most important thing for Roger is how his writing makes the reader feel. Powerful fiction engages us emotionally and that is his constant aim throughout his writing.
 
The  next author to speak was Marcus Sedgwick. He also started by giving us a potted history of his life, describing it as free-therapy. Before becoming a bestselling author, Marcus worked in children’s publishing – a very fluffy environment is how he remembers this area of the industry.
                                                                                                                                                                      
Marcus said he never really had an inclination of what he wanted to do as a child. Well, this is not strictly true. He did have a strong desire to be a cat burglar (strangely this met with much enthusiasm from Roger in the audience who revealed this was also his childhood dream). However, he soon realised this was not a viable option and went to university and studied maths, changing his degree to politics after a year.
 

Like many such things, Marcus realised he wanted to be a children’s writer while working in a book shop. He describes the experience of working in a bookshop as a positive one. In terms of it being a kind of precedent to a career in publishing/writing, it gives a great grounding in the industry. It is inspiring seeing the quality of books being published and gives you a high exposure to a lot of what is out there. It was this exposure though, that also made him realise that a lot of what was being published was not of that high a quality and made him consider that he could perhaps do better himself.

His next job was as a travelling salesman in books. Marcus described this as the perfect job for an aspiring writer – a job where you are not doing the actual job for 80-90% of the time left him with plenty of time to sit with his laptop in a car coming up with ideas. The first book he wrote was, by his own admission, a bit ‘rubbish’ - a sci-fi of sorts, involving a teleporter. He sent this to Egmont who, while not accepting it, did give some encouraging feebback. He then wrote two more books, after which he got an agent. She did not publish these two books however. It was a short story that he wrote for an anthology that got him his big break. Whilst it was not accepted for the anthology Orion picked up on it and commissioned him to turn it in to a full book.

Throughout most of his writing career Marcus has also had quite a few jobs in publishing. Marcus advised to always try and get a role in a smaller publishers when starting out as there is much more opportunity to learn about all aspects of the business and get involved at different levels.  Throughout his career he moved up to UK sales rep at Walker Books. Last year he quit this role in July and is now able to write full time.  To be able to give up the day job was always his goal - in the end Marcus felt it had become too difficult to write and keep up the day job at the same time.
 
Marcus’ books have been shortlisted for many awards. Blood Red, Snow White – a fairy tale/spy thriller/love story set during the Russian Revolution – was shortlisted for the Costa Award. He has just completed his 10th novel, Revolver, and he spoke of this as being the first of his books he feels quite proud of due to the fact that it is the only one that has ended up like he initially visualised it. Marcus touched on Roger’s theme of how a book should make you feel and emphasised the importance of the cover as being the first thing that evokes a sense of the effect the book is going to have on you. He felt it was more important that a book cover serves this purpose rather than giving away any of the plot. On discussing the art of writing Marcus felt that, unlike most things in life, it gets harder to do – not easier. You always want to improve for yourself and at the same time your publisher always wants ‘what you did last time, but a little bit better.
 
The audience then had the chance to ask Marcus questions. The first was, ‘As an adult, how do you write for children?’He denounced the common theory that you set out to become a children’s author because you love children. The truth is, in his case anyway, you write for a certain age group because there is still a part of you that is stuck at that age and can therefore truly relate. His proof for this theory is that his own books are getting slightly older as he goes on – he estimated that, in book terms, he has now reached the age of 17.
 
The audience were also interested to hear how working in publishing had influence his job as a writer. In this respect he thinks it has made him a much better author for his Editors to work with  as he know the importance of submitting in time etc.
 
The last author to speak was Chris Lloyd, the non-fiction representation for the evening. Chris was a former journalist for the The Sunday Times who moved into the management of News International. Chris has written two books, the first one only having came out last year.
Chris also did know what he wanted to be when he was younger. In the end he opted for journalism and this led to him being a graduate trainee for The Sunday Times. He soon realised that as a general reporter you are easily dispensable­ ­- you need a speciality. It was this that led to him becoming a technological correspondent - this, andfthe act that he was one of the few people at the time to have a laptop. However, being in this position did put him in the spotlight, giving him more opportunity. He ended up helping to launch The Sunday Times Online and stayed there for ten years. After this he moved to Oxford where he worked in educational publishing for five years.
 
He decided to take a rather different route after this. He and his wife decided to take a year out and go travelling, taking their two children and home schooling them for a year.  In the UK the laws around this are very liberal – it is specifically the parent’s responsibility to make sure their child receives an education and it makes no difference whether this is in a conventional school or not. He and his wife ended up home schooling their children for six years as it proved to be a lot of fun, and a learning experience for them too.
 
It was when travelling round Europe that the idea for his first book came to him. He was doing the washing up on a campsite in Rome. The washing up was always a communal thing – after dinner members of each family would gather round the same taps to do their families washing up and would gossip whilst doing so, catching up on the day’s news from the campsite. On this particular day he was disappointed to find there was no one else there to talk to. As a result he started imagining what he would say if he could talk to the trees and grass around him. This developed in to him wondering what he would ask them if he could talk to them – simple questions such as how old they were. He concluded that human beings were so obsessed with themselves as a species that we did not really care or question the history of the earth around us. This then developed into the grandiose plan of writing one book that connected all the history of all the subjects.
 
When he got back from travelling he started straight away on writing this book. He realised he would need an agent and was one of the lucky authors who was able to get one fairly quickly. After this he finished the book quickly too. His ability to work so well to deadlines is something he attributes to having worked in the fast-paced, deadline driven newspaper industry – Chris described the book industry as being ‘painfully slow’ in comparison.
 
In order to promote the book Chris decided to develop an hour long presentation that tells the whole story from the Big Bang to the present day. He  still does these lectures and finds them one of the most entertaining parts of his job - they are especially fun to do in schools. His second book is called What on Earth evolved... in Brief; 100 Species That Have Changed the World. The plan is for the third one to be a history of the material world - not the periodic table but a history of materials such as gun powder. Chris was extremely enthusiastic about how much fun he was having being a writer. He wanted to emphasise that non-fiction was not just about the conveying of information - the real art of it is all about how you convey the information and finding new ways to present material, giving age-old subjects a new twist.
 
The first question from the audience was:How did you go about your research and how do you manage to condense what some people have spent their lifes studying, into a sentence?' Chris again attributed his ability to work concisely and to deadlines to his time working on a newspaper, which helped him in his ability to process information. Also, the internet is one of the best tools when researching. As well as this he spent a lot of time emailing academics - a group who are always willing to go out of their way to help you, he has found. The audience also wanted to know if anybody has found any mistakes in his concise histories. Chris said he had not had any complaints yet and that it had been the translators who had been the most diligent in picking up any errors that had slipped through the net.  Chris' plan for his next book is to have a history of the next 300 years - he will position himself as a  300 years in the future and write as a historian looking back.
 
24 January 2010

InPrint: News

SYP Conference 2009: Making an ImPRESSion



Given what the weather conditions were like on the weekend of the SYP conference, it was a sure-fire bet a lot of young (and not-so-young) publishers would be blowing about at this year’s conference at Oxford Brookes University. 'Making an ImPRESSion' was this year’s theme and impressions were clearly made on the 200 who came together for the event.

When you gather together like-minded people you’re bound to agree on most things, disagree on a few and offer varying opinions, but have a good time overall. That was clearly witnessed by something of a new, and hopefully continuing, trend at this year’s proceedings: jonny-on-the-spot Twitter coverage! Pardon the pun.

In case you're not familiar with it, Twitter is the micro-blogging site that challenges you to say what you are doing in 140 characters or less. This was a challenge taken up by many at the conference as witnessed by the ever-constant stream (some might say waterfall) of consciousness under the hash tag #sypconf09.

Many young publishers have embraced this form of social networking and put it to good use. The benefits of such a medium allowed those in attendance to virtually enjoy every seminar on offer without having to attend each one on its own. Of course, in a perfect world you would attend each one, but that wasn’t going to happen. If you then spread this out to the publishing community-at-large, your audience just went international! That was clearly the case judging by the 40 pages worth of ‘tweets’ the #sypconf09 hash tag held by the end of the day. That’s over 350 tweets!

Getting the event started with an opening debate on the ‘Paradigms of Modern Publishing’, the SYP secured something of a coup by having Penguin’s out-going Managing Director, Helen Fraser; Faber and Faber's Sales & Marketing Director, Will Atkinson; and Borders UK’s Category Manager, Michael Jones, present their thoughts on commerce, culture and the critical balancing game between the two. It was a great topic to get the ball rolling and minds fired-up with several thought-provoking points being made. Fraser spoke to the fact that books do not merely furnish your shelves, but furnish your lives, and Atkinson supplemented her argument by saying that publishers are still just businesses that must report good results to their board of directors, whilst also being the drivers of culture. Some books come and go, but others do make a lasting impact (I need not mention a certain boy wizard here and his effect on publishing!).

Over the course of the day, seminars revolving around the Economics of Publishing, Digital Developments, Design, CV clinics, Entrepreneurial Publishing and taking hold of your career were all on tap to take in, soak up and enjoy. Here’s a brief overview of what this member attended:

Economics of Publishing
Richard Hart, MD of Hart Publishing (Oxford), came with a single message for the seminar he lead: 'speculate to accumulate'. In doing so, he offered some insight and experience on what it takes to build a successful list, the mistakes to avoid in commissioning and the importance of investing in your staff’s development, interests and skills. In addition, you must ensure that a steady editorial hand is holding the tiller of your company. His advice above all else: learn how to read the balance sheet and sales reports!

Digital Developments
Continual changes in the marketplace and delivery of content is, without a doubt, influencing the way publishers are packaging their content. The effect of the Internet has been substantial and will only continue to affect the change. This was the platform that Chris Meade (Head of the Institute for the Future of the Book) and David Atwoll (Atwoll Associates) directed their seminar from.

The future will be shaped by the people who can see things afresh...like the book was one of the messages extolled to those listening (and tweeting). The book is becoming more of an experience rather than just paper glued together. Technology allows new and interesting ways to develop content; readers have changed the way that they read, so making sure you have compelling content is crucial. Meade said that “writers have been broke all along, so the possibility to make some money in new ways is good”.

 


Joining the Conversation on Twitter

Throughout the day, about half-a-dozen members continually tweeted the insights being presented and their own on the micro-blogging website. It was a great way to stay up-to-date on the seminars not attended in place of the ones you did, and created a substantial amount of facts, figures and web-links.

You can see the full conversation from the conference on Twitter here.

Particular thanks go to: @sashers, @LindsJacks, @JonSlack, @JulieJolie and, of course, @SYP_UK for all their Twitter coverage!


Creative Commons License
inPrint Society of Young Publishers Conference Report by Jonathan Davis is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 2.0 UK: England & Wales License.

22 November 2009

InPrint: News

Kindling the debate: publishing audio and e-books

The SYP’s September speaker meeting covered the hot topic of the moment: are printed books essential, or is a move to purely electronic media inevitable?
 
First to speak was Bella Todd, Editor of Latest 7 magazine and founder of Time Out’s monthly audio books column, A Word in Your Ear. ‘I’m speaking to you as a fan rather than an industry professional,’ Bella told us. ‘I pitched A Word in Your Ear in 2008 because I loved audio books. My first encounter of them was my mum taping them for me from the radio. Now it’s more about commuters and iPods.
 
‘There’s been a massive shift in the past few years in the type and range of audio books available, from classic to cult, to new books. People can download the same books as are being reviewed in the books sections. Time Out exists to give coverage and consideration to all art forms, and I think audio books merit this ­– they are an art form. Think of the quality and calibre of reading that are available.
 
‘Audio books have allowed me to finish lots of books that I’d only just started to read, such as Midnight’s Children and Tristram Shandy. It’s a bit like having a personal trainer – and it means I don’t read the same paragraph three times! I don’t think it’s dumbing down at all; audio books are a means of engaging new readers.’
 
Next to speak was Simon Bell, Head of Strategic Partnerships and Licensing at the British Library. Until a year ago, Simon worked in mainstream publishing. ‘Now I work at the British Library on the issue of digitisation – which is front and central to the current debate amongst significant libraries worldwide.
 
‘We’re a legal deposit library, which means a copy of every item published in the UK is deposited in the library. We exist not just to collect and provide access to books, but also to audio, movies, web content, comics, journals and so on. It’s really a collection of the intellectual content of the UK.
 
‘There’s an increasing appetite from the Google generation – they don’t go to libraries to find information, they want to access it from their desktop. This, of course, means digitisation. We have over 150 million objects in the British Library, so it’s a big project, but it’s a service to the scholarly community. We particularly want to make out of print items available and accessible through digitisation.
 
‘Digitisation is expensive, even where there’s a commercial return, which isn’t the case for the more obscure items. For example, we have millions of newspapers in our archive – there’s no money from the public purse to digitise them, so how do we find the money? We have to find commercial partnerships, but then how do they gain a return – especially when ideally we want to provide the content for free?’
 
Colin Weir, Business Development Coordinator at Audible.co.uk, told us that Audible have ‘around 35 000 downloads available on our website, from comedy sketches to books. The pricing varies, but has to be in line with the customers’ expectations. They tend to see a download as equivalent to an album, not a box set of CDs that they’d buy in a shop.
 
‘We offer a membership plan, which allows you to download one audio book a month for £7.99 or two for £14.99. I take this membership plan, and go out to partners to see how to develop it. I try to spread the word about audio books, and partnerships help us to reach new readers.
 
‘So who buys audio books? As I see it, there are two niches. The first is people who go to libraries and shops and buy a CD box set of an audio book, but are yet to be converted to the benefits of downloading. So we’d target these people by something like placing an offer in the Radio Times offering a free audio book. Of course, we do often get older ladies calling up who don’t understand how to get their free book, but we can help them with that!
 
‘The second is people who love downloading and iTunes, but aren’t yet fans of audio books. They think they’re only for the elderly or the visually impaired. Twenty per cent of 18–25 year olds haven’t read a book in the past year, and these are the people to grab. We give them a celebrity biography or a music biography – for example our partnership with Xfm where we gave away the Nick Cave audio book. We also have offers for children – for example, free Horrid Henry downloads in partnership with Marmite.’
 
Clive Stanhope, Managing Director at CSA word, was next to speak. ‘Audio books tend to be forgotten by book publishers – they’re second on the list,’ Clive told us. ‘But digital life is coming and it’s here to stay. And audio books are here to stay. There are of course copyright issues to consider, and the debate over the MP3 versus the Windows format, but these issues are largely being ironed out, and the audio book is well established.
 
‘Pricing is, of course, an issue. An audio book is a physical product and there is a manufacturing cost. With downloadable content, when it’s created, there’s nothing left to pay for – the publisher doesn’t lose any money on reprints, apart from perhaps through royalties. There are no stock issues.
 
‘However, you do have to record the book. How do you produce an unabridged audio book for £15.99? There’s no extra CD cost, but you still have to pay the reader, studio costs, and the rights.
 
‘For many of our titles at CSA, the break-even point is not yet being met by download sales alone. We have only three of four titles which would have made a profit if we hadn’t released them on CD also. But our CD sales are up on last year, despite the recession. I don’t think downloads are taking the place of CD sales, but it shows that new people are getting into audio books.
 
‘We’ve had a long battle with getting electronic rights. At first it wasn’t clear whether you were allowed to sell downloads as well as CDs when you’d bought audio rights. We have to pay royalties to both the author and the reader, and agents ask for the majority of the money as they think we have no costs. But they don’t think about things like the fact that we had to dump all our cassettes at one stage – we bore that cost – and royalties are being earnt, so they’re not being ripped off.’
 
Our final speaker for the evening was Neil Jewsbury, Commercial Director at Waterstone’s. He was involved with the launch of the Sony e-reader, ‘the most exciting development within the industry in recent years.’ Neil shared with us some customer insights about their experiences of e-books. ‘People think that the people who are into e-books are geeky first-time adopters, but this isn’t the case – the split in our customers were roughly 50 % male and 50 % female, with 70 % over 35. 60% buy more than eight books a year, and 90% had bought a book within the past three months, so they were buying both physical and e-books.
 
‘When asked what they enjoyed about e-reading, they said that it was “new and exciting,” and “convenient”, especially for travelling. It was also “in-line with current times,” and gave a more fashionable look to reading. In terms of what they didn’t like, they wanted to know why there wasn’t more choice in the range of e-books, and why it’s not possible to buy an e-book at the same time as the hardback is launched. They were also confused by the pricing. They weren’t clear about why e-books are VAT-able and physical books aren’t, thus making the e-book more expensive. They tend to automatically assume that a digital book will be cheaper than a conventional book.
 
‘It’s certainly an exciting development for the book industry – e-books are touching and reaching new customers. It’s a convenient method of reading, and it’s a positive development for authors, publishers and readers. However, there industry has to consider three things – pace, price and possible piracy. The digital space moves faster than anything we’ve known before, so pace is of the essence. Customers will demand this. In terms of price – it’s not about marching to the lowest price. We should be sensible about pricing. The customer doesn’t want to feel overcharged. If these two things aren’t addressed, piracy will be the result.’
 
Questions followed, on the topics of whether digitisation is overall a good or a bad thing – the general consensus from the panel was that it is. As Simon pointed out, 80% of academic journals are available digitally. ‘Academic and STM publishers have been quietly getting on with the process of digitisation while everyone else has been making a fuss about it.’ The panel also felt that the e-reader is an intermediate technology – a multi-purpose device is the way forward, and that in ten years’ time, digitisation will be the norm – no-one will comment on it anymore.
 
The panel also commented on whether the publishing industry is capitalising on digital technology – to which they suggested that the industry is being held back by fear of piracy and fear of what e- and audio books will do to our existing business model. Clive cited his background in the music industry – ‘the music industry moves a lot faster. They leap on new technologies, even if they don’t always turn out to work, they try it. Book publishers have to realise the technology is out there are get on with it.’
 
Neil summed up the dilemma and ended the evening with the idea that ‘there are two ends of the spectrum – the problem and the opportunity. Publishers’ focus is wrong. If they continue to be preoccupied by the problem, they will miss the opportunity.’
 
Lucy Mitchell
 
03 November 2009

InPrint: News

Canon Tales Presents 'Free?'

To celebrate the official opening of the FREE WORD centre, Canon Tales presented ‘Free?’, showcasing the professional and personal stories of the people and organisations now based in the centre.
 
The centre’s mission is to promote innovation and collaboration, and to ‘push boundaries to promote, protect and democratise the power of the written and spoken word for creative and free expression.’
 
Each speaker was asked to consider the question, ‘how free is the word?’ illustrating their thoughts and stories in the traditional Canon Tales format of 20 images, each lasting for 21 seconds, totalling a 7 minute talk.
 
First to speak was Miranda McKearney, Director of The Reading Agency. Miranda shared her story with us, and explained how she became part of FREE WORD. Her engagement with the written word really began, she told us, as the age of five, when she was allowed to choose her own books at the library. ‘Suddenly there were all these feelings, pinging around my brain as I read. And the best thing was that I could go back and get more, and choose my own! I felt like I was connecting to other lives and feelings – and the rest of the world. I became a “bigger me”; I was suddenly freer.
 
‘When I grew up, I became an arts marketer. I started working on reading projects with freedom of speech activists, which started me experimenting. This led to me starting The Reading Agency seven years ago. Its mission is to bring more reading to more people.
 
‘I see libraries as a radicalising, socialising force – the difference they’re making is what gets me up in the morning. Our Summer Reading Challenge attracts around 700 000 kids. We also run HeadSpace, which looks at libraries and their future as a service by allowing young people to design their library space, and the Six Book Challenge. It really makes a difference.’
 
Next to speak was Tim O’Dell, Reader Development Officer for the London Borough of Lambeth. Tim’s images included many of authors, such as Doris Lessing and Ben Okri, who have spoken in Lambeth libraries. Tim spoke about the fact that, with the advent of the web, ‘everyone can Google. Libraries might therefore seem redundant, but look at the recent surge of reading groups. In the last three years, we’ve have over 150 authors in Lambeth libraries.’
 
Regarding the idea of the ‘free word’, Tim told us ‘access to words has to be free. People learn about empathy and the other through reading. It improves society. We’re lucky to have organisations such as The Reading Agency as a bridge to make his happen.’
 
Following Tim was Sarah Ellis, programme manager for Apples and Snakes, the leading organisation for performance poetry. Sarah spoke to us about, and shared images of, the project that she has been working on for the past year, promoting freedom through participation. Five writers around the country were asked to write on the theme of place. ‘Each chose their own residency, which ranged from a London allotment to an area of Derby rife with postcode wars and gang culture. The artists stayed in their chosen place for a year, absorbing the place and creating work in response to this.
 
‘One way that they shared this work was through blogging. They created an online world where they could work with an audience to discuss their residencies. This also gave the artists the chance to share their thoughts and participate in their chosen community. The online element meant that they could share their work with an audience who wouldn’t have had the chance to participate otherwise. They were able to highlight disenfranchised people and those who may not have a voice otherwise.’
 
Next to tell his tale was Robert Sharp, campaigns manager at English PEN. Robert’s canon tale was concerned with the work and history of English PEN, which, he told us, began as a literary dining club – ‘social networking before there was social networking! They began to do some campaigning. C.A. Dawson Scott was the founder, and John Gallsworthy was the first president.’
 
Robert’s images also included one of Harold Pinter and Arthur Miller on a fact-finding mission to Turkey, with Orhan Pamuk as their guide. ‘Our main projects include taking literature in other languages and translating it into English. This bothers some regimes, who are not interested in having a multitude of voices in their culture.
 
‘Aung San Suu Kyi is one of the people who has been on our case list for the longest. These people attack your family and friends, so your voice is silenced even if you have escaped and are free. There’s a trend in freedom of speech issues in the UK to legislate for offence or outrage. There’s an outsourcing of censorship from governments to communities. Communities want to censor each other. There’s a move to stop criminals from writing their memoirs and profiting from their misdeeds, but this law would technically apply to someone like Nelson Mandela.’
 
Sophie Lewis of the Dalkey Archive Press, whose mission is to establish an international context for the appreciation of modern and contemporary literature, was next to speak. She first showed us an image of Dalkey’s Context magazine, ‘it’s free! And it gives critical context to works you haven’t heard about yet.’ Next up was Flaubert: ‘we publish classics too!’ Sophie told us, ‘he’s the reason why I wanted to work for Dalkey.’
 
Sophie showed us a rather bleak image of her first sight of the archive, which is based in Illinois. ‘I realised that it wasn’t about pretty places, but about freedom of mind.’ She also showed an image of ‘our founding editor and director, John O’Brian. He’s a visionary, and has kept us going since the 1980s.’
 
The next few images were, in Sophie’s words ‘a pantheon of stars. We publish people who you know to be great, such as Melville and Gertrude Stein, but whose less major works go out of print after publication in English. We keep all our books in print continuously. It’s not about accessibility, but boundary-pushing. Many of these works need to be translated. It’s not so much about breaking down borders, but about acknowledging them and publishing across them.’
 
Sophie finished by displaying several images of anthologies showcasing writing from various cultures that might not otherwise be published, including Finnish, Cuban and Japanese volumes. ‘This is our attempt to redress this. There are so many voices you wouldn’t hear if they were never translated.’
 
Director of the Free Word Centre, Shreela Gosh, concluded the first half of the evening, telling us that ‘words are all around us,’ and in the spirit of encouraging audience participation and liberation had us all singing Happy Birthday.
 
She went on to tell us about, the parents of Free Word, and Dame Liz Forgan, Head of the Arts Council, ‘or our fairy godmother. We wouldn’t exist without the Arts Council. We wanted to find a home for literacy, literature and freedom of expression, and here it is.
 
‘We’ve been here a couple of months now, and it’s still a puzzle; it’s complicated. I need a decoder machine!’ Shreela’s images helped her to explore the nature of the Free Word Centre. ‘What if Free Word was a plant? It has deep roots, it’s flexible, it moves around. It’s like the whole eco system! Or what if it was like an animal? Would it be a giraffe? An elephant? No, I think it’s a fish, swimming against the tide.
 
‘Our ambition is to take our national centre to the rest of the world and become international. We are trying to make links and partnerships all across the world. Only three per cent of books published in the UK are in translation – it’s an important issue that we’re working on here.’
 
After an interval, Lance Lattig, Candice Holdsworth, Janee Rambocus and Natasha Schmidt from Index on Censorship gave a powerful presentation. Index on Censorship was founded to make sure people were continuously aware of the suppression of the freedom of speech, without having a political or ideological axe to grind. Their canon tale consisted of a series of images of figures such as Salman Rushdie, Liu Hongbin, Alexander Solzhenitsyn, Eduado Galliano and Anna Politkovskaya, together with quotes from these figures regarding freedom of speech.
 
Rebecca Swift, co-founder and Director of The Literary Consultancy, was next to speak. Her images included Moomins merchandise, a book written by her school teacher, which was later published by Virago, where Rebecca once worked, and Emily Dickinson, who was ‘freed and imprisoned by the gift of words. She made a marriage to her art.
 
‘Those of us who are free to write may be ambivalent about the double-bind of freedom. Jacques Derrida completely ruined everything! My first job was as a translator – I like to think I was freeing the word into English. But now the politics of translation is a big issue.’
 
Rebecca’s images also included Virago’s Carmen Kalil, ‘who liberated the words of women,’ and a black hole – ‘I was made redundant, and entered something of a psychic black hole. I was in a very bleak state, beyond language. I started a secret consultancy, using Betty Swann as a pseudonym. I charged people £50 to tell them what I thought about their poetry. Then I started the Literacy Consultancy, to help people think about their work. We help free people’s work into the market. But the question is, are you creatively free when you enter the market? Discuss!’
 
Nikesh Shukla, web editor at Booktrust, in a rapid, performance poetry style, showed us images of Rumplestiltskin – the brothers Grimm’s vivid stories frightened him as a child, and made him think his baby sister would be taken away, and Children’s Laureate Anthony Browne’s Gorillas – ‘he is showing us that picture books are for all ages.’
 
Spiderman also made an appearance – ‘ my mum didn’t like the fact that I read comics, but the fact was I read more than any other kid in my class’ – as well as The Buddha of Suburbia – ‘I wasn’t allowed to watch the TV programme, so I read it instead!’ Nikesh’s canon tale ended with images of some of Booktrust’s work – ‘in the letterbox club, children in care get a parcel with their names on, it gives them a sense of ownership, and we run education projects, encouraging creative writing in schools. That’s how we free the word.’
 
The evening was brought to a hilarious close by Joshua Idehen and Raymond Antrobus, artists in residence at the Free Word Centre, who brought us a spontaneous and ingenious Canon Tales ‘on the hoof ‘, written as they’d watched the evening unfold.
                                                                                 
Lucy Mitchell
03 November 2009

InPrint: News

The SYP and JFL Search and Selection Careers Evening: How to get a job in the recession

This year’s careers evening (ran by the SYP in association with JFL, Inspired Selection, Harper Collins and Bookcareers.com) saw Waterstone’s Simpsons room packed out with job seekers eager to soak up the advice from the four publishing recruitment consultants. Whether looking for your first job in publishing or trying to make that difficult next step up the ladder there was plenty of helpful information on how to try and stand out from the masses and get yourself noticed – especially welcome at a time when there seems to be very little opportunity out there. After hearing from the speakers, members of the audience queued up for the free C.V. consultation clinics on offer while the rest of the room set about enjoying the free drinks and networking.
First to speak was Ros Kindersley, Managing Director of JFL Search and Selection. As someone who has been recruiting for the publishing industry for the last 20 years, Ros has seen it all and knows better than anyone what exactly it is that recruiters are looking for in potential employees. First Ros addressed the main issues that are the forefront of job seeker’s minds:
·         What should I do if I don’t have a job at all? – Turn this to your advantage. This means that you are ‘available immediately’ which is definitely a plus for any employer looking to fill a role as quickly as possible. Also, this means that you have plenty of time to look for jobs and properly research roles and companies. It’s easy to get down hearted when you are unemployed but this time can be spent with plenty of active pursuits.
·         Keep an open mind! For those who filled in the questionnaire prior to the evening the results were not that surprising – the majority of job seekers are looking to get into editorial. Moreover, the majority of those are looking to work in trade fiction. Ros urged job seekers to properly give thought to other areas. There are plenty of other sections to consider and once you have your first break in the industry you can always change route. Even if you want to work in editorial, employers will be looking to see if you have a good knowledge of publishing as a whole. It is vital to understand how sales and marketing and production etc work and what their relationship with editorial is. Also, keep an open mind about the type of publishing you want to get into – the majority of jobs available are in Educational, Academic and STM publishing. The reality is that jobs sitting editing the next Booker Prize winner are few and far between and many promising opportunities can be missed out on if you try and stick to too rigid a path in your pursuit of the perfect job.
·         Where to find jobs? Aside from the obvious choices such as recruitment agencies, online (Bookseller website, The Guardian, SYP website) and word of mouth at networking events there is also the age-old trick of ‘being in the right place at the right time’. One way you can try and make sure this happens is, you guessed it, work experience! As was to be emphasised throughout the rest of the night, work experience is one of the most valuable things you can do to try and get into publishing. As well as showing your dedication, it is invaluable in making contacts in order to make sure you are the first person that springs to mind if and when a vacancy does become available.
·         What do recruiters want? Recruiters are looking for evidence. Evidence that you want to get into publishing. As well as getting involved with associations like the SYP, the best thing you can do to demonstrate ‘evidence’ is, again, work experience.
The Interview.
Ros encouraged job seekers not to see this as the terrifying ordeal that many do. Instead treat it as an opportunity. Some of the advice might have seemed obvious but it is important not to become blasé about the interview.
1.     Preparation is the key. Research the role – know what will be expected of you in the role and also find out as much as possible about the company – you will be asked and expected to know.
2.     Arrive on time and remember that you are ‘on trial’ from the moment you press the buzzer, so bear this in mind with everyone that you deal with. This includes members of reception, for example.
3.     Wear clothes you feel comfortable in. Obviously it is important to look smart but if you are the type of person that is visibly uncomfortable wearing a suit, this will radiate from you and make you look unconfident.
4.     Non-verbal communication. Amazingly, the actual words coming out of your mouth only count for a tiny percentage of how the interviewer judges you. It is the way you say it as well as your body language that gives away your true colours. Try and pick up on any habits you might have that may become particularly obvious when you are nervous.
5.     Another handy tip– When asked a question try and be aware of your eyes. If you look up to the left it means you are remembering something. If you look up to the right it means you are imagining something (i.e. lying). The seasoned interview will pick up on this, even if it is only subconsciously. (Although perhaps don’t take this advice too literally; you might look a bit strange if you spend the whole interview staring up at the left hand corner of the room.)
6.     There are different types of questions you will be asked throughout the interview:
·         Direct questions – For example, ‘Where do you live?’, ‘How long were you in your last role?’ Such questions require concise, precise answers and you should resist the temptation to ramble on.
·         Open questions – These will often start with ‘Tell me about’ or ‘Describe for me’. These are designed to start a discussion and you should be prepared to give longer answers to these.
·         Opinion questions – Again, you should be well prepared for these. These could be on any topic really but you should be prepared to give your thoughts on what is happening in the industry and your favourite types of books for example. Questions like these are a good opportunity to let your personality shine through and build a rapport with the interviewer.
·         Competency based questions – A ‘competency’ is a combination of skills, knowledge and experience required to form a certain task. To prepare for these look at the key criteria for the job.
·         Motivation and work ethic – In order to establish these qualities you should be prepared to discuss what you have done in order to achieve your goal to get into publishing. For example, state your situation (unemployed), your objective (to get a job) and then list the actions you have taken to achieve the objective (work experience, networking).
·         Finally, make sure you have some questions prepared of your own!
7.     Follow up the interview with an email thanking the interviewer for their time and expressing an interest in the job
            
Next up to offer their pearls of wisdom for jobseekers was Tim Palmer, Talent Attraction Manager at HarperCollins. Tim emphasised the importance of recruiters in a company as large as HarperCollins. As the people who work at a company are its very life-blood it is important that all is done to attract the best talent in the industry. One step that HarperCollins has taken to do this is to run a graduate scheme, the only publisher at the moment doing so. The alarming news was that this scheme received over 1,000 applicants this year which was a stark reminder of the scale of the competition out there.
 
Know the industry. Tim agreed with Ros on the point that any interviewer will expect you to be up-to-date with what is happening in the industry – especially the DIGITAL IMPACT!
 
Work experience – Of the whole panel, Tim was one of the strongest advocators of work experience and could not stress enough how valuable this could be in getting that first job. He readily acknowledged that working for free was by far not the easiest option but encouraged job-seekers to do all that they could to make sure they got this opportunity – even if it does mean taking an extra job in the evening.
 
When applying for work experience, do not just apply and then sit back and wait. Find out who it is deals with work experience applications and phone them up and get them to remember your name. Once you have got the work experience make sure that you make the most of your experience. This means being extremely proactive. Before you go there find out who it is you would like to meet and speak to and what you want to learn from them.
 
Tim finished by emphasising how important it was to persevere. Publishing is a difficult industry to get into and the experience can be down-heartening at times. However, if you want it bad enough it will happen. Have a clear idea of where it is you want to go in your career and how your research, work experience and networking can help you get there.
Next up to speak was Orna O’Brien of the Publishing Training Centre. This is a non-profit organisation that offers short courses, distance learning and in-house training for everyone who works in publishing, or uses publishing skills in their business.
Orna made an interesting point about publishing and training. We call ourselves ‘professionals’ but we differ from most other professions, such as doctors and lawyers, in that we do not traditionally go through any vocational training. Publishers enter the industry and are suddenly expected to know how to put together a book. Obviously learning on the job is how it is done and is the best way of learning the business. However, there are certain skills such as editing, desktop publishing etc that can be taught out with the workplace, making you more prepared and a bigger asset as a new employee. This is partly why publishing MAs, while by no means a pre-requisite to gain entry into the business, are becoming ever more popular. The centre started with two courses, imaginatively called ‘Editorial 1’ and ‘Editorial 2’ but now there are many to choose from.
Orna also raised the importance of having a Personal Development Plan. While this is something that you may have been made to do at university, or through your work, it is definitely worth taking the time to make one on your own. To quote The Peter Principle, ‘If you don’t know where you are going, you will probably end up somewhere else’. Your written plan should cover:
·         Goals and intentions
·         An assessment of what your skills are
·         An action plan. This can include training courses to take and smaller goals – such as attending SYP events.
You also need to adopt an on-going review policy. When you have landed your first job it is easy be tempted to be sit back and relax. It is important to keep progressing and thinking what the next best step to take is towards your ultimate goal.
Orna also stressed the importance of work experience – this can even be volunteering from your own home. Many companies, charities for example, will welcome the skills of editors etc. Another important way to increase your marketability, especially at the moment, is to remain digitally savvy. There is a huge need for understanding in this area at the moment and it will definitely set you ahead of the game if you possess digital skills.
Suzanne Collier is the Business Manager of BookCareers. As well as keeping an online register of those looking for jobs in the industry (CV Clearing House) she is about to launch a job club for those who are unemployed and looking for publishing jobs. She started by discussing what is arguably your biggest tool in the job-hunt – your C.V. Think of it as a marketing tool for yourself. Essentially, it is your ticket to the interview and it is important that it sells you as quickly and clearly as possible. Think of the three main points on your C.V. that sell you. Now look at your C.V. If you cannot find these three things within ten seconds of looking at it, then you can be fairly certain an employer won’t. It seems a short amount of time but the reality is that this might be all that an employer might give your C.V. when faced with hundreds of applications.
Another piece of advice Suzanne gave was to resist the temptation to lie or exaggerate on your C.V. Employers will be aware that the reality is that you probably spent your two weeks work experience stuffing envelopes. This does not mean that you did not spend the time learning about the functionality of a publishing house, for example. It is better to say something like this about the experience rather than making unrealistic claims about what you did. One thing that you do not want to come across as is dishonest.
Suzanne was also keen to emphasise the importance of keeping your CV completely mistake free. It does seem obvious but apparently more than 50% of people registered with the CV Clearing House have mistakes in their CVs and it goes without saying this is the biggest faux pas you can commit when applying for a publishing role, especially an editorial one. Finally remember to attach the attachment! We’ve all done it but a job application is not a time you can afford to make any such unprofessional mistakes.
Following the four speakers there was some time to ask the panel members some questions after which people queued up for the free CV clinics as the rest of the room enjoyed some drinks and nibbles whilst partaking in that ultimate career step – networking!
Claire Robertson
 
03 November 2009

InPrint: News

London Book Club: September

September’s book club choice was The Girl with the Dragon Tattoo. The general consensus was that most people really liked the book, though many of us wouldn’t have picked it up if it hadn’t have been a book club choice. The cover was probably the main thing that people found off-putting – its brashness and typical ‘thriller’ look meant that it didn’t come across as the type of book many of us would usually pick up, so we were all surprised at how much we enjoyed it, though one reader mentioned that they had found it difficult to get into the book at first, as lots of information is given in the opening chapter.
 
The discussion moved on to the central character, Salander, who many thought had seemed peripheral at first, with one person mentioning that it wasn’t immediately clear how she would tie into the plot, though she found her intriguing and wanted to know more about her. Others found themselves more interested initially in Blomkvist and the Vanger family mystery. We talked at some length about Salander’s moral compass – her attitude seemed to be that authority fails women, or that men fail women, and therefore violence against men in retaliation is acceptable, something that many of us found difficult to reconcile ourselves with. In fact, the theme of violence towards women, and especially the extreme violence that Salander’s guardian inflicts on her, made for uncomfortable reading.
 
Blomkvist’s relationships also sparked lots of discussion. His attitude towards women seemed fairly blasé, and many of us were sceptical about the fact that he seemed to be able to seduce any women who crossed his path – we felt that possibly this was wish-fullfilment on behalf of the author. This conversation led us back to the theme of violence against women that is so important in the book. One member of the group told us that the Swedish title translated as ‘Men who hate women’. The author really makes this point, we felt, with statistics about violence against women at the beginning of each section, but then he makes women into victims anyway, seemingly without any way out of this situation.
 
One reader told us that although she had enjoyed the book, she had found the characterisation forced and the information contrived. Others agreed that the extremely specific computer references – may date the book and were often rather jarring. The idea of hackers as misfits – also seemed rather stereotypical to most of us.
 
Other criticisms included the ‘Wenestrom affair’ subplot – it seemed to many readers to be more of a sideline than a central part of the plot, and some questioned why it was there at all, though the promise of information that will bring down Wenestrom does give Vanger the bait to entice Blomkvist to work for him. The slightly farcial element that is introduced in connection with this side of the story, where the main players trick a duplicitous employee into believing that their magazine is closing down, was also a little weak and let down the subplot, in many of our opinions. We also felt that the ‘twin’ aspect to the mystery wasn’t particularly original and has been done before, and that there were some plot holes – for example, after the murderer is revealed, his girlfriend is conveniently never mentioned again.
 
We felt that the book would make a good film – and the discussion centred for some time on who would play the central characters, but we eventually returned to the book itself and the question of whether it was well-written. One person found it a bit ‘clunky’, and though that the way that information is revealed didn’t feel seamless. However, it was suggested that this might be a result of reading literature in translation – unless you happen to be bilingual, there’s no way of telling whether this ‘clunkiness’ is a result of the original writing, or the translation.
 
 
03 November 2009

InPrint: News

London Book Club: August

In his book, The Five People you meet in Heaven, Mitch Albom proposes a theory regarding what happens to a person when they die. The central character in the novel is a man called Eddie. Albom uses several of Eddie’s birthdays as a way of depicting the various stages of Eddie’s life. In the wider picture, Albom later refers to these events and reveals why certain incidents occurred, how Eddie’s actions affected others, and how other people’s actions affected his life.
 
In the preface to the book, Albom tells us that the book is supposed to represent a particular idea of Heaven. I get the impression that while reading most of the book club paid more attention to the theory suggested by Albom rather than the different characters in the book, as when we had finished reading the book we didn’t actually remember who all of the five people were (although between us we did manage to name all five, which is the good thing about large book clubs)!
 
I feel that the reason the five different people failed to make a lasting impression on us was that, on a deeper level, what we were actually concentrating on was understanding the theory that Albom was proposing (regardless of whether or not we found it to be a plausible concept). Most people at our book club are English graduates and are thus in the habit of analysing the theory proposed by an author. However, at the same time I think this does also demonstrate that the storyline was written clearly enough for readers to actually focus on the message that the author was trying to purvey: that Heaven is a place where your life is revealed to you by five people who you affected in some way or another (including people whom you considered to be strangers).
 
There were mixed feelings at book club about this book. For quite obvious reasons, people who had strong feelings about the book (either positive or negative) reacted in this way due to their own religious beliefs. For example, to one person who is a devout atheist, the book appeared to be preaching the concept of Heaven as a place you go to when you die, when in fact they personally would just use the word in a very casual way; for example, they might use the phrase ‘I’m in Heaven!’ because they’re at their favourite sporting event. Although to someone who is religious and has a preconceived idea of Heaven, the book appeared to be challenging their preconceived idea of Heaven and to many people that too is either annoying or a disappointment.
 
The book also led to a discussion about why a person dies. The author had appeared to suggest that when we die we all die for a particular reason, for example, to save the life of another, thus making us all martyrs in our own little ways. 

As a whole, most people thought the story was quite sentimental, and thus we felt it was a book that would be enjoyed by women, but might not be quite so appealing to men. It’s also interesting that the screenplay adaptation does not actually appear to be quite as popular as the book itself.

Serena Alam

19 October 2009

InPrint: News

Generation Y-A: Publishing Teenage Fiction

The SYP’s July Speaker meeting looked at the ins and outs of writing for and with teenagers and young adults, and took place at Paddington Children’s Library.
 
First to speak was David Floyd from not-for-profit design agency Social Spider. He works with young people on publishing projects, including Contrast magazine, based in the borough of Hackney. ‘Local authorities are now investing in regeneration projects,’ David told us. ‘They’re providing professional quality projects for local communities. This sort of thing has grown up over the past 10 years because it fits with public policy.
 
‘It’s about young people having their say about things. The key benefit is that a young person has an opinion to express, they turn up and they write about it. They benefit from both the product and the process. The young people involved in creating the magazine receive training in media skills, which provides them with transferable skills, and the local community benefit from reading the magazine. It also makes local councils look good.
 
‘It’s a really positive project – it allows young people to promote their local community.’
 
David was joined by his Social Spider colleague, David Warrington, ex-editor of Exposure, a similar publication based in Harringay. In his time at Exposure, David worked with over 1000 young people. The most popular page in the magazine, he told us, was the problem page. But young people aren’t really looking for advice. ‘They want to laugh at people – they don’t want to be told what to do and what to think. The more cruel and silly answers were given to serious problems, the more they liked it.
 
‘In my time there we only had two genuine problems submitted to the problem page. Young people are reluctant to ask for help – they don’t want to look like they don’t know all the answers.
 
‘We aim to give them a voice – they think that no one listens to them. We tried to encourage them to write really freely and without inhibition about what they know, which is far more revealing than any problem page. You can take things that only young people know about and let them explain themselves.
 
‘At one point we nearly lost editorial control, as the council wanted us to submit the whole magazine to them for vetting – but you have to let young people be free to express themselves.’
 
Children’s author Jill Hucklesby was next to speak. Her first two books, Deeper than Blue and Last Kiss of the Butterfly, were published by Orchard. ‘I came to children’s writing by accident,’ Jill told us. ‘Deeper than Blue was a TV concept that had been optioned. It went through the development process, but for one reason or another it didn’t happen. I then wrote the book to safeguard the idea, and found that I loved the whole process. It’s very different from writing for TV. I felt I’d found the right voice.
 
‘Both books have done well in awards – especially ones voted for by children. It’s hard to describe how to write for teenagers – it just flows, the voices come first. The girls want to tell their stories.
 
Deeper than Blue is about an Olympic dream that’s shattered by an accident. The main character, a champion swimmer, is involved in an accident and loses a leg. It’s about finding the courage to go full circle and to find the courage to go back into competitive swimming. It’s dark and deep.
 
‘My next two novels are going to be with Egmont. They’re encouraging me to explore my darker side, though the books will end positively.
 
Last Kiss is about a girl who is streetwise, but who struggles with dyslexia and dyspraxia. Her mum has had cancer. She has aggressive tendencies. Finally, when everything seems to be going right, her mum takes her off for the whole summer, with no friends. There’s a sense of conflict. She wants to stamp her identity on her life after caring for her mum, but then her mum gets ill again. It’s about compromise, challenge and landscape. She meets a boy who teaches her about nature. She’s stronger at the end.
 
‘Both girls are survivors. They’re not moralistic books, they’re about journeys.’ Jill concluded her talk by reading us an extract from Deeper than Blue.
 
Kate O’Hearn, author of the Shadow of the Dragon series, was our next speaker. ‘I have a completely different writing style to Jill – I’m a writer of young adult fantasy fiction. I was once asked by an editor at Scholastic whether I did pony books or hamster books! But I love fantasy – it gives me a real sense of freedom.
 
‘Does my editor stop me from getting too dark? I have two editors, a commissioning editor and her assistant. They have different ideas about what should be allowed. The younger one is more sensitive: the older one likes violence but no kissing! I’m stuck somewhere in the middle and have to do a bit of self-governing.
 
Kate asked the audience whether they could name a children’s fantasy book where children die and don’t come back to life. Someone suggested Harry Potter. ‘Ok, maybe Harry Potter. But I wanted to do this – one of my characters starves to death and literally fades away – but my editor wouldn’t allow it. I can hurt or maim children in my novels, but not kill them. Yet Jill was allowed to kill off a child in reality fiction!
 
‘The first book I ever finished was an adult thriller. I didn’t have an agent, and it was never published. I sent it off to a publisher, and they asked to see more and started the editorial work. Then I got a job with that publisher – at Hodder and Stoughton. I did it to spy really! My office was on the children’s floor. By a process of osmosis I realised that I was falling in love. My story started to form. My stories are based on political events in current times, but the fantasy setting gives me a platform to say things that I couldn’t in adult thrillers.
 
‘I don’t think my writing style has changed – perhaps this means that I am a poor adult thriller writer! I don’t swear in my children’s books, but as far as limits go, that’s the only difference between my writing for adults and children. I don’t tone down the violence.’
 
Kate then read us an extract from the Shadow of the Dragon series, which is set in a world where girls have to follow a very strict set of rules, and follows the journey of the first girl to dare to break these rules.
 
‘When it came to choosing an agent, I looked at who got the best advances and went to them – I worked in the contracts department so I could tell,’ Kate went on to say. ‘But they couldn’t place my work with a publisher, so I went to the next one, and within three weeks she’d placed the novel with Hodder. I wouldn’t say there was any nepotism. It made it through acquisitions, where most of the people didn’t know me. Plus we sold a lot of foreign rights.
 
‘It’s definitely best to find an agent – even though I thought at first that I could represent myself, an agent will always get you a better deal.
 
‘When writing for children, you have to get rid of the excess baggage – the word counts are shorter. But it’s still quality writing. It shouldn’t be dismissed as not literary. And it’s more fun to write for young adults.’
 
Our final speaker of the evening was Joy Court, Head of the Schools Library and Resource Service in Coventry, and chair of judges for the Carnegie and Kate Greenaway award. ‘In case you don’t know about it, the Carnegie medal is awarded to a work of outstanding literary quality. Books aren’t submitted by publishers, but by the end-users – the librarians. The Kate Greenaway award is for illustrated books.
 
‘Our job is to engage children as readers. It’s a growing market, and it beggars belief that there is so little broadsheet reviewing of children’s books. I think the UK’s world-class children’s publishing is partly due to 72 years of the Carnegie medal. The panel is made up of twelve judges and the chair, who are selected from all regions of the UK. Any book that these people can fit into the judging criteria and then agree on will definitely stand the test of time. Bog Child by Siobhan Dowd was the winner this time.
 
‘The Carnegie is the only award with a published set of criteria. The winner has to fit specific aspects of plot, character and style, and also be an outstanding literary work, that lives with you.
 
‘Children’s writing shouldn’t be denigrated. It’s hard to write to engage young people. It’s crucial to get people hooked on reading. The Carnegie is no stranger to controversy, since Junk won in 1996.
 
‘Often what is used to distinguish whether a book is for older or younger teenagers or from children is the element of swearing. If a book is labelled for an older child, and eleven-year-old will go for it straight away. Junk doesn’t glorify drug use – it’s very moral. It inspired endless debates, particularly in the Daily Mail.
 
‘The power of literature means that young people can experience the world safely, and make judgements about what they’d do in the situations that the characters find themselves in. It shouldn’t pull any punches.
 
‘So does the Carnegie medal matter to young people? Yes, I think it does. Over 4000 schools registered to be on the shadow panel this year, with over 16000 reviews being posted on the website. It makes them read books they wouldn’t usually have picked. The winner is then decided by a panel of librarian judges.
 
‘The Carnegie has led to many local awards being set up. Kids want to take it one step further and actually vote for themselves. It gets the whole community involved, with families reading and discussing books at the same time.
 
‘Any book publishes in English on a children’s list is eligible, even if it is simultaneously publishes on an adult list with a different cover. The year runs from 1st September to 31st August. We consider books originally published in Australia or the US, but they have to be publishes in the UK within three months of the original pub date.
 
‘The panel read all of the books – usually about 50 over six weeks. Every single book is discussed at the short-listing meeting. The chair’s job is to make sure that all the judges get a say. All short-listed books are a potential winner. We read the short list three or four times. The winner must therefore sustain a level of engagement, though it may have lost its initial impact for us. The local award, where children vote, are more impact-based.’
 
Questions from the audience included whether the authors feel a responsibility about the messages they are passing on to other people’s children – to which they answered yes, but they still venture into dark areas, and things that the reader might experience. Kate mentioned that she sometimes meets children who can quote chapter and verse from her books, so it seems that they have really registered and had an impact, so she suddenly worries more about what she’s saying.
 
Kate and Jill were asked whether they write with a character in mind or a storyline, or whether they see what comes out when they write. Kate told us that her publishers now enforce an outline for any new book, so she feel less free. ‘I took a similar route,’ Jill told us. ‘I was very free with the first book but after getting a two-book deal, the publisher wanted an outline for the second. It’s a very different way of writing. It ties you in quite a lot, but I can see that it’s a necessary part of the decision-marking process, especially when you’re just starting out.’
 
When asked for her views on the current market for teenage fiction, Joy summed up the evening: ‘the range and quality is good – it’s a brilliant time to be a teenager. It’s important to promote emotional literacy – you can give them books to help them through real-life situations, and to understand how people work in different situations. That’s why it’s important to write from the heart.’

Lucy Mitchell

19 October 2009

InPrint: News

The Rough Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy

I was really irritated last year when I saw that Penguin had chosen Eoin Colfer to write the next Hitchhiker’s Guide to the Galaxy book.  Irritated, because I’ve never really rated the writing of Eoin Colfer.  I guess some kids may find a dwarf that consumes and defecates rubble to be amusing, but I don’t.  Then again, I’m not a kid.  Having written that, I do think my current writing style has been greatly influenced by watching and reading Douglas Adams’ work in my youth.  Indeed, I’ve And Another Thingspent many an idle moment thinking of how I would write the sixth Hitchhikers book…  I’ve had visions of handing out copies of a book with “Don’t Panic” emblazoned in nice friendly letters on the cover to stressed city workers … Or depicting the final moments of Arthur Dent and Martin in a book called Paranoid Android…  If I’d been responsible for drawing up a list of names to write the sixth Hitchhikers, then Robert Rankin, Jasper Fforde, Steven Moffat, David Walliams, and Mark Gatiss would have been on the list.  Eoin Colfer wouldn’t have got anywhere near it.  And I’m not the only one who’s dubious about Colfer – Penguin even noted the amount of consternation their choice had arisen amongst Hitchhikers fans in a press release in December – which is hardly a great selling point.  And with a title like And Another Thing, I just get the impression that Colfer’s going to raid a very bare chest of jokes for this book.  It’s not as if Penguin had to employ an in-house author for this project, since they recently chose Sebastian Faulks to write as Ian Fleming.  In one of those idle moments, I’ve even been thinking of protesting outside the Penguin offices in my dressing gown, à la Arthur Dent. Seriously Penguin, don’t let Eoin Colfer write the next two books in this new trilogy!
  Of course, Eoin Colfer’s original big bucks contract ran into controversy when Penguin did a special deal with WH Smith for the first Artemis Fowl book, allowing Smith’s to sell it in trade paperback format at £6.99 while the rest of the book trade were having to shift £12.99 hardbacks.  A similar controversy occurred recently when Penguin did another ‘special’ deal that meant that WH Smith Travel would only sell their Rough Guide travel books.  Competitors Lonely Planet had good reason to complain about this.  Although I think they shot themselves in the foot by announcing almost immediately afterwards that they would be opening a Lonely Planet store at Sydney airport, which presumably won’t be selling any competitors’ brands such as Rough Guide.  Of course, BBC Worldwide’s recent report regarding the losses at Lonely Planet gives a good indication why Penguin did this deal with WH Smith, as, according to Neilsen Bookscan, the travel guide market in the UK, US, and Australia has gone down by over 18%.  You have to feel sorry for the authors, as demand for exotic travel plummets during such a bad recession.
  It’s also gutting to see 100 jobs go at Penguin.  As a member of the Society of Young Publishers, I know how tough it is already to get into publishing, and announcements of such large job cuts makes it seem even more impossible.  Yet, having worked in the industry for a while, I can see from even my junior position that there is room for even more cost cutting now that Print on Demand has matured as a technology.  We may even be witnessing the first signs of a decentralisation of the industry, as London overheads prove less tolerable.  Indeed, the Internet means that you can publish from even the most far-flung places nowadays…  
  Perhaps Penguin could have saved some of their staff by not splurging so much money on Hitchhikers, as I’ve no doubt that the novel would still have been a commercial success had they allowed an unknown (and cheaper) author to take the reins.  With Eoin Colfer at the helm, I very much doubt that it’ll be an artistic success.
  
Kevin Mahoney is the SYP Web Content Editor and the Publisher and Founder of Punked Books.  Please note that these are his views only, and do not reflect those of the Society of Young Publishers as a whole. 

06 October 2009

InPrint: News

Stena Line Wigtown Book Festival 25th Sep - 4th Oct


This Autumn marks the 11th year for the internationally-acclaimed Stena Line Wigtown Book Festival. Taking place from the 25th September – 4th October in the scenic and unspoilt south west Scotland, this year’s festival promises to be one of the most successful and exciting yet, playing a key part in the Homecoming Scotland celebrations.

Plugged as ‘Hay-on-Wye with a kilt’, the festival has a particularly Scottish theme this year with the ‘Whisky and literature’ festival-within-a-festival which, along with whisky tastings and music, offers attendees a ‘whisky-themed creative writing course’. Officially classed as ‘Scotland’s National Book Town’, and with more than 20 book related businesses, I thought I would speak to Catherine Campbell to find out what exactly it means to be a book town, and to hear more about what will be happening at this year’s festival – besides a lot of whisky drinking!
 
Can you tell me how Wigtown came to be ‘Scotland’s Book Town’?
 
In 1997 there was a national competition to create ‘Scotland’s Book Town’ based broadly on Hay-on-Wye. It was designed as a way to economically regenerate a town through book tourism. The two main employers in Wigtown, the creamery and distillery, had recently closed and the town was obviously becoming run down.
Although there was much competition Wigtown won and its status was officially recognised by the new Scottish parliament. Today, more than ten years on, the change in the town is obvious. In the summer months the town is bustling, many of the buildings have been refurbished and the distillery has reopened. (Before and after pictures of the town are amazing!)
In light of the fact that many independent book stores are having such a hard time surviving, why is it that a town like Wigtown has so many thriving independent stores? Does the town attract a lot of book lovers outwith festival time?
It seems actually like Wigtown is thriving in the recession. Perhaps whereas people do not have money to spend on new books they’re happy to pick up second-hand ones. Or perhaps the people who come to Wigtown have such a passion for books that nothing would stop them! I think that this year we’ve also benefitted from the “staycationers” - people who can’t afford a foreign holiday and are happy to have a weekend in Wigtown instead.
The town certainly is busy from Easter right through the summer months. The festival is after the busy period on purpose – to entice people into the town and give the booksellers a boost before the winter.
The Festival Company also runs a Spring Weekend in April. There is a lot going on in Wigtown throughout the year including a few other book events organized by local groups. The festival company does have future plans for a writing weekend and residential courses – something to think about after the festival!
Was it initially hard to gain popularity as a festival and attract big names?
I think it was – but the ‘Book Town’ status brought a lot of publicity in the first year. Obviously our location does make it a little harder to get authors here from London etc. – but that’s part of the charm. Once they’re here a lot of them fall in love with the place and want to come back year after year. The festival has been steadily growing but last year, our tenth anniversary, was particularly successful with a 50% growth in our audience.
Can you tell us a bit about his year’s festival?
This year's festival promises to be the most exciting yet with authors appearing including Irma Kurtz, John Boyne, Nick Nairn, Giles Foden, Iain Banks, Kenny Logan, Liz Lochhead, Louis de Bernieres, David Owen, Alan Grant, Allan Little, Brian Keenan, Charlie Allan, Christopher Brookmyre, Roddy Doyle and Allan Massie as well as music, film, theatre, street entertainment, exhibitions and a continental market.
 
There is also a full children's programme including events from Babette Cole, Marcus Sedgwick, Alan Durant, John Fardell, Philip Ardagh and a special celebration of the Gruffalo’s tenth birthday with Julia Donaldson.
As part of the Homecoming Scotland celebrations, we'll also be hosting a unique mini festival celebrating the connections between whisky and writing. With music, tastings and some of the world's top whisky experts - including Charlie MacLean, Gavin Smith, Ian Buxton and Robin Laing and Dave Broom - it will appeal to anyone who has ever curled up with a book and a dram.
To request a programme or book tickets please call 01988 402 036, email mail@wigtownbookfestival.com, or see www.wigtownbookfestival.com
 Claire Robertson
13 September 2009

InPrint: News

'The Story in the Picture': Illustrated Publishing

Considering that Elephant and Castle is widely regarded in London terms as a bit ‘out of the way’ for an after work mid-week meet up, ‘The Story in the picture’ drew a respectable audience of 40+ attendees. A mixture of SYP members, college students and staff, the attentive crowd met for a rare opportunity to gather wisdom from those oft-unsung and sometimes sidelined heroes of publishing - illustrators and their trade associates. Many spectators had notebooks at the ready, and rightly so. Illustration aficionados and novices alike took home valuable knowledge and advice from the event, which threw up some contentious issues, such as why are the British public so sleepy to respond to illustration/graphic novels when in Japan they are commonplace? Though it also enjoyed some moments of humour, most notably a discussion over why most female characters in graphic novels appear as characters straight out of teenage wet dreams.
Julius Weidemann (Taschen), a native Brazilian who has lived in Germany and Japan, opened the event with a quote that got people thinking:


‘While illustration is trying to convey a message, art is the message itself’.

Whether this means that illustration utilises art’s message to fulfil a higher purpose, or alternatively that art can speak for itself where illustrated literature which is annotated cannot, the evening got off to a strong start as the audience listened on rapt. Weidemann, whose most popular series include Web Design and Digital Beauties, went on to discuss the evolving influence that technology (and all its advances) have had on illustration. He said that in the 1990s, publishers were ‘empowered by technology as much as limited by it’, explaining that publications and illustrations were often propelled in different directions than originally intended as computers would shut unintentionally. This received an audible groan from the design-orientated audience, suggesting that Julius was not alone in this experience.

The excellently comicbook-villanesqueely-named Ilya Illkillya was a real highlight of the night, with many attendees discussing the points that he raised long after the event has finished. A comicbook writer and artist whose work has been published by Marvel, DC and Dark Horse, his discussion of Manga and debate of the term ‘graphic novel’, enlightened many an attendee. The originator of the comment mentioned above regarding female fantasy roles in most comic books (‘[Illustration shouldn’t be] just drawing girls with big eyes and blue hair showing their panties’), Illikillya won over the women in the audience from the get-go.  Also describing the term ‘graphic novel’ as ‘a slight misnomer too liberally applied’, he explained that a novel suggests a ‘profound and complex structure’, which many illustrated publications, including his own, generally possess, but that some comic books should definitely not fall into the bracket of, at the risk of devaluing both comics and graphic novels by mis-classification. Illkillya also took the audience on a quick-stop tour through his own eclectic backlist, ranging from his acclaimed Manga Shakespeare series to Skidmarks; a publication that he originally printed on A4 paper and stapled together, which was spotted and published as a graphic novel in its own right. Illkillya also drove home the point that the Japanese see illustrated books as a viable alternative to ‘straight-print’ books, and all newsagents in Japan and trains are packed with graphic novels which are considered a ‘quick read’ and are often left behind for the next person to pick up and read. Still considered very much a ‘niche’ industry in the UK, illustrated publishing is still seen by the industry as for ‘few’ rather than ‘all’ and Illkillya suggested that a more outward-looking attitude from industry professionals could change the future and increase the distribution of illustrated/graphic novels.

Deirdre McDermott (Walker), the only trade publisher on the panel, has worked with illustrators such as Allan Ahlberg and is obviously passionate about illustrated publishing, possessing a lot of enthusiasm and energy onstage. Describing her mission statement as to ‘bring together words and pictures’, McDermott started her career as a picture book designer but ‘now I’m a publisher but really I’m still a designer... and I’m a big mouth!’. She stated that despite possible preconceptions about illustrated publishing, it’s still ‘all about story...everything is about story’, and described picture books as ‘a place where personal feelings and pure emotions can be displayed’. Interestingly, she also emphasised the importance of ‘leaving space’ in picture books, so that images and text can be absorbed properly by a reader and do not crowd each other out to cause confusion.

McDermott also introduced Kevin Waldron, an illustrator from Dublin whose first picture book, Mr. Peek and the Misunderstanding at the Zoo, was published by Templar in May 2008 and was shortlisted for the ‘Read it Again’ Cambridge Children’s Picture Book Award. Spotted by Walker Books by his illustrations in the Guardian newspaper, Kevin described his method as ‘I fill up notebooks [with illustrations] and keep going and going and going’. Admitting that he personally ‘didn’t get much out of it’ when talking about his degree in MA in Illustration and Animation at Kingston University, Kevin has nonetheless gone on to win the award for ‘best new illustrated book’ at Bologna Bookfair. A prime example of grass-roots productivity leading to successful and publishable titles, Kevin was humble, quietly amusing and passionate about illustration. He proves that if you’re good and you get your work out to where people can see it, the opportunities should present themselves to you in due course as long as you’re ready to take them up – encouraging news for any aspiring illustrators and, indeed, writers.

A brief question and answer session followed the speakers’ presentations and expanded on a few of the points already discussed. The audience gave a hearty round of applause, before quietly mobbing the speakers to ask for their advice and to thank them for their presentations after the event.

13 August 2009

InPrint: News

London Book Club: July

Revolutionary Road by Richard Yates

For the July book club we took a ‘long drive’ down Richard Yates’ Revolutionary Road. We all really loved the book, and it generated a great discussion. There were a few newcomers to this meeting, and they all contributed a lot to the discussion, so I felt that the book had actually served as a very good bonding tool.

A major focus of our discussion was Frank and April’s relationship. We felt sorry for Frank. However, we did notice that there was a time when Frank used April’s secrets as a weapon against her, which is quite a despicable thing to do. April trusts her husband with her most intimate thoughts and instead of helping her to deal with these issues he very spitefully taps into her vulnerability!

We then discussed April's traumatic childhood. We also observed how she likes to be left alone and actively removes herself from a situation when she can no longer tolerate it. We were intrigued by the part towards the end of the book where she writes a letter to Frank and she makes the decision to actively omit the words ‘I love you’ from the ending. In many parts of the book, April is portrayed as the perfect woman. One of the other male characters, Shep Campbell, appears to be in love with the concept of ‘April the perfect woman’ (at least in his view of April).

Our book club also noticed that the couple always feels compelled to act in a certain way (particularly Frank). After Frank cheats on April with Maureen Grubbe, he becomes overcome with guilt and suddenly feels he must do the right thing (though perhaps this would have been to not cheat on her in the first place!). We discussed the theory of there always being a 'flower' and a 'gardener' in all romantic relationships. Frank always has to put things right when the couple argues, so he appears to have taken on the role of ‘gardener’.

The other prominent family that featured in the book was the Givings. Their son, who was recovering from a mental illness, seemed to be a random character that just did not fit in with the storyline at all. However, his mother Helen was very honest about her 'flaw' (as one book club member described it), and perhaps his character served the purpose of showing just how open Helen Givings was.

Finally, we also discussed our thoughts as to why the book was called Revolutionary Road. Most of us thought it was because the story was set at Revolutionary times. However, one person suggested that the meaning of the title was two-fold. The ‘road’ was revolutionary because of the endless circles that the couple appeared to be going round and round in; hence they appeared to be going through 360 degree revolutions. We also noticed how the surname of the main couple, the Wheelers, also very neatly tied in with the book title.

30 July 2009

InPrint: News

SYP 60th Birthday Party


On 18th June, the great and the good of the publishing world helped the SYP to celebrate their 60th anniversary in the stunning surroundings of the Underglobe at London’s Globe Theatre.

Guests descended the stairs into a moodily-lit and atmospheric party space, which included a large tree as a centre-piece. Images and videos of the SYP projected on to screens on the walls, giving a flavour of the society’s work.

The party was well attended, with guests from all areas of the industry filling the large and impressive space, networking, enjoying a drink and joining in the celebratory mood.

Angie Solomon, 2009 Chair of the SYP gave a speech outlining the role of the SYP and the benefits of becoming a member, as well as letting us know about some of the society’s forthcoming events.

She then introduced Andrew Franklin, Founder and MD of Profile, who was the guest speaker for the evening.,  As a former member of the society in the 1980s, Andrew was a fitting speaker to reminisce about the SYP, particularly due to the fact that he owes his very existence to the institution where his parents met each other. When Andrew was a member, the society was going through one of its less successful phases and looked to be dying out. Andrew emphasised how genuinely happy he was to see the institution now in such capable hands and doing so well as it reached its 60th year.

Food and drink flowed plentifully – mini-dishes of sausage and mash, and fish and chips in tiny paper cones were a quirky and welcome treat!

A large and impressive birthday cake was on display, and was cut ceremonially by the committee.

The party continued into the night, with shoes being removed by many, in order to take advantage of the huge dancing space and the DJ. 

Here’s to 60 more years!

 

21 July 2009

InPrint: News

Publishing Now and Then

 

The Gennaro room at The Groucho Club was packed for the SYP’s retrospective overview of the publishing industry. Tied in to the society’s 60th anniversary celebrations, the event saw six former SYP committee members and current publishing luminaries share their memories of the industry with a receptive audience. Angie Solomon, 2009 chair of the SYP, started proceedings with a brief introduction to the society and the changes it has seen over the years. ‘Technology and society have moved forward, with a new permanence being given to people’s thoughts and experiences. The publishing industry has seen plenty of innovation and developments, not least ebooks, e-readers and the internet. New publishing companies and new retail channels have emerged.
 
‘The SYP itself has developed. It has survived economic and leadership crises, and made a reputation for itself as innovative and creative, with events such as Canon Tales.
 
‘It seems appropriate to have the event in the Groucho Club, founded by a group of leading publishers, including Liz Calder of Bloomsbury and Carmen Calil of Virago, as an alternative to the traditional ‘gentleman’s clubs’, which refused to admit women.’
 
Our first speaker was Norman Franklin, previously director and chairman of Routledge and Kegan Paul, and a member of the SYP from the 1950s. He started out in the book trade in 1949, and gave us a vivid description of the changing face of the publishing house. ‘Routledge and Kegan Paul was bombed by Hitler, but it survived,’ he said. ‘We had to use 8-pound lorries for the deliveries because the lane we were situated on was too narrow for bigger ones.’
 
‘At that time, most publishers had their own warehouse on-site. Collectors from the bookshops came in and picked up their orders at the trade counter and took them back to their shops in a sack! Invoice clerks were sent up to the looking-out floor, then came back down with the books and handed them over with an invoice. Our trade counter dated from 1890, when books would have been sold in sheets to be bound by the booksellers themselves.
 
‘The building had five floors – the basement was full of stock. The second and third floors were full of bins for looking-out books, and the loft was full of ruined books. We hauled books around by hand in a lift – it was good for the muscles!
 
‘Invoices were written out with indelible pencils – if you licked them your mouth went purple, but you couldn’t do carbons with a fountain pen.
 
‘Visitors were directed to the first floor, where the publishing office was – accounts, sales and the publishers. Accounts did everything by hand in huge ledgers. Monthly statements were usually completed by the 15th of the following months. People got paid after about two months, if they were lucky!
 
‘On the publishing side were the Managing Director, Editorial Director, Sales and Production Managers, typists, and the production department. Binding was done by binders, not printers, and nearly all books were hardcover. You’d print 3000, have 1500 bound and see how it went. Some binders would bind only 50 copies for us.

‘The staff arrived as office boys a the age of 14, then progressed to packer, invoicer, rep, and even further – you could still climb right through the ranks in those days. There were three and a half people in the sales department – one for the North (Grimsby to Aberystwyth), one for the South, the Suburban rep (who was the half), and the London rep (not Kensington or Hampstead). He called on booksellers every two weeks, carrying the books. The country reps visited their booksellers every six months, carrying jackets, blurbs and catalogues. We also mailed the catalogue to around 50 000 people, but I doubt it did any good.
 
‘Books were set in hot metal (until around 1976). It cost £10 or £12 a page. In 1976, it had gone down to £3 a page – that’s the effect of the revolution for you. The printer did the copy-editing for you, set the book and printed it. It took around twelve months from receipt of the manuscript to delivery of the finished book.
 
‘In terms of export, the most important markets were the Commonwealth ones. None of our people had ever been to America, but we did sell some books over there. The centre of gravity of English-language publishing was still London then.
 
‘In terms of editorial policy, we published any book that interested us – the list was an interesting ragbag!’
 
Next to speak was Patrick Janson-Smith, previously Publisher and joint MD of Transworld and founder of new imprint Blue Door at HarperCollins, who was a member of the SYP committee from 1970–3. He began by telling us that he had worked on the SYP committee with Gill Coleridge, who was also on the panel – of their peers on the committee, they are the only ones who are still in the book trade. Fond memories included the SYP 21st anniversary ball at Madame Tussaud’s.
 
‘The book trade was remarkably different then, with the era of buy-outs beginning,’ Patrick told us, listing a dizzying amount of circuitous buy-outs that left most of us reeling! His career began as an Assistant to the Export Publicity Manager at the University of London Press (then a division of Hodder and Stoughton), after which he worked at Granada Publishing under Carmen Calil. Granada was set up by Lord Bernstein in the 1960s, gathering together lots of independent imprints, including Mayflower and Adlard Coles. ‘It was the first ever conglomerate – the inspiration for today’s multi-nationals. I suppose what he was doing was buying respectability. That was of course in the days when publishing was still respectable – there weren’t too many celebrity biographies about.’
 
In the 1970s, Granada TV was sold to Collins, and in 1974 Patrick moved to Transworld. ‘Transworld was made up of two imprints, Bantam and Corgi, and was eventually sold to Random House to create the biggest publishing house at that time – the largest now is of course Hachette. It was a confusing but interesting time. I hope for books chronicling these seismic changes in the publishing industry!
 
‘At that time, paperbacks were sold as licenses for 7-year or other periods, from Michael Joseph, Chatto, Sidgwick and so on. It was a new thing to convert hardbacks to paperback in one publishing house. When this began to happen, it took a while to work out that Corgi’s sources were drying up!’
 
Patrick launched Black Swan in 1983, focusing on the B-format paperback. ‘It had taken me a while to work out that this was the way to go,’ he told us.
 
‘Over the past 60 years there has been a massive decrease in independent publishers,’ Patrick concluded. ‘The last 25–30 years have really been about the emergence of the big boys. In the previous 60 years, hundreds of imprints have disappeared, only to be seen on the shelves of second hand bookshops, which are also disappearing. But don’t despair, as lots of new imprints are appearing, including Blue Door! What goes around comes around, and here’s to the next 60 years.’
 
Gill Coleridge, agent at Rogers, Coleridge and White, was SYP chair in 1971, whilst working at Sidgwick and Jackson. She was junior editor at a history magazine that was bought by the company. She told of her promotion there to Sales and Marketing Director – ‘They just said to me one day, “when you come in on Monday, we’d like you to be Sales and Marketing Director for all the books”! So that was what happened. I had a department of three people. Most of the time, I was dealing with sales.
 
‘My boss found it rather difficult to have a woman on the staff. I was asked to leave the room in one editorial meeting when an American poet who had used a certain word was being discussed!
 
‘I had no one to help with the publicity so I had to learn as I went. I looked around at what others were doing; people like Liz Calder and Carmen Calil. I learnt a lot from my peers, and had to be quite brave. We published Edward Heath’s memoirs. No one really did signings then, but we hired a train and went to George’s Bookshop in Bristol, who bought firm sale, not returns, signing along the way. As signings were so rare, there was a big attendance.’
 
Book festivals were another area of her early career where Gill had to learn on the job. ‘I was expected to set up in Bedford Square, under a tent. The idea was that schools and the public met the authors. We put together a schedule of events with no budget, and charged 5 shillings for entry. 5000 people a day were expected to attend. But it was a success, and we had people like Barbara Cartland, Spike Milligan and Michael Holroyd in attendance. This was the beginning of book festivals – no one did them back then.’
 
Gill subsequently moved to Chatto and Windus as Publicity Manager. It was still independent, but was bought while she was working there. ‘There were 42 people on the staff, and I had a department of six people. One person was employed just to read the papers and cut things out to send to authors. My job was really to take out the literary editors twice a year to their favourite restaurants and to talk about our books and our catalogue and try to get the best reviewers assigned to our books. They were all male, all learned gentlemen – they were long lunches!
 
‘I also had to fix up interviews, though there were fewer then. We were allowed to read the interview and give approval in those days. We did lots of radio, and a little bit of advertising (which was marketing really) – posters, postcard, dump-bins in shops, that sort of thing. Book shops were expected to buy firm and to display the books.
 
‘I was nearly sacked three times at Chatto and Windus. The first time was when I got rid of the famous cherub colophon because I thought we needed a new look. The second was when I wore trousers to work, even though it was cold and I had ridden my bike to work. The third time was when we had a party – those were the days of regular parties – and I did a display of books at the first party I organized. “We don’t have real books,” I was told. “People will pinch them!” So I had to find dummies and rejacket them all.
 
‘We had lots of fun and parties at the SYP as well. I remember the 21st anniversary party at Madame Tussaud’s, and we held a New Year’s Eve party at Café Royale.
 
‘Marketing hardly existed in those days. The first really major marketing campaign was done by the first Marketing Director at Hutchinson, with Day of the Jackal. He purposefully left a folder marked ‘top secret’ in a taxi, and the plot became headline news. Everyone wanted the book then, it was really creative and innovative.
 
‘Communication in those days was by letter. We had no internet, of course, which is what has really changed publicity and marketing. Communication these days is instant, which creates lots of pressure. We thought that we were busy but it is nothing compared to now. There were hardly any agents around then: it was a different world.’
 
Next up was Nick Jones, founder of Strathmore Publishing, who was chair of the SYP in 1979. He began by reminiscing about when the SYP kitted out a routemaster bus and went to the Vauxhall factory at Luton to hand out books, though not very successfully. He showed us the artwork for the previous anniversary (30th). ‘The SYP is much more wise now – more organized and sophisticated.’
 
Nick went on to talk about his own career and how the SYP played its part. He displayed some covers of old copies of InPrint, which looked very different in those days.
 
At the age of 12, Nick became interested in printing and typography, so decided he might like to work in publishing. He studied Biological Sciences, so assumed that he would go into scientific publishing, but Thompson offered him a place on its training scheme, and he ended up at Michael Joseph, which was then owned by the Illustrated London News, which also owned publishers such as Hamish Hamilton. ‘The owner, Lord Thompson, had a stack of books on his desk from all his publishers, which he tried to read but never managed to get through!’
 
Nick stayed at Michael Joseph for three years, and then moved to Thames Television. He told us how publishing in conjunction with TV was more general then. ‘Now, we have to think of a book as the start of potential media interest, but then you could put out a TV series on gardening and 50 000 copies of the book would sell.
 
‘My next place of employment was the Royal Institute of British Architects. Hidden, specialist publishers like this are more visible now. You used to have to go to their shop, but now there’s the internet.’
 
Nick went on to set up Strathmore Publishing, which began as production and editorial services – ‘a gap in the market that came out of the last recession. Without the contacts I made in the SYP, I wouldn’t have been nearly so confident with Strathmore. We also publish audio books – the one bit of digital publishing that actually makes any money. Because the product is already digital, selling audio books doesn’t actually force the consumer into a different reading experience.’
 
Nick then read from the first issue of InPrint he wrote for as chair, in February 1979, where he ‘set out his stall for the year. We took our responsibilities seriously. Publishing is still about the same things – communicating from someone who knows something to someone who wants to know – but the method of delivery has changed.’
 
He also told us some of the subjects of speaker meetings in his year as chair, including Publishing and the Law, Rights, Don’t Forget the Author, and Publishing: A Job or a Way of Life? ­– to which Anthony Cheetham apparently replied ‘why do the two things have to be mutually exclusive?’ Nick’s parting advice was not to just publish books that you want to read – ‘the commercial part is great fun – getting the right mix is what it’s all about.’
 
Victoria Nicholl is Audio Editor at Orion, and was Chair of the SYP in 2005. The focus of her talk was technology and publishing. ‘I couldn’t do without it. When the e-reader came out in the US, I had to get one to know how it worked. But however exciting and easy to use technology is, it is a tool. People need to be aware of how to use it effectively. In publishing, people used to use typewriters, and colour books had to be stuck together – it was very labour intensive. If you wanted to know the length of a manuscript, you had to count it word by word – which is how I earned her pocket money as a child.
 
‘Despite the fact that computers have apparently made life easier, the abundance of options has actually increased our workloads. There are so many variations, it’s not whether to do it, it’s how – which social networking site, which program. Technology is now directing some of the decisions we make. Companies such as Sony, Lightning Source and Apple have made far-fetched ideas a reality. Even though email has made life ‘easier’ in theory, some companies are actually asking their staff to talk more.
 
‘Data storage has completely changed – no more floppy disks. CDs, DVDs, internal servers are all options. It is still expensive to store large quantities of data, but it is getting cheaper. Data organization is very important – the central database that feeds information to the outside world. It is still labour intensive, as someone has to enter the information, which is of vital importance as it will feed to places like Amazon, and will affect the way that people in the outside world see a company. Not all data records are created equal! The more information it holds, the better it’ll work. It may not seem like the most exciting task, but accurate data entry is actually extremely important.
 
‘In the end,’ Victoria concluded, ‘technology is just a tool, albeit a useful one. Publishing is a creative industry, and there is only so much we can do with technology alone. The ability to communicate successfully is the important thing.’
 
Last to speak was Suzanne Collier of BookCareers.com, who was chair of the SYP at least four times between 1989 and 1998. She started in publishing in 1983 at ‘premiere independent literary house Andre Deutsch. Diana Athill was the principle editor. It was run by Andre Deutsch, who was the sole owner. We published 80 books a year, including literary fiction, general fiction, non-fiction and children’s books, and around 40 people worked there. Authors and brands ranged from John Updike and V.S. Naipaul to Postman Pat.
 
‘Andre Deutsch was fierce but fair, and was a great friend to his employees. I always addressed his as “Mr. Deutsch” – this wouldn’t happen anywhere now. My job was office junior. My timetable included work in every single department, and I helped out wherever was necessary. I covered reception at lunchtime, franked mail, and delivered parcels to Bedford Square, which was the hub of the publishing world in those days.
 
‘After a year, Mr. Deutsch sold 50 per cent of his shares in the company to Tom Rosenthal, and they became joint managing directors. The first time I saw Tom I didn’t know how he was, so I stopped him on the stairs and challenged him – he just said “I’m the new managing director”! I couldn’t believe I’d done this – this was a time when people were being fired left, right and centre from publishing so I was a bit worried!
 
‘Our offices were in Great Russel Street. The top floor had to be kept as residential accommodation, so the publishers entertained in the dining room of “the flat”, and were catered for by Andre’s personal chef, Pierrot.
 
‘We reused every envelope and jiffy bag, had low watt bulbs in the loos and I delivered parcels by hand to save money. We walked everywhere and never took a taxi, though when Tom started he took taxis and even dined out!
 
‘In the basement were rotting royalty statements, cockroaches, and the editorial department, excluding Diana Athill! The photocopier was also down there, though there was no feeder or sorter. I remember having to photocopy a 1000 page manuscript six times for an editorial meeting – it took me three days! But at least it meant I could read what I was photocopying, and I actually learnt from it.’
 
Suzanne rose through the ranks at Andre Deutsch, and at one time or another worked in pretty much every area of the publishing industry. ‘Eventually, Andre Deutsche became Tom’s company, but whenever I lined up the letter-head paper I looked at the name at the top – Andre Deutsch – not the directors’ names at the bottom.  I was there for seven years, from when I was 16, when I left school. Six years later, I was the youngest person ever to chair the SYP. I couldn’t have achieved this much at any other company – at Andre Deutsch I was encouraged at every single turn. One of the children’s editors, Pamela Royd, knew that I wrote poetry, and asked to see it. She sent it on to one of the children’s authors, who sent me a lovely letter back – it was actually Michael Rosen. I hope for the same opportunities and encouragement for everyone here.
 
‘I started giving careers advice when I was at the SYP, which lead to me starting BookCareers.com. I did my first salary survey in 1995 – and I really feel strongly that these things need to be spoken about, to get you all the salaries you deserve.’
 
Finally, we returned to Nick, as the visual aspect of his presentation had been interrupted by a technical hitch. He showed us pictures of Foyles then and now to illustrate the difference in bookselling these days, as well as an image of Waterstones, which ‘revolutionised bookselling. The vision was to make books sexy and put them on the high street. Foyles had to respond.
 
‘During the 70s, you had to apply to a government department to put up the price of a book. Now it’s hard to track prices, what with three-for-twos and other promotions.  The supermarkets never got involved until the net book agreement ended – it was a different world. Now, Amazon sells 85 per cent of the 12 per cent of books that are sold through the internet.’

The evening concluded with questions from the floor, including whether there are too few men in publishing and whether it should be acceptable to use work experience people for long periods of time without paying them. As always, debate could have raged on for the remainder of the evening, but instead we moved on for some valuable SYP networking over drinks, after the presentation of the new SYP60 website by Jon Slack and Bhav Mehta.

23 June 2009

InPrint: News

The International SYP conference

The first ever International Society of Young Publishers Conference took place at this year’s London Book Fair. It was an opportunity to bring together young publishers from all over the world, and with six panellists and around seventy young publishers in attendance it was an exciting venture.

The conference was a huge success, as the session discussed how our foreign counterparts run their own young publishers’ societies and opened communication for future international ventures.

Chairing the discussion was Emma House, International Director of the Publishers Association. On the panel we had the SYP’s very own Jon Slack, SYP Chair 2008 and International SYP Co-ordinator, and Louise Rhind-Tutt, SYP Chair 2006 and Publicity Manager of CCV, Random House UK. Also speaking were Gesa Jung, co-chair of Junge Verlags Menschen (Young Professionals in Publishing) in Germany, Henrik Ægidius from Ægidius Publishing, former honorary treasurer of Forening for Forlagsfolk (Danish Association of People in Publishing) in Denmark and Chris Gruppetta, the Chair of International Young Publishing Entrepreneur Award (British Council) and also Director of Publishing at Merlin Library in Malta.

After a short introduction from Jon, the conference began with the premiere of the new SYP video. The brand new video contains information and images about the SYP, as well as some fascinating photographs taken by past and present members. The photographs included those from the boating trips, picnics, conferences and highlighted the friendly, social atmosphere of the society.

We then heard from our speakers, who all ran their own publishing societies in their respective countries. There was some interesting discussion on various issues relating to international publishing, as well as the issues facing different young publishers.

We all know about the recession and the credit crunch, but Louise Rhind-Tutt raised the issue of financing a publishing society. She was chair of the SYP in 2006 and she told delegates that when she took over as chair of the SYP there was no money in the treasury, so they had to market the society in order to get money through membership and events.

Another issue raised was how publishing societies are started. Gesa Jung from Junge Verlags Menschen discussed how the society she belongs to in Germany came into being. Their society began through a series of informal social events during which they realised the importance of contacts and networking – they subsequently set up their own society of young publishers.

Our panellists also discussed getting local businesses involved in publishing societies. Chris Gruppetta mentioned that in Malta the publishing industry is very small, and so it can be difficult to get a society running. However, Henrik Ægidius was enthusiastic about how, in his experience, local businesses have allowed members to learn more about the industry, leading to some important connections being made.

In the second half of the conference the floor was open to delegates, who were representing countries including India, America and the far reaches of Europe. The discussion began with how other countries could set up their own equivalents of the SYP. Most of the international delegates agreed on the importance of having their own SYP – the main benefits being the ability to network, make contacts, learn more about the industry and generally make new friends.

It was encouraging to see how many delegates were in attendance at this year’s first international conference. The work that the SYP does is clearly spreading throughout the world, which is an exciting and encouraging thought! It will be interesting to see what happens in the coming years, as now the connections and discussions have began between UK SYP and the rest of the world.

Kathryn Langley

02 June 2009

InPrint: News

Publishing Now and Then

The InPrint Online review of Publishing Now and Then, our first event to celebrate the SYP's 60th birthday, will follow shortly.  In the meantime, you can download a podcast of Suzanne Collier's talk, read Patrick Janson-Smith's article in BookBrunch, and there is a copy of Nicholas Jones' talk below.  Both Suzanne and Nicholas are previous Chairs of the SYP.  Suzanne Collier is the Founder and Business Manager of BookCareers.com, Patrick Janson-Smtih is Publisher of the new HarperCollins Blue Door imprint, and Nicholas Jones is the Founder and MD of Strathmore Publishing.

Here is Nicholas Jones' talk:

My brief today is to talk about what the SYP was like in my time, and a little about my own career and the part the SYP played in it, and a bit about how publishing has changed, with specific reference to prices. It really concentrates the mind trying to pick the important, the trends, from the minutiae, and also trying to point to things the Society might like to note and respond to.

I decided to a good approach would be to look through the copies of InPrint from my year, but before then I want to give a straightforward background, so you know what experience underlies what I say. Some of the moves I’ve made and choices I’ve taken might seed ideas about possible career paths in the minds of would-be and recent entrants in this audience, so I hope a little autobiography will be useful rather than indulgent.

From an early age – 12 or so – I had been interested in typography and printing, and owned a small letterpress printing press – a technology almost completely irrelevant today, but it gave me a headstart in getting publishing companies to talk to me when I applied for jobs. I’d studied medical science at university, and scientific publishing seemed a good combination of those interests. However, the Thomson Newspaper Group – early entrants into electronic publishing and now part of Thomson Reuters, then owned several book publishing companies and ran a general training scheme. So I worked for Michael Joseph – who are now part of Penguin. After three years there, I moved to Thames Television, the largest company of a then federal ITV, to publish books based on their programmes. Those were the days when a 7-part history of English Gardens could be shown on ITV1 (of course there wasn’t a ITV2 then) and get an audience of 7 million! The accompanying book sold 53,000. After that, I spent 8 years with the Royal Institute of British Architects, producing books for architects, but also responsible for their specialist bookshops; then in 1995 I established Strathmore Publishing to be an editorial and production services company. In 1995, the publishing industry was just coming out of a recession and many firms had over-contracted, so needed assistance as the lists grew again. I could put to use my technical knowledge of print.

Since we are celebrating 60 years of the SYP, I want to say that my involvement with it has proven invaluable in making contacts which have founded great friendships and been a steady source of work and opportunities.

Although Strathmore still produces printed books, we have found a particular niche in recording audiobooks, which having once been a product solely for the visually impaired now find themselves centre stage as, to quote a senior executive at Random House last year, audiobooks are the one bit of digital publishing actually making money.

That prompts a comment: because they are already digital, selling them online doesn’t require the audience to accept a fundamentally different reading experience, which is still the case with e-books. So it is interesting to note that in America, whose experiences often predict our own to a great extent, has seen the sales of audiobooks as physical product (i.e. CDs) fall by 21 per cent, and downloads are 15 per cent of sales by volume, perhaps 10 per cent by value. The SYP might like to consider if and how e-books are going to achieve that – the US figures indicate that last year they were a mere 0.1 per cent by value.

So, as I said, I dug out my old copies of InPrint. In the February 1979 issue I wrote a piece outlining my ideas for the year. I quoted from Ian Norrie’s wonderfully comprehensive history of Publishing and Bookselling, which had been published in 1974, and although that is now mostly of historic interest, it is good to see that Tuesday last week saw in BookBrunch a review of his just-published memoir, The Business of Lunch: A Bookman’s Life and Travels. Ian ran the independent High Hill Bookshop in Hampstead for thirty years – indeed, I briefly worked there, a placement arranged by Michael Joseph, whose training scheme was admirably comprehensive.

Here’s what Ian wrote 35 years ago:

“The Society of Young Publishers was formed in 1949, reflecting the postwar determination of a new generation to make a better job of it than their fathers had.”

That prompts a little diversion: note the I’m-sure-unconscious sexism in that statement – it was pretty much true in the prewar days than men ran publishing, though now, according to Suzanne Collier’s recent salary sample, it is an industry with more than 80 per cent female staff. When I worked at the then independent Michael Joseph, the Chairman and half the board of directors was female, but I think that was unusual. It seems – and maybe Suzanne will tell us more later – that what gender you happen to be is still an issue which influences your pay and progress in the industry.

The SYP took its responsibilities seriously. You’ll see in that same issue a piece about trying to establish a publishing creche.

Anyway, Ian continued:

“The Society provided a regular platform for the new entrants to the trade from which they could air their grievances and make, in their turn, recommendations for curing its chronic sickness. The subjects of their meetings dealt with the necessity for more and better bookshops, co-operative advertising, the death of fiction, broadening the market for books, and so on.”

Reading that now, I realise that what publishing is fundamentally about - communicating ideas from those who know to those who want to know – hasn’t changed all that much. But the way we create what we sell, how we sell it, and how we make a living from this activity, is fundamentally different. Victoria Nicholl is going to be picking up this aspect, the technological revolution, in the next section tonight.

The first speaker meeting was Publishing and the Law – well, copyright protection has become a hot issue in a way that no one might have foreseen then, but some bon mots remain worth quoting: a partner in Goodman Derrick – a practice which today specialises in media rights clearances for the digital world – remarked:  “publishing contracts tend to be pretty general documents, which is OK if the book succeeds, but disputes arise if either party feels the other hasn’t fulfilled their part of the bargain.” As true as ever.

In introducing that meeting, I quoted from an article by Anthony Burgess – author of A Clockwork Orange – which had just appeared in the Guardian.

“If to publish is to make public, then you can publish – if you’re not too ambitious or greedy, without publishers. Not even in the days of Shakespeare or Dr Johnson was it necessary to have a Faber or a Heinemann.” He goes on to argue that “publisher and author have a sense of distrust and grudging mutual admiration. Both sides want books to sell, but they want them to sell for different reasons: for their intrinsic excellence the one, for their intrinsic saleability the other. Soon the question may be asked: what exactly is a publisher? And the answer could be: not Macmillan or Gollancz, but a boy or girl with access to an electric typewriter and a Xerox machine.”

I think Burgess is rather high-minded – many authors are mostly or even entirely interested in saleability and money – but the principle is probably true, and though the technology has changed, the idea was – as so often with his ideas – remarkably prescient. The US journal of the booktrade Publishers Weekly reported just yesterday that for the first time the number of self-published titles in the US – 285,000 – topped the number of traditionally published titles – 275,000. That change has been facilitated, if not entirely driven, by new technologies.

In April,  the subject was Rights. Nicholas Kennedy from Marshall Cavendish was forthright: “If you’ve haven’t got rights, you have nothing. You editors are making a physical product for the selling of rights. We, who sell things, are the financial lifeblood of the firm.”

I am reminded of a remark I remember from Dick Douglas-Boyd, then Sales Director of Michael Joseph: “The Editorial Department’s job is to find good products for the sales department to sell.” At the time, he said it jokingly (it was at the Christmas party), but now, I suspect that really is the case – no doubt those with recent experience in trade publishing will confirm.

Also in the issue of InPrint reporting that meeting is a first notice of the SYP Handbook – which was gradually to become Giles Clark’s standard work Inside Book Publishing.

In June, we discussed: ‘Is Publishing Just a Job or a Way of Life?’ Speakers included Anthony Cheetham – now where did he go? – and the heads of Hutchinson and Chatto (both now part of Random House). I note from the write up that “Anthony Cheetham found the question irritating. ‘I really do not see a contradiction between the two. There is a very British point of view that somehow the world owes us a living and we don’t have to be professional about it.’ ” Still true, I wonder? Is the desire to work in publishing still keeping down salaries (Suzanne??). He goes on to say that you musn’t want to publish only books that you yourself want to read (though, he says,  “that approach can work well – look at Thames and Hudson”), but that “the whole commercial process can be great fun; getting the right mix in its infinite variety.”

The July meeting examined the importance of picture selection. We were honoured to have Harold Evans, then editor of the Sunday Times, before he and Tina Brown went to the States. Imagine a time when photo libraries were hundreds of filing cabinets, and retouching required the skills of an artist with an airbrush. Now, pictures can be selected almost entirely online – another fundamental change in the process of producing books which I suspect most of those in this room will have taken for granted.

September saw a discussion of direct mail. Still relevant, even if the medium is more likely to be e-mail. Interestingly, one of the speakers was Marketing Director of the Folio Society, an organisation flourishing today because it offers books primarily as objects. That reminds me of an article in the Guardian only last week commenting on the current trend of retro books – things like the Dangerous Book for Boys – which depend for their appeal on the look perhaps more than the content.

October discussed whether production standards were declining. The impact of technology again. And ever-increasing paper prices. And falling print runs making it difficult to amortise the origination costs. All in all, plus ça change.

November saw a discussion called ‘Don’t Forget the Author’, which included Thomas Pakenham, author of The Boer War and subsequently the ‘Remarkable Trees’ books, Jane Aiken Hodge, humorist Miles Kington, and publisher Christopher Sinclair-Stevenson, then at Hamish Hamilton – which is now Penguin – and both author and agent. That takes us neatly back to Anthony Burgess – though the meeting seems to have been amicable enough. Authors concluded they did need publishers – so that they could concentrate on writing while the publisher got on with the production and dissemination of what the author wrote.

So the principles of publishing are very similar, but the landscape in which we operate has changed completely.

Bestseller lists are now the lifeblood of publicity and marketing, but the Sunday Times list began in 1967 with a sample of only 18 shops – and that was a survey by phone. It was often said that the list was books the shops wanted to sell (or which they had subscribed lots of) rather than what was actually selling. One London evening paper sampled only Foyles and W. H. Smith! It wasn’t until 1976 that an independent organisation was set up to generate bestseller lists based on the  systematic collection of sales info. based on more than a hundred shops. Computers and EPOS, and the entry of Nielsen Bookdata into the market have transformed that – the charts are now based on 8,500 outlets. But has that very accuracy reduced the range of books available by making publishers chase what they perceive as successful genres at the expense of originality?

Were books good value for money then? Are they now? The best price statistics I can find show that with a base of 100 in 1974, prices in general were up to 223.5, and by 2008, up to nearly 850. Book prices are hard to track, but an average novel was about £3.50 in 1979. The average now is about £12 at actual selling price (though £15 or so rrp), showing that books have broadly kept in line with the RPI. But of course there has been a fundamental change: the Net Book Agreement, which existed from 1900 to about 1995 is no longer active. It prevented anyone selling books at less than the price set by the publisher, allowing, in effect, cross-subsidy between popular bestsellers and worthy or experimental material. The agreement went gradually: once a few firms (led by Hodder Headline) ignored it, it became unsustainable, though it was not formally abolished until March 1997. Interestingly, it has been successfully defended in 1962, when the idea that ‘books are different’ because each is individual was accepted by the Restrictive Practices Court. But market forces can be more powerful than courts.

The revolution on the High Street brought about by chain booksellers like Waterstones is remarkable – some of you may remember the arcane system (at Foyles) by which you had to queue up three times, once to get a bill for your books, then to pay at a separate cashier, then collect the books. The only other place where that happened, to my knowledge, was the GUM store in communist Russia.

So bookselling has undergone a revolution since 1979. Supermarkets accounted for no sales in 1979; 4 per cent of total consumer market (tcm) in 2000, 8 per cent by 2008. They entered the book market entirely because of the abolition of the NBA. And then, of course, there is the internet: Amazon was founded in the US in 1995, operated in the UK from 1998, and now has 85 per cent of the UK tcm which is 12 per cent of booksales and rising fast.

I want to end with a comment I heard recently which I feel neatly summarise what publishing ought to be: “The process of reading should be seductive, interesting, worthwhile, tempting.” Who said it? Paul Le Clerk, President of the New York Public Library. It’s absolutely true, I think, of printed books – though it must be added that he said it in response to a question about whether he enjoyed reading e-books. It was, he said, entirely possible to meet those requirements with a Kindle.

These are interesting times – but then they probably always have been, and the SYP will continue to be forum for discussion and for sharing knowledge. It seems to be in very good hands.

26 May 2009

InPrint: News

London Book Club: May

Just one month after the 70th anniversary of the publication of The Grapes of Wrath, our book club met at Waterstone’s to discuss the John Steinbeck classic. The book, which is set at the time of The Great Depression, was originally published in New York by Viking Press on April 14, 1939 (the fourth anniversary of Black Sunday) and won the 1940 Pulitzer Prize.

 

Although the focus of our discussion was primarily The Grapes of Wrath, most of us had read Steinbeck’s Of Mice and Men when we were at school, and so we could not help but to compare and contrast the two books at various stages of our discussion.

 

We found the first 100 pages quite tiresome, but we thought the story got much better when Tom Joad (who is the first main character that readers are introduced to) goes home and is reunited with his family. Someone recollected that the storyline of Of Mice and Men was also quite slow to begin.

           

We did feel that halfway through the story, Tom Joad’s character completely changes. There were some other real ‘characters’ in the book: an ex-preacher who causes quite a stir at one of the camps, and also Uncle John, who on meeting the ex-preacher finds it hard to contain details of his ‘immoral past’. Then there’s Connie, who on first inspection appears to be a loving husband and dutiful son-in-law promising to build a better life for his wife and unborn child, and then later on lets everyone down by disappearing. The relationship between Tom’s parents is beautifully described. Steinbeck highlights how the couple have known each other for so long that they are able to control one another’s behaviour, and prevent the other one from becoming too strong-willed.

 

We noticed how the Depression led to a detachment of men from labour, and felt that this parallels current times where many people are finding it hard to get a job. There was a huge  emphasis on the mother looking after her family. However, because the women were doing the housework and looking after the children, when the men became unemployed, they no longer had a role. We noticed how this domination by the female sex throughout the book is a sharp contrast to that in Of Mice and Men, where the focus is on the male sex (the only female in the book being Curly’s wife).

 

We were still a bit baffled about the difference between a depression and a recession (and I imagine it’s something we all should know in light of the current climate!). However, after a few minutes of debate, we came to the conclusion that a recession is when the banks are having an economic crisis, and thought that perhaps a depression is possibly the next stage after a recession. It’s ironic how in The Grapes of Wrath, the economic crisis causes problems for the bank, but with our situation the bank is actually the cause of the economic crisis.

 

Quite a few people felt that there was a sense of repetitiveness throughout the book. The storyline seemed to consist of an endless cycle of driving, finding somewhere to camp, looking for work, having to move on and then start driving again. Also, Steinbeck appeared to have used a technique throughout the book where he would make a sweeping statement about the kind of suffering that all Okies (nickname given to people from Oklahoma) are going through, and then back up this statement by giving an example using a scene from the Joad family’s life, thus using the example to make his point a second time.

 

The setting for Of Mice and Men and The Grapes of Wrath is a farm or farmland. However, in contrast to Of Mice and Men, which is a hopeful story about the ‘All American Dream’, in The Grapes of Wrath there is no mention of the ‘All American Dream’!

 

A recent article on the BBC’s website states that The Grapes of Wrath is actually included in the American Library Association’s list of the 100 most frequently banned or challenged books. People were put off by the amount of detail that the book goes into. When the book was published, business was booming in England, so we were curious to know what the British reaction was. The book is known to be disliked by Christians. We thought that this is because of the not-so-religious ex-preacher Casy, who has a very unconventional way of saying grace, and also has an unusual way of defining sin.

 

We were fascinated by the hatred for the Okies for being the outsiders and foreigners to California. We were also intrigued by the fact that people disliked ‘Reds’ for simply wanting to be paid 30 cents an hour instead of the new going rate of 25, yet at the same time we were astounded by the generosity of all the people at the tent cities, and we felt that the storyline was actually heartwarming as well as tragic.

 

Before I had finished reading the book, someone else on the SYP committee had told me that there was a sad part towards the end of the story. Everyone who’d managed to get as far as the end (it’s a long book!) felt that the ending was quite shocking, and disturbing in a Little Britain-esque way. One can only imagine that the reason this part was added to the story is again to build on the concept of the generosity of strangers. Perhaps this shocking ending is another of the reasons why the book was banned.

 

We were a little puzzled by the title of the book, although the family did end up picking grapes when they went to California, and also someone in our group mentioned that they thought the last chapter was about the grapes of wrath. To me, this highlights what a book club is all about: one or many people might be puzzled by some aspect of the book, but yet someone else in the group whose experience when reading the book was different to yours, might just be able to come along and answer your question for you.

25 May 2009

InPrint: News

Graphic Novels and the Rise of Manga Publishing in the UK

It was sweltering inside, and a gorgeous breezy evening taunted us from the other side of the window. Few people attended the Manga publishing talk, but maybe it was only going to be the geekiest of us anyway.

A shame, if so – both speakers represented an atypical, down to earth subgroup. Emma Hayley was the founder of Self Made Hero, best known for its Manga Shakespeare series. Lizzy Spratt commissions graphic novels for Walker Books.

Manga is growing. According to Emma Hayley, the market for it doubled in size between 2005–7. In 2007, Japanese Manga accounted for 70% of graphic novel sales, although its UK share was a more modest 15%. No longer a pursuit for Japan-obsessed geeks, it’s now a pursuit for multicultural geeks of all flavours. Fun fact – the fastest growing manga genre is Yaoi, male-on-male homoerotica that’s most popular with adolescent girls.

But today’s speakers were more family-friendly. Both their booklists are largely pitched at children and young adults – Walker’s specifically so, SMH’s out of a pragmatism born of GCSE literature syllabi. Emma compared Manga Shakespeare to Baz Luhrmann’s adaptation of Romeo and Juliet. Each story is modernised, at the least. The star-crossed lovers court and die under Tokyo’s skyline. Hamlet is cyberpunk. The original texts have been pruned to suit the format, but otherwise left untouched.

For those who thought pruning Shakespeare sacrilegious, Emma showed some earlier graphic novel/Shakespeare experiments from the 1950s – bloated monologues delivered by pompous caricatures who were almost squeezed off the page by the enormous speech bubbles they competed with. Manga Shakespeare unquestionably showed more respect for the artist and medium, letting the pictures create as much of a narrative as the text.

In fact, Emma ‘didn’t want the series to be associated with Shakespeare’ – rather, she wanted it to ‘shock’. The enterprise has been one of English publishing’s recent success stories. Self Made Hero sold out of their original (undisclosed) print run within six months. Emma also won the UK Young Publishing Entrepreneur of the Year award in 2008.

Next steps on her path to world domination, she says, are developing their Eye Classics series (other literary works set to more Western illustrations) and moving into graphic biographies – starting with Johnny Cash.

It turns out that Japanese follow the educational logic of manga even further – Emma said that you can find manga maths in Japan, if you search hard enough!

If you’re thinking about writing or publishing manga yourself, Emma recommended seeking artists at Sweatdrop Studios, a UK-based collective of mangaka (artists).

Someone asked about the creative process itself. It sounded comparable to a play, albeit with more feedback – the author/editor puts together a script of sorts, which could be stuffed with directions or left solely to the artist. The artist fills in the blanks, and then they negotiate over any disagreements, before producing the final product.

Up next was Lizzy Spratt. Her talk contained less factoids than the first, and focussed more on her own company, with less emphasis on the industry as a whole. Walker publishes children’s books, and is no stranger to dense illustration, having published the legendary Where’s Wally? series.

Lizzy was starting a graphic novel list, and most of the talk focussed around its forthcoming and newly published titles. These included Skim, a graphic novel for young adults dealing with depression and suicide; Outlaw, a Robin Hood interpretation; Vermonia, a manga series/computer game crossover and Salem Brownstone. The latter is one of Lizzie’s first books for Walker, and obviously her pet project. In a real coup for a unknown author/editor team, it’s been endorsed by Alan Moore, author of V for Vendetta and Watchmen, and god of Western graphic novels.

The warped, gothic look of the book led to a discussion of age ratings on books – a pointless exercise, Lizzy claimed. Even without sex or violence a text might not appeal to younger readers, but why tell them not to read it?

20 May 2009

InPrint: News

Getting Ahead in Publishing

A room of hopeful faces rose early for the Society of Young Publishers’ 9:30am seminar on ‘Getting Ahead in Publishing’, which kicked off the London Book Fair on Monday morning. Those among us looking for the secret to getting a foot in the door in publishing were eager to hear the advice of the panel: Kate O’Connor, Executive Director of Skillset; Desmond O’Rourke, Treasurer of the UK Association for Publishing Education and Director of the MA in Publishing at LCC; Nancy Roberts, Production Manager at Dorling Kindersley; and Gavin Sharrock, Journal Publisher at Wiley Blackwell.

There were no revelations, it must be said, as to how one can get in and move up in the industry, but there were quite a few helpful and optimistic tips to help aspiring publishers at every level.

Education
Both Kate O’Connor and Desmond O’Rourke spoke about the importance of qualifications and the many ways in which they can be attained. From short courses in specific areas of publishing with the Publishing Training Centre; more general postgraduate courses at the likes of Oxford Brookes and Stirling University to more specific, production-geared courses, there is something to suit everyone’s tastes and budgets. O’Rourke has run a very successful initiative with the Arts Council to provide ethnic minority graduates with MA scholarships, and internships within several of the major UK publishing houses. Getting into a company and doing hands-on work can often be a means to making yourself indispensable: Nancy Roberts hosted an intern at DK and when the internship ended, immediately hired her as a permanent member of staff.

Getting the job
Roberts emphasised the importance of making your CV stand out from the pile – jobs advertised in the national press can attract up to 2,000 applicants for a single position. How can you make yours jump out? A snappy mission statement that can be quickly read can help to convey your message if you have something particular you want to highlight, but make it individual, not general. Of utmost importance is checking for errors: any CVs with typos will be thrown straight in the bin. Consider registering with a recruitment consultant as well as applying for roles directly: they know the industry well and can help get the good CVs straight to the publishers.

Some words of wisdom
Gavin Sharrock has worked in journal publishing with Wiley since the beginning of his career, and his succinct advice pertains to everyone in the industry, whether you’re getting your first job or seeking a promotion or change of role.

1. Don’t do anything stupid
2. Try to stand out
3. Stack the odds in your favour

To elaborate on these wise words, Sharrock says that you should be prepared for seemingly simple questions in any interview, like ‘Why do you want to go into publishing?’ Loving books is not enough, but you must be passionate about what it is that drew you to publishing. Think about it, and know what you’re going to say before you get there. Standing out and stacking the odds in your favour go hand in hand, and there are so many simple things you can do online that will help with this: getting a profile on LinkedIn helps with networking and making contacts, and using Twitter keeps you up to date with current news and allows you to become part of the online community of publishers. Read related blogs, or write your own, and whatever you’re doing online, shout about it on your CV - as long as the content is appropriate for employers’ eyes.

A lot of very helpful advice then, from a panel remaining realistic but positive about the future for young publishers in this exciting, challenging time.

Elaina O'Neill

12 May 2009

InPrint: News

Bring-A-Friend Social

On the 8th of April, members of the SYP came together at Digress in Soho for the first committee social of the year. There was a great turn out for the event as both old and new members of the society got together to network over some drinks. In a new twist to the committee social, this time the theme was to ‘bring-a-friend’. There were lots of new faces to be seen as regular members brought along their work colleagues and their friends who had always wondered what the SYP was about, but had never managed to come to one of our events.
 

It was a great chance for everyone to meet the committee and find out more about our 60th anniversary plans, plus there was lots of talk about the upcoming London Book Fair! The networking was helped along by plenty of free wine and nibbles. Keep your eyes open for forthcoming socials planned later in the year…

12 May 2009

InPrint: News

Canon Tales: Chapter 2

After last year’s huge success, Jon Slack and Doug Wallace decided to take Canon Tales into the second round on 21st April at the London Book Fair 2009. The former chairs of the SYP (2008 and 2007 respectively) invited 12 guest speakers to share their publishing stories, be it about how they got into publishing, what inspires them, or simply what makes this industry as creative as it is. Their stories were accompanied by a backdrop of 20 images per speaker, each shown for 21 seconds, thus giving each speaker 7 minutes in total.

After a brief introduction it was time for the first speaker of the evening to take the stage: Peter Collingridge, managing director of Apt Studio. According to him he only got to where he is now by failure, and therefore encouraged the audience to fail enthusiastically. His slides showed pictures of milestones in his career and how each failure bore a new opportunity. Personal pictures and anecdotes about his time at university and trying to be a Hip-Hop DJ among other things made for a very entertaining start to the evening. He ended his talk with Beckett’s famous words: ‘Ever tried. Ever failed. No matter. Try again. Fail again. Fail better.’

Next up was Reg Wright, director of Hothouse Fiction. He, too, talked about failure and how it can inspire creative need. Showing pictures of Hothouse titles, he explained how they conduct research and work closely with authors to develop ideas and turn an original idea into a great manuscript, leaving the audience to decide whether the type of research they do falls under science or is in fact creative.

If you want to know what it’s like to give a book to the Queen you should talk to Jamie Byng, MD of Canongate. Showing pictures of Canongate’s original logo and how it changed, as well as pictures of writers he works with and covers of landmark titles, he talked about Canongate’s different ‘canons’, ranging from alternative over black to pocket canons, where they succeeded in making the Bible new and accessible. He ended his passionate talk by stating that ‘it’s not about you, it’s not about Canongate, it’s about books’.

Rebecca Lee graduated from City University last year where she did her MA in Publishing. She talked about her route into publishing, which was paved with an ‘overkill’ of placements, and about the invaluable insights one can gain from seemingly endless filing duties. While some people say that in London you are never further than three feet away from a rat, Rebecca claimed that that’s true for publishers as well.

The next speaker was Peggy Vance from Dorling Kindersley. In her very energetic talk (at one point there were sweets flying through the room), she introduced the audience to DK’s upcoming title All This Makes Life Worth Living. Sample pages from the book included images of a Penguin paperback, Jimmy Hendrix’s guitar, a UN peace keeping helmet and Monet’s glasses, to name only a few.

Roger Bratchell, marketing director at Random House, started his talk with Philip Larkin’s Cut Grass, which got him his first job in publishing. His slides showed pictures of colleagues who have inspired him over the years, logos of imprints he has worked for and how they changed, as well as some of his recent projects, such as Mark Haddon’s A Spot of Bother.

After a short intermission, during which everyone had the opportunity to grab a drink, it was time for the next speaker: Cory Doctorow, a science fiction writer and journalist whose talk addressed e-books and piracy. Remembering the endless hours he spent producing mix tapes in order to impress girls as a teenager made him realise that people who try to get his novels online do this because they love his work not out of spite. His novel Down and Out of the Magic Kingdom was the first to be published under a creative commons license at the same time as it was available in stores.

Hannah Griffith opened her talk with a picture of the library next to which she grew up and took the audience on a journey through her life as a book-lover. Having learned everything there is to know about life from Mills and Boon, she started The Literary Consultancy and is now director of paperbacks at Faber and Faber. Her talk acknowledged both the literary aspect there is to publishing and the number-crunching aspect of brooding over BookScan figures and the like. Fortunately though, she said, she is lucky enough to work with authors who remind her that ‘it’s about writing, not selling’.

At this point the audience had the opportunity to get the inside scoop on what it’s like to be a cover designer from Jon Gray. After having apologised for the fact that thanks to the nature of his job, he doesn’t speak to people much, he gave a very generous insight indeed on the life cycle of some of the covers he has worked on. From initial pencil sketches to the final cover he explained how some made it and others were dismissed, and how things like changing the title of the book can make hours of work undone. He didn’t shy away from showing unsuccessful proposals and delivered a very entertaining presentation.

Helen Conford, editorial director at Penguin, talked about the reasons why she gets up in the morning and what she likes to think about. Her musings about the physical nature of books and on how they have the ability to reach all parts of life brought across that reading is about discovering something new – of whatever nature this might be. Hand drawn sketches of rabbits and, of course, penguins accompanied her talk.

Next to speak was Alison Baverstock, who runs the MA in Publishing at Kingston University and is the author of numerous books, including How to Market Books. She talked about her background in art history and how reading a painting can be very comforting. She chose to show pictures of things that inspire her (exhibitions such as Rothko, the sea, London buses and 1930s buildings for example) and why this is the case. Her advice to the audience was: ‘Have lots of children, they are a fantastic source for publishing’.

The last speaker was Joe Dunthorne, author of fiction and poetry, who told a very personal canon tale about growing up in Swansea, and shared his memories of playing computer games, Christmas as a child and his first band, Peanuts Are Bad (the name being inspired by his allergy to the same). He then talked about his move from lyrics to poetry and even recited a stanza of the first poem he ever wrote. With his first novel, Submarine, being based on his own life, he shortly realised that he would have to steal other people’s lives for his second book and is currently pursuing this. What he likes most about writing is that it takes him to places that he wouldn’t normally go. Due to the lack of a Welsh team, he also plays for the England Writers’ Football Team.

The variety of these talks and the various images the speakers chose to present show what a wonderfully manifold industry publishing is. Jon Slack and Doug Wallace concluded the evening by thanking everyone who had contributed to the smooth running of the evening and reading out a few of these now so fashionable tweets that had come in during the presentations. As always with SYP events there was plenty of opportunity to network and meet new people over a few drinks and everyone agreed that it was a thoroughly entertaining and stimulating evening. Bring on round 3!

Monika Muller

10 May 2009

InPrint: News

London Book Club: April

The White Tiger by Aravind Adiga

The White Tiger
April saw the SYP book club reading the 2008 Man Booker Prize winner, The White Tiger. A lot of people described the storyline as being 'familiar' - we thought it was quite similar to the box-office hit Slumdog Millionaire. Also, as some of us had been to the Pre-LBF seminar on Indian Publishing, issues like the horrendous traffic problems in India were fresh in our minds. This led to a discussion of the fact that India seems to be a very topical issue. Obviously, it is the market focus at this year's London Book Fair, but even within the UK film industry, the focus is currently on India.
As to whether or not we liked the book - some people liked it and others didn't. One regular book club member absolutely loved it! Those of us who were not so keen still thought it was a good 'book club book'; it generated a lot of discussion, even though some didn't necessarily like the storyline. I think there's a lot to be said about the fact that we talked about the book for almost an hour! In fact, the discussion made someone want to go back and read it again.
I commented that I didn't like the storyline being narrated as a letter. We actually weren't sure whether it was meant to be a letter or an email, but generally there were mixed views as to whether or not this type of narration was used effectively in the book. We also discussed how when the main character, Balram Halwai, left his hometown, his family treated him like an outcast. We felt that this paralleled with his master Ashok's position in his family, because he married Pinky Madam who was not only from America, but was also a Christian and not a Hindu.
A few people wanted to know whether or not we sympathised with Balram and whether he came across as a victim. I think as a group we definitely sympathised with Balram. One person admitted to have been egging Balram on to murder his master, although this was more due to annoyance that Balram hadn't been sticking up for himself. We also discussed the murder that took place at the end of the story. I personally felt that the first description of Balram murdering his master (right at the beginning of the book) was too casually brought into the narrative, and it felt like a complete character change. Up until then, Balram had been so nice and innocent! Someone commented that it was when Balram noticed that his girl's hair was dyed blonde (whereas his master Ashok's girl really did have blonde hair) Balram realised that he could never be his master and thus had to kill him.
There is an incident in the story where one of Balram's other masters makes Balram look for a one rupee coin that he has lost. After failing to find the coin, Balram gets out one of his own rupee coins and gives it to his master pretending that it is the lost coin. We felt that this act highlighted how much Balram was the 'bigger' man in comparison to the master, who appears to be overjoyed when the lost one rupee coin is found.
We briefly discussed the British Indian Community's negative reaction to the book when it was first published, especially how they didn't like Aravind Adiga's focus on the slums. This led to a discussion on the concept of wanting to 'hide' the negative parts of your own country. We all felt that this is a natural reaction as there are slums in England. In fact one person remarked that whilst they did like the book because of the 'escapism' factor, they might not have liked it if it had been a book containing descriptions of the slums of England. This reminded us of a similar outburst when Brick Lane was published.
We thought it was quite ironic that at the beginning of the story the school inspector tells Balram that he is a 'White Tiger': a rare finding amongst his classmates. This makes the reader think that he's going to be a model pupil and finish school. However, pretty soon after the inspector's visit, he ends up leaving school and becomes a tea-boy. In Slumdog Millionaire, although the main character in the film is a tea-boy, there's no accompanying explanation as to why he is a tea-boy. So we liked the fact that in The White Tiger there is a very long explanation as to why, and we find out that he comes from a long line of tea-boys and sweet-makers.
Naturally, as this book won the Man Booker Prize in 2008, there was a discussion around whether or not it was a worthy winner. We remembered how a similar discussion had arisen when we had been reading The Inheritance of Loss by Kiran Desai, which won The Man Booker Prize in 2006. A lot of us felt that because we knew it had won the Man Booker Prize, our expectations were high before we'd even begun to read the book. In conclusion, the general feeling was that everyone had enjoyed the book and found it entertaining, but didn't necessarily feel that it had the gravitas associated with Man Booker winners.
Serena Alam
18 April 2009

InPrint: News

Pre-London Book Fair Seminar on Indian Publishing

The SYP’s Pre-London Book Fair Seminar took place at the British Council, and was introduced by Group Exhibition Director of the LBF, Alistair Burtenshaw with an overview of the fair. Now in its 38th year, the London Book Fair is a ‘global publishing platform’ for all those working in the trade, and is, according to Burtenshaw, ‘primarily about trading foreign rights’, as well as domestic selling and networking.

 Last year, the fair saw 906 official exhibitors, and over 28,000 publishing professionals from 110 countries, which gives an idea of the ‘scope and scale of possibilities for doing business’ at the LBF. Alistair went on to speak about the fair’s market focus programme, the aim of which is to ‘strengthen cultural relations between the focus country and the rest of the world’. The idea came about six years ago, and enables publishers to take advantage of trading links, business possibilities end education opportunities, as well as exposing new writers from the focus country.

This year, the focus country is India (past focus countries have included Australia and New Zealand, Mexico and the Arab world). A partnership of organisations, including the Association of Publishers in India, the Indian Council of Cultural Relations, the Federation of Indian Publishers and of course the British Council, has facilitated five official pavilions and 86 Indian companies to attend the LBF.

But, as Alistair went on to discuss, ‘why India, why now? India is the second fastest growing large economy in the world, with great linguistic diversity (23 official languages), and the Indian diaspora in England also provides lots of opportunities. Moreover, India is the sixth largest book market in the world, and the third largest English language book market in the world.’ He encouraged SYP members to experience India at the LBF, through the professional seminars, cultural events, author sessions and networking opportunities provided. See the British Council website for full listings.

Next to speak was Kate Arthurs, from the literature department at the British Council. She spoke about the 45 writers who are coming over from India to attend the LBF this year, some well-known and some up-and-coming. ‘Many haven’t yet been published in English, but we hope they will be,’ Kate told us. The British Council have organised a series of 10 seminars at the LBF, covering the main issues in Indian publishing at the moment – subjects include fiction, identity, cinema, diaspora, translation, conflict, different genres, the battle for the Indian reader, the literature of ideas, bestsellers and popular writing. Kate concluded by urging the audience to visit the four literary cafes, which will all involve Indian authors.

Andrew Senior, Head of the Creative Economy Unit at the British Council then gave us a brief introduction to the UK Young Publisher of the Year (UKYPE) award. The international young publishers award has been running for six years, and the UK version is now in its third year. It resulted from ‘a demand from senior figures in the publishing industry to recognise talent and innovation’. Twelve finalists were whittled down to a shortlist of six, who took part in a study tour of the Indian publishing industry, about which they would speak to us tonight. These finalists, Andrew told us, are also part of a larger scheme of ‘new ways to create interaction, meeting with finalists in other creative areas, such as film, performing arts and design, thus ‘bringing together engines of the creative economy’.

Simon Littlewood, International Director at Random House, introduced the core of the evening – the UKYPE finalists. Unfortunately, James Bridle, founder of London-based Bookkake, was unable to join us, but the panel comprised of the five remaining finalists – Peter Collingridge, Founder of Apt Studio in London; Lucy Luck of Lucy Luck Associates; Davy Nougarede, Director of Heavy Entertainment in London; Nii Parkes, Senior Editor at Manchester-based Flipped Eye Publishing; and Jessica Purdue, Rights Executive at Orion Publishing Group.

Peter was first to speak about his experiences of both publishing and India. He is ‘not technically a publisher’, though his first job was as an unpaid intern at Canongate. His background is in literature, art and design, and he quickly realised that what interested him was creative marketing for books. When he discovered the internet, he knew this was what he wanted to do. Canongate was one of the first publishers to have a website, and so was an ideal place to start. After Canongate, Peter worked for a film company, and then set up Apt, a design and marketing consultancy with a specific focus on publishing and the arts.

Peter’s ‘enduring image of India was mobile phones’. Having travelled to India 15 years ago, his impression of publishing there was of a pirate industry. However he emphasised this ‘couldn’t be further from what we saw this time. The infrastructure is staggeringly advanced, and they are going through a golden age editorially. There’s not a lot of computers, especially in people’s homes, but everyone has mobile phones. 114 million mobile phones were sold in 2008, and they’re the perfect pocket device for reading on. There’s the potential here for reaching people in India who might not usually be accessing books – a healthy market and a hunger for reading.’

Next to speak was Lucy Luck, who started her career as a literary agent at Rogers, Coleridge and White when she was 23. Eight years later, though it was a ‘scary prospect to sit alone and say to authors “I know this is good, and I know where to sell it”’, she decided to start her own agency, primarily representing young authors. One of Lucy’s reasons for setting up her own company was to get involved in selling foreign rights; something she hadn’t been able to do until this point. Lucy pointed out what an interesting issue territorial rights is at the moment, especially ‘with countries like Australia wanting to be seen as an area in its own right, as well as places like South Africa and India’.

Being aware of the opportunities for distribution in India, Lucy wanted to find out more about the potential market there, so entered for the UKYPE award when she saw it advertised. ‘There are very few, if any, agents in India, but they are just at the beginning of the trajectory. There is a burgeoning of new Indian voices, and the multi-nationals have started their own concerns there and are competing against local publishers. India was mainly an educational market, but there is a new appetite for literary fiction.’

Lucy went on to speak about the ‘particular type of person’ who has traditionally made up the book-buying population in India. ‘They have to have a disposable income to spend on books. There is no internet trade, and the bookshops need work, but this is all changing.’ The Jaipur literary festival is a sign of this – ‘it is four years old, and full of editors from multi-nationals and local publishers talking about the issues in Indian publishing. There are opportunities – they are limited at the moment, but they are there.’

Davy Nougarede’s first job was on an international newsdesk in California, after which he worked with digital content at Thompson. He encountered real problems within the industry with producing quality digital content, so decided to set up his own business six years ago. ‘Audio books are seen as the runt of the publishing sector, but I carried on knocking on doors and pushing it. They’re not just for the visually impared – I really believed there was a market – look at Book at Bedtime on Radio 4 for example.’ His company started out producing 7–10 audio books a year for one publishing house, and now publish 220–250 audio books a year for 19 publishing houses.

Davy spoke of the ‘huge demand in India for publishing and digital content’. On the trip, he met many publishers and readers who expressed an interest in the audio format. ‘However, the difficulty is getting books out there. To Western distributors the system in India probably looks chaotic, but it does work. Book are sold door to door, at traffic lights, or you have to go to the counter and ask the bookseller. I don’t take the retail system in Britain for granted anymore!’

Several aspects of the Indian publishing industry came as a surprise to Davy – ‘unlike the British publishing industry, it is not predominantly female, they don’t seem to gather information or have databases, and they don’t like transparency!’ Also, Davy told us, he had assumed that lots of people would speak English, but only 20 million out of 1.6 billion people do, shrinking his potential market fairly quickly. He was also surprised that only a quarter of the population speak Hindi. ‘As a publisher, you have to deal with regional preferences and languages. The literacy rates are low too – a third of the male population is illiterate – but this could be a great opportunity for audio books. Even though people can’t read, they might still want access to literature – the country has a long history of story-telling.’

Davy aims to develop audio, make it available to the Indian market and to find ways to reach that potential audience. He agreed with Peter that ‘mobile phones create a massive market – they’re perceived like a laptop in India.’ Audio also has the advantage of low set-up costs – ‘how do you break even with a print-run of 300 copies for a local market? Audio works differently, so can be sold at a low price-point and matched to the appropriate market.’

Nii Parkes publishes poetry and literature. His aim is to ‘get literature out there cheaply’. He began his career teaching and writing, went on to become a development manager for a multi-national, and set up Flipped Eye eight years ago.

Nii went to India ‘looking at the market for opportunities. The market for literature in English in India hasn’t really developed. It is driven by population growth and transference – so if a father has a love of literature he might pass that on to his children, but this means that there is an inertia in the market; a coiled-spring effect. But this also means that there are opportunities to develop that market.’

Nii went on to discuss market appeal. ‘In Britain, books that are tie-ins to films are really popular, but this doesn’t really happen in Bollywood at the moment. But when it does, the market will grow. We need to use local appeal as well – so you could interview the author about their English-language book in a local language. Also, the education market will decrease as the population decreases. Non-academic, non-fiction is becoming more popular.’

Nii’s final point was about pricing. ‘In India, if the price-point is lower, the books sell better. The threshold point is really important. Attention needs to be paid to disposable income, and also to the distribution of English readers – they’re all over the country, not just in one place. We need to get the product to that market. It’s a market that will pay huge dividends for publishers willing to engage in a long-term plan.’

Our final speaker of the evening was Jessica Purdue. As someone who sells foreign rights, she was very interested in India as ‘the third biggest market for English language books after the US and the UK. Hindi is the dominant language – 28 per cent of books published in India are written in Hindi, but next is English, with 20 per cent.’

Jessica also spoke about the fact that the type of book varies from language to language. ‘For example, Hindi plays are popular, whereas a lot of locally-owned companies publish folk tales and religious titles, which is perhaps something to do with the oral tradition. English language books have traditionally been seen as something for the literary upper class, but this audience is widening and diversifying. Commercial fiction and self-help titles in English are becoming very popular. There is more translation between regional languages and from regional languages into English. Children’s books are popular, and you see lots of pirate editions of Harry Potter!’ The Indian market ‘needs to develop’, according to Jessica, in order for publishers there to buy translation rights from British publishers with any regularity, ‘but it does happen – Harper Collins are translating The White Tiger into Hindi.’

The speakers were followed with questions from the audience on a variety of topics, from the pirate industry in India, to how many people are actually reading books on their mobile phones. The evening provided valuable insight into Indian publishing and highlighted why it is such an interesting choice to be the market focus of this year’s London Book Fair.  The UKPYE winner will be announced in a ceremony at this year’s fair on Wednesday 22 April.

Lucy Mitchell

http://www.flickr.com/photos/thesyp/sets/72157616888667673/show/

07 April 2009

InPrint: News

Defining censorship

The ‘banned book’ spectacle that overshadowed the recent Emirates Airline International Festival of Literature in Dubai was a prescient reminder of the culture clash of East/West attitudes. The first ever festival of its kind to take place in the Middle East, the organisers described it as an event that would help ‘bridge the gap between East and West’. There can be no doubt that a festival of such a nature is a step toward achieving this aim. However, in the short term, the Atwood/Bedell incident has perhaps only served to highlight the inherent differences between the East and West. When it was revealed that Margaret Atwood had pulled out of the festival after discovering that a book had been banned due to its homosexual content, the public reaction was automatic outrage at this case of ‘book banning’. At the same time though, there was a sense that people were not that surprised that it had happened; almost that it was to be expected from such a culture. Advocators of free speech everywhere applauded Atwood for her stand against censorship and the festival suffered a heavy blow with more authors poised to boycott the event in order to make a united stand against this ‘censorship’. It was only when Atwood came forward to say that she may have misjudged the case that it became clear how quick so many people had been to use the term censorship. For a word that is capable of producing such a strong, knee-jerk reaction it is also one that is highly ambiguous in its definition.
It all started last September when Penguin submitted a book to be launched at the festival. The book in question was The Gulf Between Us by Geraldine Bell – a romance set in a fictional Gulf emirate. What Atwood initially believed had happened was that the book had been scheduled to appear at the event and that the organisers had then cancelled the launch in a fit of panic due to the predicted public reaction to one of the minor characters in the book being a gay sheikh. What further prompted Atwood to make the decision to pull out of the festival was her belief that, not only had the book been banned throughout the Gulf States, but that the author herself had been banned from Dubai. Had this been an accurate depiction of events then Atwood’s course of action seemed the obvious one to take, particularly as she is vice president of PEN - the anti-censorship organisation.
Atwood’s public boycott of the festival was a clear, strong statement. One that was so definitive that other authors, along with most of the literary establishment, quickly rallied round her but without investigating the actual events that led to the boycott. After speaking to the organiser of the festival, Isobel Abulhoul, it became clear to Atwood that no launch had ever been scheduled and, therefore, no launch had been cancelled. Moreover, neither the book nor the author were banned from the festival, or from Dubai for that matter. Following this information coming to light a rather brave backtrack took place as Atwood publicly attempted to clarify whether her actions were justified. It transpired that the book was just one of many that was not picked to appear at the festival. As Atwood put it, ‘This happens every day at every festival in the world. Publishers always want to launch or feature their authors and all festivals pick and choose’. What opened up this decision to accusations of censorship was something that can be put down to naivety and inexperience on Abulhoul’s part. In a well-intentioned letter she took the time to list all the reasons that the book had not been picked to appear. Amongst these reasons she pointed out that because the book was ‘set in the Gulf’, ‘talked about Islam’, then it ‘could be a minefield for us’. The author publicly concluded that this was censorship – ‘self censorship to avoid a political fallout’. While this is true to an extent it could also be said that it was a very sensible decision to make in the organising of the first-ever literary festival in the Middle East. As Sir Ranulph Fiennes put it: ‘I think that if anybody out there wants to establish a festival of some sort, they would be rather stupid to offend the locals in any way.’ What was most likely an even bigger factor than any of the above was the fact that Bedell was simply just not well known enough to be given a launch at such an event. While Abulhoul no doubt mentioned this in her lengthy list of reasons to Bedell, it is probably not too cynical to say that it was not exactly going to attract the same degree of media attention, and publicity for the book, as a cry of censorship from the author would.
In a frank and open column in the Guardian, Atwood came forward to admit that she might have been too hasty in her decision not to go to Dubai. She emphasised how this turn of events had highlighted the importance of not flinging around terms such as ‘ban’ and ‘censorship’. Atwood wrote, ‘Books are seriously “banned” and “censored” around the world, and people have been imprisoned, murdered and executed for what they’ve written. A loose use of these terms is not helpful.’
There are varying degrees of censorship. The word is most commonly associated with what is, in actual fact, one end of an extreme. That is the definition that refers to the governmental suppression of speech or text. At the opposite end of the spectrum there is the definition that refers to any action that restricts an idea (through the medium of text for the purposes of this discussion) from reaching its proposed audience. This can happen in a number of ways. For example, once a book has been published and presented in shops and libraries a complaint can cause the book to be withdrawn from its marketplace. It can also occur before it has a chance to even be judged by would-be censors – even prior to publication. This censorship is invisible and consists of people either editing a text prior to publication or abstaining from using certain books.
We must remember, however, that there is a difference between editing and censorship. The same goes for selection and censorship. Most editorial and selection decisions are based on creative judgements about a piece of work and an assessment of its quality. As Atwood puts it, ‘An independent festival has to exercise its own right and judgement – it’s not the same as banning.’ Market forces must come in to play and this is something that has perhaps always sat uncomfortably with literature.
So does the decision to not launch Bedell’s book at the festival amount to censorship? It depends on your definition of censorship. Yes, it did amount to censorship in the sense that the organisers were worried about the reaction a book with such content would get at this type of festival. If this had been the sole reason the book was not featured then the case for censorship might be stronger. However, the decision was probably more based on a judgement of the submitted manuscript and whether it had a place in first festival of this type in Dubai.

The end result is perhaps one of the most positive outcomes that could have emerged, given the circumstances. Atwood decided to appear at the festival via video link. In addition to this the issue of censorship was discussed directly at the festival during a hastily arranged debate on the topic organised by PEN. Strangely, Bedell’s book was not even mentioned during this debate but, more importantly, it did highlight the very real problems that are faced by some writers in the Middle East. As publishers it is important not to undermine the dangers of accepting restrictions imposed on the written word. With such a serious issue it is equally important to draw a distinction between what amounts to censorship and those actions that are better defined as editorial judgement.

Claire Robertson

           
17 March 2009

InPrint: News

February Speaker Meeting Report

The first speaker meeting of the SYP year jumped feet-first into the hot topic of the hour – the Credit Crunch. More specifically, the evening, organised by new SYP committee member and social secretary Nicki Crossley (Orion), focussed unsurprisingly on the impact that the dreaded C.C. is having on the book market and how the economic downturn may affect aspiring young publishers’ current jobs and futures. The event’s attendance illustrated how important the topic is to SYP members and non-members alike, as all ages and professions filled Foyles’ Gallery and latecomers either had to find makeshift seats on the floor or against the walls as all chairs were filled by kick-off at 6.45pm.

The evening began with some helpful (and sometimes mind-boggling) facts and figures from Reeta Wilson, Publishing Accounts Manager for Nielsen Bookscan. Providing a statistical grounding to the evening’s discussion, Reeta offered an insight into the sheer numbers that are technically the beginning and end of all publishing and book sales activity in the UK. She told the audience that in 2008 alone, 236 million book units were sold in the UK. Interestingly but somewhat unsurprisingly, she also pointed out that the top five thousand titles in the Bookscan charts accounted for 54% of the year’s sales, emphasising at the same time, as well as later in the evening, the importance of the ‘Long Tail’ both to support core bestsellers and to encourage more unlikely hits to emerge from a list. Reeta went on to say that 2008’s book sales were down by 5.5% on 2007’s, despite volume sales being up by 2.3%. This was down, she said, to heavy discounting which, especially around the festive period, saw the market ‘devalue its products by 500 million pounds’. As the audience audibly groaned to hear the stark reality of the already-much-debated discounting situation, more disappointing statistics were unfortunately to come.

After describing trade non-fiction by saying ‘what happens here drives the market’, Reeta went on to state that it was the ‘only area [or genre] that was in decline in 2008’. Although this statement could also be read positively – that all other genres were not experiencing downturn in 2008 – she also went on to explain that November 2008 was ‘down at the most crucial time – down 17% on last year’. Commenting briefly on the fact that ‘[book] cover price is going up but discounting is bring the price down’ to a few select giggles from the crowd, Reeta ploughed on to 2009. Despite the worrying figures that show that so far in 2009 book sales are down 1.6% by value and down 8% by volume on 2008, Reeta ended her presentation on a positive note, urging the industry professionals in the audience that ‘you can do something about it’. Asking questions such as ‘Are you capitalising on media coverage?’ she stressed the importance of ‘making the most of what’s coming’, ‘setting realistic targets’ and perhaps most important of all: ‘if you don’t keep your eye on the ball you’re going to lose out’.

Next to speak was Mark Rusher, Trade Marketing Director at Orion Publishing Group. Fluent and seemingly at ease speaking to such a large audience, Mark focussed on how harnessing the potential power of marketing in difficult times is of great importance and how the role of (especially ‘young’) publishers responsible for marketing in any organisation is to emphasise this importance to their employers. Also, he stressed, it is their prerogative to find clever, cost-effective ways to best use marketing spend and resources at a time when the ‘powers that be’ may be tempted to scale back on costs and even staff in an area/department of which it is ‘hard to quantify the value’ – there are often no tangible direct results from marketing activity. Mark talked about how today’s consumers are ‘price sensitive, prepared to shop around and respond to direct marketing’ and that marketing personnel ‘need to be clever’ to tap into the whims of the consumer and drive initiatives such as ‘encouraging shops to do lots of local events’. He also, interestingly, discussed the opportunities that the C.C. may be actually opening up for book marketing, for example on TV: ‘terrestrial advertising has now become a financial possibility’. He also made the audience laugh by ending his slot by saying ‘I was a teenager in the early ‘70s when England was really f**ked’, speaking from experience to reassure the young publishers in the audience that ‘it’s not necessarily going to be so bad’.

The last speaker of the night was Eunice Paterson, Project Manager at Sage Publications, an educational publisher. Paterson took a slightly different tack and focussed on the moral and ethical responsibility a publisher has to their suppliers and service providers. In a convincing argument, she explained how she would not necessarily automatically go for the cheapest price when choosing services such as printers, as she felt a responsibility not to demand the price to be driven so low that those printers then ran the risk of going out of business, even if their production costs were also unavoidably rising. Stressing that ‘best practice is always best practice in good times and bad times’, she went on to expand on this, saying that ‘we’ve got to keep trusting each other and building relationships’ so that businesses at all ends of the publishing spectrum know and support each other to keep the industry alive and operational from a basic level. Concentrating mainly on the importance of structuring strong foundations and inter-business relationships, she explained that a best practice code now may be tomorrow’s insurance against potential disaster: ‘if you’ve built up relationships, those people aren’t going to let you go down the pan’.

The evening provided lively discussion, with three different enough perspectives on the panel to provide the audience with a great deal of food-for-thought. With at least fifteen minutes of very animated Q and A afterwards, the topic clearly got the speakers and audience involved with the subject, and the variety of opinion and viewpoints provoked some impassioned debate.

Rebecca Fenton

06 March 2009

InPrint: News

Review of the 2009 AGM

The 2009 AGM was a spectacular way to open the SYP's 60th year.  Committee member Rachel Menzies came up with the original idea of a Publishers Q&A, and the 2008 Chair, Jon Slack, was as instrumental as ever in establishing a stellar cast: Will Atkinson (Chair of the Independent Publishers Guild and Sales Director, Faber & Faber), Bob Campbell, (Senior Publisher, Wiley-Blackwell), Mike Clarke (Head of Libraries, Camden), Helen Fraser, (Managing Director Penguin and Chair of the Environmental Action Group), Simon Juden (CEO of the Publishers Association), and Graham Rand (President of the Booksellers Association).  The panel was chaired by the very witty Sandy Balfour, who is an author, as well as writing for the Guardian.
Publishers Question Time panel
  A wide variety of questions came from floor, concerning topics such as the Net Book Agreement, electronic copyright theft, diversity in publishing, and the fate of independent bookshops.  As an ex-Amazonian, I was particularly interested in the following question: "How can chain and independent booksellers work together to prevent Amazon from completely dominating the book retail industry?"  Simon Juden's practical response was to say that they couldn't, since that would be illegal, and Sandy Balfour commented that while he ideally wanted to support independent bookshops, when it came to the buying of books, Amazon's fast and competitive service tended to win the argument for him.  It's a pity that there was no opportunity to put points forward from the floor, but we only had one roaming mike, limited time, and besides, our expert panel covered every issue in great depth.

  Then came a part of the night that I was perhaps not so eagerly anticipating, for, in a first for the AGM, there were three candidates for the position of 2009 Chair, myself included.  I was first up to speak, and I thought my speech went well, despite my legs shaking slightly - people laughed in the right places, although there were a few good-natured boos when I mentioned that I had previously worked for Amazon.  However, I was then blown away by the depth and quality of the speeches from my competitors, Angie Solomon and Julia Wells.  So, I wasn't totally surprised when Angie was elected as the 2009 Chair, and Julia as the Vice Chair.  I think it was the correct decision on the night, and I'm sure that they'll be a very strong team.Angie Solomon Simon Juden

  The AGM was also the opportunity to meet the new committee members, who were all voted into their new offices.  It was also the chance for me to speak to Nicholas Jones and Giles Clark, as I had been previously worried that they had regarded me as very rude when I arrived late for their seminar at the 2008 Conference, especially as I had seemed to be texting throughout, when I was actually jotting notes down into my PDA!  Suzanne Collier, Business Director of bookcareers.com and a sponsor of the AGM, then stood up to give a speech to celebrate the 21st anniversary of the first time that she became Chair of the SYP (and her record of having been Chair most often will never be bettered).  Angie got down to business straight away, as she met the new committee members. Later on in the evening, I overhead one former Chair congratulating Jon Slack on the success of the night: in her opinion, the AGM had been bigger than some previous conferences!  A splendid time was had by all, and it's gratifying to relate that the SYP is in some very safe hands.

01 February 2009

InPrint: News

Google: This site may harm you

At the recent SYP AGM, I was amused to hear Amazon described as a 'monopoly'.  As a former employee of Amazon, I have mixed feelings about the company, as I had both good times and bad times there.  Generally, I think I prospered there, and they are currently selling my debut novel, A Fame of Two Halves, at a very good price.   But my view is tempered by the fact that I believe that there is an even more dangerous monopoly out there.  Amazon, after all, is just a retailer, in a marketplace that is still very competitve.  Google, on the other hand, as the leading search engine, arguably controls access to the world's knowledge, which is far more valuable.

  My fear of their power was the reason why I was so angry this afternoon when I tried to access the SYP site via Google.  I was alarmed to see a very prominent warning message which informed me that the SYP site could harm my computer.  My panic subsided after a few moments when I discovered that the BBC website had the same error message attached to it.  Oh, and, in a very humorous aside, I must report that Google's own website had the same error message attached to it, which will make the company look even more foolish.  A report on CNET suggests that "this problem was caused by an outage at StopBadware.org. If so, Google needs to rethink its failsafe strategy for this data source".  I'm glad to announce that things have gone back to normal, and that Google no longer regards the SYP as being a menace to anyone's computer.

  When Google first came along, I loved them, as they gave high rankings to my literary website Authortrek, and awarded sites that had the best content, and were generally far less snooty about what they listed than AltaVista.  However, a decade down the line, I now dislike Google immensely, for simultaneously downgrading the search rankings for all of Authortrek's subsidiary pages overnight with no explanation.  They're also incredibly difficult to contact.  I succeeded on contacting them and complaining about this on a previous occasion, and the ranking of my subsidiary pages were restored for 6 months.  However, I am tired of having to go through this process, tired of Google effectively denying passing visitors to my site, tired of feeling powerless at Google's expense, so tired that I am now letting the site run down, especially since I never got enough revenue through my Google ads.  These Google ads are also not what they're cracked up to be - if I search for the amateur author 'Peter Reiling' on my site, I don't expect to see adverts for 'Garden Railings', but this is what Google delivers to me.  I got so fed up with Google a few years ago that I wrote a poem about them, which neatly expresses my feelings about the company:

To Canoodle Google

I loved you to bits
When you first started
Giving me a hit.

With every beholden click,
I gave you a golden tick.

I didn’t know who you were at first
But you came through
When the bubble burst.
And soon everyone on Earth
Knew who you were.

You rode through the surf
And you gave birth
To many pages of worth.

But now everything seems to be worse.
Going public seems to have been a curse.
It was you who said, honey,
That you could make money
Without being evil.
Do you even care
About Tiananmen Square?

I gave up everything for you,
And now you treat me like poo.
I never thought I’d see the day
When you’d make me pay
To be the number one on your list.

You make me regret
That we had ever kissed.

You used to be my best mate,
We even went on several dates.
But now my love is late,
And has turned into hate.

You look at me with baby eyes,
But now I see they’re full of lies.
You bend down for a kiss
But I no longer wish
To canoodle Google.

Kevin Mahoney is the SYP Web Content Editor, and the author of the novel, A Fame of Two Halves, which fortunately does not contain any of his poetry.

31 January 2009

InPrint: News

SYP Committee Member publishes debut novel

SYP Web Content Editor Kevin Mahoney has just had his debut novel published, which Joanne Harris, of Chocolat fame, has described as "a tremendous first novel - wry, funny and clever. I hope it's the first of many".  You can read the synopsis and an extract from A Fame of Two Halves below.

A Fame of Two HalvesBuy the paperback edition of A Fame of Two Halves from Amazon.co.uk (only £6.99 if you choose the Super Saver Delivery option).  Or, you can buy the e-book edition for only £2.99 from Kevin's literary website, Authortrek.com

A Fame of Two Halves synopsis

For Elliot Gold, manager of the Duxford Ducks football team, life seems to be going from bad to worse.  His job and his marriage both face imminent demise.  He pins all his hopes on winning one last match.
  But Elliot Gold is not a lucky man…
  Drowning his sorrows with his parents in Malta, Elliot is suddenly offered a chance to resurrect his football career with a team he renames ‘The Maltese Falcons’.  With the inspirational music of Spandau Ballet racing through his veins, Elliot attempts to reinvent himself.  Will he woo the lovely Silvia?  Can he save his parents’ marriage as their union also heads for the rocks?  Will he ever win again?

An Extract from A Fame of Two Halves

Elliot Gold stared at Doctor Tell's ceiling.  He was used to the sight.  He saw the Gucci doctor once a week, and told him all his woes.  Elliot had tried to persuade the team to join him in a group session, but neither they nor Doctor Tell had agreed to it.  Doctor Tell had a reason why, but just wouldn't tell.  That was probably where it all began to go wrong, Elliot thought.  Prior to that had been his revelatiAuthor Kevin Mahoneyon to a journalist from The Sun that he had learnt all his training skills from Duxford State Circus when he was a lad.  Until that moment, Elliot’s timing, his ability to read the game and life itself had been perfect.    Elliot had held the complete respect of the team.  No one had ever questioned him before that.  Not long after, with his confidence in his own abilities low, Elliot had sunk to introducing the long ball into Duxford’s game.
  If truth should be told, as it should be in Doctor Tell's office, Elliot had only devised the tactic because he had heard that all first team players at Wimbledon regularly saw a psychoanalyst (and what better club to emulate than one which had come from nowhere?).  So, Elliot had decided that Duxford United could do with some of the same mind quackery.  He would have tried anything to have healed their confidence, and what better way than to confide their woes to a pro? 
  It never had occurred to him that the real reason why Wimbledon players went to see the men in white coats was that they were all nutters. 
  Doctor Tell's ceiling was fascinating.  To the casual observer, the black and white blobs on each tile merged into a meaningless jumble, but to Elliot, they signified something far different.  One of them had a semicircle of black with a curved swirl of ebony in the middle.  It was obvious to anybody but a referee, Elliot reasoned, that this was Graeme Souness.  To his left was a lanky and quite unpronounceable piece of soot - Kenny Dalglish.  Another had a wispy effect - definitely the late Bob Paisley.  And the one with the bold black strokes?  Shankly.  Frankly, it had to be Shankly.
  He should never have listened to that man.  What was his name now?  That man he had met in the Duck and Cower?  Mister Chadwick - that was it.  One might well have taken advice from Mister Spud.  And fancy ever trying to emulate Wimbledon, Liverpool's bogey team.  No wonder Liverpool's majestic crowned heads stared balefully down at him from the ceiling.
  "How are we today?" the impeccably dressed Doctor Tell asked.
  "Oh, fine," Elliot lied. 
  There was something about this room that reminded Elliot of the confessional: it was the bars on the window.  Whenever a priest asked if he had sinned, Elliot had seen fit to invent a whole litany of crimes, falling just short of mass murder and littering.  He hadn't wanted to disappoint the priest, since he could never remember them anyway, they were so numerous.  But you just had to say something in that situation.  Okay, so lying, and thus committing another sin, was not an ideal solution, but saying you hadn't sinned at all was positively sinful in Elliot's eyes, even if you hadn't.  Still, he had only been a practising Catholic till the age of ten, and then he'd only gone to confession with his class.  That was when you proved how hard you were by how long you took to do your penance.
  "How's your schizophrenia coming along?" Elliot asked.
  "Very droll," the Doctor commented, although it was at least the thousandth occasion with which he had encountered the remark. "You know, Mr Elliot, the one danger of psychoanalysis is that the patient and the therapist will swap places.  In your case, however, I believe we are quite safe."
  "Well, I certainly keep you in business, Doc.  I'm your best customer."
  This was a slight fib on Elliot's part.  He was, in fact, Doctor Tell's worst client.  Doctor Tell resisted imparting this news to his client in case it made him depressed.  He didn't want Elliot to get any worse.
  It was hardly fair, Elliot reasoned to himself (thus making Doctor Tell redundant).    Thank God he hadn't heeded Chadwick's other advice though: to hire a ballet dancer.  Elliot couldn't see a weak little lass running through their SAS fitness regime, let alone lead it.  But then again, Elliot had come to maturity in the late seventies, when no one had heard of a feminist movement, apart from the defenders at Arsenal.
  "I believe we were talking about your recurring dream last time..." the Doctor began when he got tired of watching Elliot's eyes dart about the ceiling.  Doctor Tell's mother had always told him to be suspicious of men whose eyebrows met, and it was in this way that Elliot became prime suspect on the many occasions when Duxford’s homicide squad had been forced to consult the good doctor.
  Elliot leaned back in the couch.
  "Well, now,” Elliot said, even although he wasn't.  Otherwise he could have gone home. "I'm in a garden."
  "What kind of garden?"
  "I dunno.  It's not a very green garden."
  "And why is that?"
  "It's summer.  It's too hot to be green.  There's hardly a blade of grass.  The earth is so scorched."
  "Is this an English Summer?" Doctor Tell asked incredulously (having been brought up at a time when there was no talk of global warming).
  "No, it's abroad."
  "What country?"
  "I don't know," Elliot lied.  He could never actually remember his dreams, but he did have some quite vivid memories.  One that especially shone in his mind was that of a childhood holiday in Malta.  It was the first time that he had ever been abroad.  Ah, he could remember it as if it was the day before yesterday, perhaps even last week.  The sun had seemed so bright there, and the people so pleasant.  It was a million miles away from England on a wet May morning. 
  Elliot liked to think of his childhood.  He had been a happy child.  Life had been so uncomplicated then.  There were times when he wished he could return to that state, to have no worries in the world...  To see the world beneath from a small womblike shell in the sky, just as that bloke did in 2001: A Space Odyssey… Perhaps that would be what old age would be like, having brunch in a Georgian palace with good acoustics. 
  "It was somewhere in the Mediterranean," Elliot continued.  He liked the name - Middle Earth.  To him, it seemed solid, firm, and Tolkien.
  "What are you doing?"
  "I am sitting on the ground.  It is warm, reassuring.  There is a little brick wall running along the path.  At the bottom, in a crack, is an ants nest."
  "What are these ants doing?"
  "They are scurrying along the ground.  They are carrying tiny leaves.  I put my finger in their way.  The ants just walk around.  I squash some."
  "You kill the ants?"
  "Yes.  There are very many of them.  They are like the ones in our self catering apartment."
  "Is the apartment infested?"
  "No, they just marched up and down one bit of wall.  They are living in their own world, totally unaffected by my presence.  It was a beautiful sight - a moving wall."
  "Where are you now?"  Doctor Tell prompted after a slight pause.
  "I am in the garden again.  I squash some ants."
  "What kind of ants are these?"
  "They are worker ants.  As soon as I kill some, bigger ants arrive on the scene."
  "What are these new ants like?"
  "They have pincers on their head.  They attack my finger by pinching it.  Little ants hang off my fingers with their pincers."
  "Does their bite hurt?"
  "No, the pincers are too small."
  "What do you do now?" Doctor Tell enquired.
  "I retaliate."
  "You kill more of the ants?"
  "Yes."
  "Please continue."
  "Soon there are very many bodies on the ground."
  "How do you feel?"
  "I am enjoying it.  Pretending to be a great warrior."
  Doctor Tell clicked his fingers.  It was his method of signifying some kind of closure.  It stemmed from his days as a stage hypnotist, from the time when he had very nearly been disbarred from the Mind Benders Association.
  Elliot sat up and teetered on the edge of the couch.  He found it very comforting to swing his legs in his posture, but Doctor Tell wasn't about to give him a big push.  He left his real swinging for the weekend.
  "So, what was that all about?" Elliot asked brightly.
  "You tell me."
  "No, you Tell, me Elliot."
  "Your humour will be the death of me, Mr Gold," said Doctor Tell as sternly as he could. "Well?"
  "I haven't the foggiest," Elliot said uneasily.  He hated psychoanalysing himself; it made a mockery of paying Doctor Tell.
  "Is it not possible that you feel yourself surrounded by enemies, and that you wish to strike back in some way?"
  "What enemies?  I don't have any enemies," Elliot said worriedly.  But hadn't he seen someone walk past his house with a bazooka the other day?
  "Perhaps ‘enemies’ is the wrong word.  Your critics, shall we say?  Is it not true to say that your have more than your fair share of critics in the professional and amateur press?"
  "Amateur press?" asked a mystified Elliot.
  Doctor Tell waved a copy of The Sucks in the air.
  "Ah, the fanzine," Elliot said as the light slowly dawned. "What does it say?"
  "You mean you haven't read it?"
  "I write the weekly programmes.  What do I need to read that for?  I mean, I pick the teams and all that, so presumably I know what I am doing."
  "Well, according to this rag, you don't."
  "What!" cried an outraged Elliot. "Let me see that!"
  "Are you sure?  Some of it is quite virulent," Doctor Tell warned as the fanzine was snatched from his grasp.
  "’Elliot Gold, you should be sold!  Always believing you’re indestructible. Well I’ve got news for you, mate’" Elliot read. "They can't sell me, I'm the manager!  And why are all the pages stuck together?"
  "Amateur press," Doctor Tell reiterated as he prised the fanzine from Elliot's grasp.  It was his professional opinion that Elliot shouldn't see all those old photos of his wife.  Especially not the nude ones.
  "I don't care what they have to say!  I'll show them!" Elliot said furiously as he stormed out of the room in a way he’d last done when he was twelve.  He’d been seeing Doctor Tell for a very long time.
  Doctor Tell leant back and formed his hands into a steeple.  He was highly skilled at metamorphosis.
  "An excellent analysis," he muttered evilly to himself, which only bearded Machiavellian men in good suits can really pull off.

A Fame of Two Halves is a Print on Demand book, generated by Lightning Source.  Click here to read Kevin's recent article about the SYP Study Tour to Lightning Source.  The paperback edition of A Fame of Two Halves was published by YouWriteOn.com, in association with Legend Press.  Click here to read an article about the founding of Legend Press that Tom Chalmers wrote for the SYP.  SYP members can also read Kevin's account of how the book was published in the next edition of InPrint.

To contact Kevin, please email him at editor@authortrek.com rather than the form below.  Click here to go to the SYP homepage.

10 December 2008

InPrint: News

SYP Conference: Publishing Career Development

A slight technical hitch meant that I was late for the Publishing Career Development workshop.  Unfortunately, the doorway to Malet Place, where the workshop was held, could only be opened by a key card, or by somebody standing inside it.  The marshal inside the doorway just before this workshop happened to be me, and regrettably, the person who was supposed to be covering me arrived late.  Still, such minor crises will always happen at any conference.  I just hope the speakers did not think I was too rude – I was not texting throughout the workshop, but writing my notes into my mobile phone pda (from which I’d just been reading an e-book edition of A Portrait of an Artist as a Young Man – all very Web 2.0!)

Nicholas Jones, Managing Director of Strathmore Publishing, began the session, saying that all people working in publishingNicholas Jones have to be a marketer to enthuse their sales directors.  He then went on to say that it’s useful to know what kind of roles that you prefer to play on a team, mentioning Dr. Meredith Belbin’s Team Role Theory.  Nicholas related that Nielsen has transformed the bestseller list, as it's now so accurate, and that the value of books sold is going up and up.  However, one of the most important aspects of career development is keeping an eye on what’s currently happening.  For instance, many of our customers now derive from the new iPod generation, and are accustomed to devices that do many things.  Nicholas stated that there are about 40,000 titles that make up iTunes sales (which is much the same number as you can find in a traditional high street bookshop). So, all the money's still in the head, not the long tail.   According to The Register, Chris Anderson’s Long Tail theory, which suggests that businesses will sell less of blockbusters in the future and more of less well-known items, is seriously flawed.  However, to counter this, Mark Thwaite, Managing Editor of The Book Depository, stated in the conference’s opening session that his company are finding the long tail to be very profitable indeed.  Nicholas continued on his theme by stating that just as bands are now making money from touring and playing gigs, so authors are making more money from the literary festivals circuit.  He then went onto discuss the concept of Disintermediation – i.e. “cutting out the middle man”, which could have disturbing implications for publishers, as we are the middle men that could seemingly be dispensed with in this new Web 2.0 world.  However, publishers add value, and are very good at communicating with their audience.  New technologies such as Print on Demand mean that there are now more than 100,000 titles published a year, whereas it used to be more like 30,000.  There is also the example of audiobooks, which have been transformed by digital downloads (so much more convenient than messing around with 20 audio cassettes while trying to listen to an unabridged book).  Giles Clark, author of Inside Book Publishing, then stated that only half a dozen European publishers control the mass market. Giles Clark and Nicholas JonesNow, the tendency is to licence content, which is a move from a product-based model to a service one.  And unlike other careers you could choose, you can get more responsibility in publishing early on, although usually with much lower pay.
  Suzanne Collier, Business Manager of Bookcareers.com, has given careers advice for the last 20 years, and so she also proved to be an ideal speaker on the issue of career development.  Suzanne stated that publishing's main aim is to make money. Publishing is now in the most exciting phase ever with digital, and asked the delegates to question themselves - how will they cope?   One of the most important things you can do is to improve your publishing skills.  If you want to work in editorial, make friends with the editorial department. She also advised delegates to keep an eye on current affairs, so that they would have ideas for future books. You mustn’t be shy in pushing yourself forward at work, to volunteer.  It’s also always worthwhile seeing if you can come to an arrangement with your employer for them to pay for your training.  You must also invest in yourself, to improve your computer skills, speed-reading, and business sense.  If you want a promotion, it’s always a good idea to read your company's business plan, to see where they are expanding.  At the end of the day, when you’re seeking to advance, what you are doing is marketing, and the product is you.  If you're not getting any interviews, then it’s probably down to your CV, so make sure that you have someone else check it over for you. Most of all, though, publishers want enthusiastic employees.
  So, although I missed the beginning of this workshop, I did get a great deal out of it.  One of the delegates I spoke to told me that some of the other workshops did not tie in very well with the theme of the conference (Publishing 2.0: The Reader Revolution), however I am glad to report that the Publishing Career Development workshop most definitely did.

SYP members can buy Giles Clark's Inside Book Publishing for a discount - click here for more details.

Kevin Mahoney

03 December 2008

InPrint: News

It's Still Day One

10 years of Amazon.co.ukAmazon's labour relationsAmazon's relationship with publishers

Ten years ago, I was working in Ottakars in Slough.  I had just finished my Masters degree, but was still uncertain as to what to do next as a career.  However, I was certain that I did not want to work in bookshop management.  And then something miraculous happened: Amazon.co.uk opened up in my hometown.
The Amazon logo    It seemed like an ideal fit for me, as I was very much into the Internet, and had recently created my own website.  Amazon also started out selling solely books, so my bookshop experience would no doubt come in very handy.  I came through the rigorous interview process and was offered a job.  Being quite a loyal person, I decided to stay on at Ottakars over the Christmas period, and joined Amazon immediately after (so I only participated in 6 of the legendary Amazon Christmases).  When I arrived, they weren’t quite sure what to do with me, as they’d forgotten that I was due to start work that day!  My heart sank as I was asked to come back the next day at 5am to work in the Receive department. Fortunately, I was just as quickly bumped up into the Special Receive department, as I was told by one manager that I was probably the only one of the new recruits “who’d seen a book before” (this manager is now working as the CEO and founder of The Book Depository).
    My family were rather sceptical about my new job, especially it involved that new-fangled Internet thingy.  They were also quite doubtful that I would make any money from one of the perks of the job, the Amazon stock options.  Most of all, they, like many people at the time, were dubious that enough people would trust an online store with their credit cards (the same people now are probably saying that they will never read an e-book, but the success of Amazon shows that such attitudes do change over time).
    So, I was there at Amazon in the days when managers were fazed about the task ahead of them, unsure of how they were ever going to fill up that warehouse in Bestobell Road, Slough.  Then again, Amazon was quick to adopt new markets, such as DVDs, and was able to successfully jump on the Harry Potter bandwagon with the release of The Prisoner of Azkaban.  Being at Amazon had its ups and downs, but I very much subscribed to the dream of “work hard, have fun, and make Marston Gate 1history”, especially as my first degree was partly in History.  I remember popping out at work to witness a solar eclipse, but what was happening in the warehouse could equally be seen as being amazing, as Amazon became one of the fastest growing businesses ever, and in a whole new sphere to boot.
    Although, I did have one big frustration in those early days, in that Amazon wouldn’t say boo to a ghost.  Publishers regarded Amazon warily, not sure what to make of this new initiative, and were slow to make deals.  Which meant that we were very reliant on wholesalers such as Gardners.  One of Amazon’s most significant maxims was the importance of the customer: they had to come first.  Unfortunately, this could sometimes conflict with the terms and conditions of our suppliers.  I remember the Special Receive team being called into a meeting with a Gardners rep, who was visibly very angry with us, as we kept returning special receive books as damaged.  He waved around one particular book at us, which had a boot print on the inside cover, and accused us of having kicked it around the warehouse.  We weren’t allowed to protest in this extraordinary meeting, but I felt particularly aggrieved as I had been the one to take the book out of its Gardners’ tote, footprint and all, and had damaged it out as I was pretty sure that there was another copy of this fairly new book out there sans-footprint.  Nevertheless, the Gardners rep had a point: we were sending back too many special receive books, but the manner in which he made his point was wrong.  Yet he could afford to be aggressive with us, because Amazon as a whole was dependent on Gardners at the time.
    Amazon did actually fill the Bestobell Road warehouse fairly quickly, so in the Summer of 1999, all associates were called into an “All hands” meeting to be informed that the company was opening a new distribution centre in Milton Keynes.  We were invited to come along, and no doubt many like me were persuaded by the generous relocation package.  I continued to Marston Gate 2prosper in my Amazon career: having been promoted to tier two while in Slough, I became a recipient of the Amazonian Award in May 2000 (a trophy in the form of one of Amazon’s infamous “doordesks”), and eventually became a Customer Service Liaison.  And although Amazon still wasn’t making any money, it looked as though it had survived the bursting of the Internet bubble.
    On September 11th 2001, all associates were called into another All Hands meeting, to be told that two planes had been flown into the Twin Towers of the World Trade Center.  Since Amazon was an American company, we were told to be more vigilant, and although one of the plane hijackers had been trained at nearby Cranfield, the distribution centre was fortunately only subject to hoax bomb threats over the next few years.

Click here to read more about Amazon's labour relations during this time

01 December 2008

InPrint: News

SYP Conference: Editorial

Giving an inside perspective on editorial at this year’s conference, Gurdeep Mattu from Continuum Books and Sara O’Keefe from Orion shared their thoughts on what it means to be a Commissioning Editor.

First to speak was Gurdeep, Commissioning Editor for the Language and Linguistics list at academic publisher, Continuum. Gurdeep’s editorial career so far has taken him from Editorial Assistant at Robert Hale Ltd to Assistant Editor at SAGE before his commissioning role at Continuum. Gurdeep gave those starting out on the editorial ladder advice on the skills you need to develop in a commissioning role and exactly what the job entails. He explained that proposals are “the meat of commissioning” and how publishing is about business just as much as pleasure and personal taste. It is fundamentally based around about profit and loss sheets, and finding those books that can make a profit as well as making a difference. He noted the importance of the 60% profit margin, understanding the market and spotting gaps in it, and delivery of a coherent plan of action amidst differing opinions.
Gurdeep also pointed out that academic publishing doesn’t require an in-depth knowledge or masters degree in a particular subject. Skills and passion for the product are more important. He compared academic books to literary fiction in the sense that they hold up a mirror to humanity and are essential to a better understanding of the world around us, and therefore incredibly worthwhile to work on. Gurdeep concluded that “enthusiasm is the key” and pointed out that, as commissioning editor, if you don’t enthuse about a book, nobody else will.

Sara O’Keefe then spoke from a commercial publisher’s perspective about her work at Orion, part of Hachette-Livre UK. Sara’s path to Commissioning Editor spanned 6 years, moving from Editorial Assistant at BCA to Assistant Editor at Orion and then Editor, and ultimately, Commissioning Editor. She pointed out that, while fiction can be divided into the categories of literary fiction and commercial fiction, there’s a great deal of crossover between both departments in terms of content and approach. “Commercial fiction is not code for badly written or down-market fiction” she explained and cited the main difference to be that commercial fiction is usually narrative driven.

When working on commercial fiction, Sara explained, the question to ask first and foremost is, “Does it make me want to turn the page?” Although working as an editorial assistant can mean a role dominated by administration, Sara gave some top tips for making the most of this time, including: keep an eye on the bestseller list in order to track publishing trends and anticipate new ones; be aware of the packaging of different books and how they are marketed; analyse the market, and of course, “read, read and read some more”. She concluded by explaining the importance in commissioning of building a vision for the book in your mind, maintaining that vision when others may try to sway you and ultimately getting others to support your vision too.

Gurdeep and Sara then went on to answer questions from the audience, giving practical advice on getting ahead in editorial before we all headed to the canteen for a well-deserved lunch.
29 November 2008

InPrint: News

SYP Conference: Marketing and Publicity

In the Publicity and Marketing workshop at this year’s conference, Claire Morrison, Senior Marketing Executive for CCV at Random House, and Truda Spruyt, Associate Director at Colman Getty, shared their expertise.
     Claire began the workshop by defining marketing as “informing the target market that a particular book is available, and influencing them to purchase it”. This involves looking at the 4 Ps: Product, Price, Place and Promotion. Claire explained that marketing is broadly split into two phases: The sell-in and the sell-out. The sell-in refers to marketing the books to the retailer and the sell-out refers to marketing the books to the consumer. Claire looked at the various ways books are promoted from general press, magazine and TV advertising to competitions and point of sale marketing. Focusing on the theme of the conference, she also explored the increasing use of online marketing to help sell books. The advantage of online marketing is that it can target specific audiences easily. It can include advertorials, sponsorship, and even use of video and sound, which makes the internet an exciting marketing tool. Claire told us some very revealing online facts such as that 78% of people have bought books due to reading recommendations off websites and that people spend, on average, 13-17 minutes on social networking sites, 4 times longer than any other site. If they can be used effectively, social networks like Myspace and Facebook are useful ways of marketing books.
     Claire also looked specifically at her own campaign for Jo Nesbo’s “Nemesis”. She told us how mobile technology was experimented with, advertising a “get the first chapter free to your mobile phone” deal on posters at railway stations. Another innovative use of online marketing by Random House was inspired by their business book “Crowdsourcing”, about the power of the crowd. The marketing department used the central concept of the book, the power of the crowd, to help promote it, asking the “crowd” to design the cover via a website. At first, interest in the site was slow but, once bloggers started writing about it, interest significantly increased and, by the end, there were over 300 entries and people voted online for the winner. As online marketing is a relatively new phenomenon, Claire explained it can be rather hit and miss. But the rewards for experimentation can be great and it is going to be a valuable way of promoting books in the future.
      To conclude, Claire gave an overview of why marketing can be a great career choice in publishing. Marketing is all about creativity, variety, communication (both internally and externally) and, crucially, looking at the bigger picture.
     Truda Spruyt then spoke about her perspective on publicity. Truda has over 15 years experience in publicising arts, literary and cultural projects. Her company works on many publishing related campaigns including the promotion of JK Rowling, Nigella Lawson and Cherie Blair, as well as events like World Book Day.
     Truda explained that, although the general perceived difference between marketing and publicity is that publicity is promoting for free, there is more to it than that. Publicity is essentially about maximum exposure; getting the message across to as many people as possible. Timing, Truda explained, is crucial. Telling your media contacts the right thing at the right time is hugely important. Planning ahead is also essential as some magazines need to be approached as much as 6 months in advance. Of course, online promotion is useful in the respect that it can appear almost immediately on the internet. The web can also be valuable with authors who don’t come across very well on television or radio. Online author Q and A sessions, for example, can give a better public image of an author.  
     Truda stressed that, although publicity has changed with advances in technology, the personal touch is still important: “It is so easy to delete an email but much harder to cut someone off on the phone”. In the world of publicity, personal communication is essential to success. In conclusion, Truda stressed the need to be creative and make a campaign stand out from the crowd, whichever media you are using to put your message across.
     In the following question and answer session, many interesting questions were asked, including “How useful are author blogs?”(good for tapping a fan base but need to be regularly updated) and “What about Second Life?” (complicated to use so the market reached is negligible). Overall the feeling seemed to be that new technology is great for marketing if you can find the right way to use it.
 
29 November 2008

InPrint: News

London SYP Speaker Meeting - Publicity: Staying in the Public Eye

SYP welcomed Danuta Kean, Rosie Glaisher and Pru Rowlandson to October’s Speaker Meeting. Each has had a unique experience of working within the field of publicity and they were able to offer some useful advice to budding publicists.
 
Glaisher has been Publicity Director at Penguin Press since 2000 and has focused on publicising a wide range of non-fiction titles from Allen Lane as well as Penguin Classics. For those out there who did not know, publicising books involves any sort of promotion or coverage as long as it does not cost any money. Glaisher states: ‘It’s surprising that so many authors do not realise this.’ Lots of people have the idea that working in publicity involves lots of glamorous launch parties. The truth is that this is only a very small part of most publicity roles, although it is a sociable business on the whole. Glaisher confides: ‘lavish launch parties are a huge strain on financial resources and there are so many other ways in which to launch a new title.’ Publicists can take advantage of free publicity from newspapers and magazines not to mention bookshop events and literary festivals. Glaisher emphasises that communicating with other departments, such as rights, editorial and sales is essential for successfully publicising a title. As well as this, keeping in touch with the author and checking that they can attend certain events in advance is recommended! Above all keep in mind the personal qualities needed. Glaisher states that these are: ‘Organisation, persistence and team playing. And always look forward!’
 
Rowlandson is Publicity Director at Granta and Portobello books and has been heavily involved with literary festivals such as the Debut Author’s Festival. She wishes to remove the myth that publicity involves champagne parties and promoting blockbuster beasts: ‘quite often I may have to promote a little-heard-of Polish author which is always a challenge.’ Rowlandson urges young publicists to consider every option and think outside the box. Keeping abreast of current events and trends is one way to stay ahead. Rowlandson swears by the Today programme on Radio 4. ‘Anything can happen in the news and this might be something that might publicise one of your authors. Your author might be an expert on a subject that is getting a lot of current media attention. Seize the day and push them into the limelight.’
 
Kean is a freelance journalist and publishing commentator whose work has appeared in The Times and The Financial Times. A prolific writer, she has contributed to many other publications as well as presenting Textual Analysis on Channel4Radio. She agrees with Rowlandson; if your author is an expert on a certain subject, push them forward. Niche communities are very active and have multitudinous magazines and web pages that may be exploited by publicists. Kean is not sure about Facebook and MySpace as a means of publicising an author. ‘It has to be interactive and stimulating to be worth it’, she states. Another thing to consider is the fact that the BBC do not offer as much coverage as they used to. This can be a plus, ‘but bear in mind that if you phone up BBC Leicester wanting your author to talk on a show, they must have a direct link to Leicester itself!’
 
This useful talk closed with questions and our trio of experts concluded that the secret of a good publicist is managing the author’s expectations in balance with mining for exciting ideas. With that, we all went to the pub around the corner to think about it over a nice pint of something.
13 November 2008

InPrint: News

Why Does Jonathan Ross Say These Things?

Jonathan Ross' bookGeorgina Baillie, the young woman at the centre of the controversy surrounding the lewd remarks left by Jonathan Ross and Russell Brand on Andrew Sach’s answer machine, has now called on the BBC to reinstate both their stars, saying that their punishment was “out of proportion”.  Unfortunately for both Ross and Brand, Baillie has chosen a very bad day for disseminating such good news, as unfortunately, that little local election thingy across the pond has hogged up all the headlines, unlike the days when Baillie had previously called for their heads.  Whether you like Jonathan Ross or not, you may have some sympathy with him, especially when you consider the fact that John Cleese regularly verbally, physically, and racially abused Andrew Sachs all the time in the seventies, and nobody ever complained.
    The most unfortunate part of the affair (especially if you’re a book publicist) is that Friday Night with Jonathan Ross has now been taken off the air in the run-up to Christmas, the most important part of the year for promoting those book-type things that we all love.  A Bit of Fry and Laurie once declared that the most important part of comedy is timing, and Jonathan Ross’s timing here was diabolical.  Unless, of course, he was aiming for a good bit of ironical, black comedy.  As you may not know, Jonathan Ross has a book out at the moment, the rather aptly titled Why Do I Say These Things? (although I suspect the paperback edition – if there is one – might have an expletive added to it, along with “the”).  At first, the cynic in me suspected that this whole Sachs scandal was a publicity stunt to promote Ross’s book.  If so, it’s one that’s backfired magnificently, as The Bookseller reported today that sales of both Ross’s and Brand’s books have fallen dramatically in the wake of the controversy.  No doubt Ross is wishing that the little chimp on the cover had held onto his mouth a bit more firmly. Yet, I suspect that Ross’s real sin was to have made an ass of himself during these current inclement times.  Ross’s £6 million a year salary was controversial enough during the boom years, so it’s clear that it wouldn’t be tolerated for long at the start of what some commentators believe could be the worst recession for generations.
    So, Ross and Russell have now, inappropriately enough, damaged their ‘brand’ names for who knows how long.  The only winner appears to have been the burlesque dancer Georgina Baillie, who may one day get a book deal out of it.  However, let’s hope that no other book sales will have been damaged in the meantime in the publicity void left by the suspension of Jonathan Ross’s shows.

Kevin Mahoney

05 November 2008

InPrint: News

SYP Meet the Committee Social

On Wednesday 15 October, the SYP gathered for drinks and mingling in the Champagne Bar at the International in St Martin’s Lane. The event was well attended by members new and old, from those hoping to take their first step into publishing and hoping to find out more about the industry, through to first-jobbers looking to make some great contacts and old-timers willing to share the benefits of their experience.
 
The event also provided a chance for members to meet the committee who voluntarily run the SYP and to find out about opportunities to get more involved when positions on the committee become available in January of next year. Free books courtesy of Headline, bags from Vintage and wine and nibbles were all much appreciated by the crowds – a big thank you to Social Secretary Angie Solomon for organising the event.
 
 
  
20 October 2008

InPrint: News

Lightning Source Study Tour

Lighting Source exteriorThe Lightning Source Study Tour started bright and early on the morning of October 1st. About 25 people turned up, a very good response to the SYP's first Study Tour for many years.  The attendees came from a variety of publishers and backgrounds. There was a small editorial coterie from Springer, who were eager to learn more about Lightning Source, a company with whom they do much business. Ashley Lodge, HarperCollins' Corporate Responsibility Manager and Chair of the Publishers' Green Network, was there to learn more about Print-on-Demand's green credentials.  Suzanne Collier from Bookcareers.com, was another of the luminaries present.  I, for one, was looking forward to returning to Milton Keynes, where I lived for many years while working for Amazon. Indeed, I was delighted when we passed my former place of employ, Amazon's Marston Gate Distribution centre. I texted one of my ex-colleagues, and told them that I was on a Study Tour to Lightning Source, whereupon I was informed that Marston Gate was now doing Print-on-Demand. Perhaps Lightning Source had a competitor in their midst? However, I soon concluded that Amazon's POD1 facility was more likely to be aimed at self-publishing authors, rather than publishers. 
We were warmly greeted upon our arrival at Lightning Source, and after we had been refreshed by coffee and biscuits, Commercial Director Suzanne Wilson-Higgins gave a presentation about the key facets of Print-on-Demand (see copy of her PowerPoint talk below). Suzanne went onto explain that Lightning Source operates on a business to business model, and and that they discourage approaches from self-published authors, referring them instead to publishing services companies such as Authorhouse, who are also based in Milton Keynes. Tim Davies from Authorhouse then went onto talk about the phenomenon of self-publishing, which has increased exponentially in the US (see a copy of his PowerPoint presentation below).
Here three books are printed simultaneously to improve efficiencyNext, we were lead on a tour of the Lightning Source warehouse, which was every bit as chilly as I remembered Marston Gate to be. Much of the warehouse was empty, indicative of Lightning Source's confidence in their ability to win new orders and to expand their business. We saw several state-of-the-art printers in action, fed by massive bales of paper. The paper  was then subjected to several chemical processes to ensure best quality. However, much of the procedures involved manual handling by well-trained staff rather than being wholly dependent on the mechanisation that we had imagined to exist prior to the tour. I was interested to see that Lightning Source was fulfilling orders to Amazon at Marston Gate, confirming my impression that Amazon's own POD process is aimed more at self-publishers rather than Lightning Source's business to business approach2. This point was then reinforced by Lightning Source's Managing Director David Taylor, after we had then been treated to an excellent lunch. David was most amusing as he ruminated on the differences between Lightning Source's bases in Nashville and Milton Keynes, as he rounded up a very enjoyable day.

1). ”POD” - acronym for “Print-on-Demand
2). However, as I've just read on the thetill.co.uk, Amazon.co.uk's POD service has clients such as Faber & Faber, John Wiley, Cambridge University Press, and HarperCollins - you read it on the InPrint Online first!

Kevin Mahoney

02 October 2008

InPrint: News

SYP/JFL Digital Skills Evening

SYP/JFL digital skills eveningThe SYP/JFL Digital Skills Evening started with an ironic delay, as when we tested the technical equipment, we discovered that the only laptop at hand wouldn't fire up Nicholas Blake's presentation.  It would not be the last time during the evening when SYP Chair Jon Slack had to show off his own digital skills as he laboured to get the recalcitrant laptop to fire up.  Having spent enough time in front of my own PC for the day, I wandered back out to the excellent nibbles and drinks laid on by the evening’s co-hosts, JFL. The temporary absence of a more traditional technology (a corkscrew), did not delay my consumption of a splendid glass of wine.
  Ros Kindersley, JFL’s Managing Director, was the first speaker, and began by saying that two years ago, JFL were beginning to be approached by publishers asking them to fill new "digital" vacancies.  Since these skill sets were so new, Ros and her team were wondering about how best to go about filling these jobs. She began by relating the well-known detrimental effects that digital had on the music industry, before discussing the birth of the e-book. Of all publishing departments, Production seems to be particularly affected, with new mediums such as CD-Rom or downloads to deal with. SEO* skills and a basic knowledge of html seem to be the main requirements for this new digital environment. She concluded that recruiters are looking for candidates that have the imagination to make best use of this digital world; along with the responsibility to monitor content they create, such as online forums.
  Chris Meade, Director of the Institute for the Future of the Book, said that those who are creating digital media are disappointed by the e-book, whose format is still quite conventional. Where does Publishing fit in this digital world? Isn't something new going to emerge, to take Publishing’s place? Chris then quoted Bob Stein’s counter argument: “far from becoming obsolete, publishers and editors in the networked era have a crucial role to play. The editor of the future is increasingly a producer, a role that includes signing up projects and overseeing all elements of production and distribution, and that of course includes building and nurturing communities of various demographics, size, and shape. Successful publishers will build brands around curatorial and community building know-how AND be really good at designing and developing the robust technical infrastructures that underlie a complex range of user experiences” (from Bob Stein’s Unified Theory of Publishing). Chris doesn't think that traditional publishers are in the best place to deal with this world, and said that folk such as the organisers of the Small Wonder Short Story festival are more equipped to deal with digital, as they are accomplished at online networking. Writers think they can now dispense with agents, but they still need to call on marketing and editing skills. Chris Meade concurred with Ros when he said, “the digital future is there for people who can think afresh”. He continued to say that books of the future should be more engaged with their audience, but also that e-books need to be more focused, and not attempt to cover everything, a la Wikipedia.
  Nicholas Blake, (the Editorial Manager of Picador and Digital), started by saying that editors don't need new skills, but they do need new knowledge. Nicholas joined the industry a couple of years before the web was developed. So, despite seeing a lot of changes in the industry, he said that the editorial processes are the same as they were twenty years ago. Macmillan are publishing their e-books with the same quality of attention as their paper cousins. Nicholas said that although e-books seem to be cheaper than traditional products, they could often be more expensive, as they involve a lot of additional work that is not immediately apparent to the reader. Yet Macmillan would be appearing to do things right, as their digital products are the second most popular on the new Waterstones e-book store.
  We then had a mini technical breakdown, as the laptop went to sleep again, although it did soon revive with Jon’s help. Nicholas showed us an e-book with an index, and said that it cost could 20 cents per link according to some pricing models; sometimes the extra cost is built in, as with Picador's current converter. Some e-books are better designed than others, which Nicholas revealed by showing off examples of the good and the bad. Nicholas went on to say that you don't need to know html, you just think more carefully about how your content will look in its new format. He then gave us some examples of ebook layouts, starting with Doctor Who (Pocket Essentials - click here for screenshot), which has a "clear layout, helpful bookmarks, italic and bold all converted successfully; but the index is not hyperlinked so is useless".  Nicholas moved onto an edition of A Passage to India (pub. Rosetta Books - click here for screenshot): "no sign of any thought. Meaningless emblem to go with the chapter heading, every paragraph is full out, no italics for book titles, basic typesetting mistakes".
  Then the projector started playing up! Nicholas continued by advising that you have to pay attention to the metadata to provide a good reading experience. The Sony Reader has a whole set of fields that the editor can enter, but Nicholas warned against making elementary mistakes, such as stating that the Irish author John Banville is writing in British English, as this simple error may prevent readers from finding the book in the e-store.  So as long as you’re good at filling in forms, you should do fine.
  Then the floor was thrown open to questions. An audience member asked Chris what he thought of Amazon's relations with say, small publishers. Chris said that such publishers have other avenues to explore online, to avoid being trapped in unfavourable and possibly monopolistic terms.
  Ros then went on to reassure everyone by saying that the publishing experience is more important than having these new technical skills. People with more technical skills are being brought into Publishing from other industries, especially with regards to Marketing, rather than Editorial, but a lot of such digital work is outsourced. Ros observed people in Publishing are more or less training themselves, by participating in online social networks etc. Nicholas was asked if it was possible to transfer illustrated content to e-books, to which he said yes, but you have to adapt it to maximise your content. A member of the audience then pointed out that there is a lot of help online, which started off a lively debate in the audience.  Chris contributed by saying that most of the recruiters placing ads won't necessarily know much about these new technical skills, and that there is possible room for negotiating with employers if you don’t have all the technical skills requested in a job advertisement. Another audience member pointed out that the SEO practices recognised by Google involve quite simple editorial skills (although Google is perhaps a tad more monopolistic than even Amazon, methinks, but that’s a much bigger debate). 
  This is the only time that I’ve seen a debate break out on the floor of an SYP event, and I think this is probably because we are all of us feeling our way into this new digital world.  With some many new avenues to explore, we can only really find the way to our goals with the help of others.  Which, appropriately enough, is all very Web 2.0.

*SEO = “Search Engine Optimisation”, i.e. the art of getting your website ranked higher than your competitors’.

Click here to read Nicholas Blake's notes for his talk.

Kevin Mahoney

29 September 2008

InPrint: News

A Practical Guide to the Frankfurt Book Fair

On 15th – 19th October, the world’s most famous book fair will be taking place in the heart of Frankfurt. In preparation for the publishing event of the year, the SYP and Frankfurt Book Fair organisers held a special talk at the Goethe Institute, giving some top tips on making the most of the experience.
     Thomas Minkus, Vice President of Frankfurt Book Fair Marketing and Sales, started proceedings by explaining the sheer scale of the fair. With 101 countries participating, 13 show floors, and 172,000 square metres of exhibition space, it’s hardly surprising that people can be overwhelmed. Thomas outlined exactly why the book fair is so well-attended and why it is such an important event in the publishing calendar. “One of the key factors is access to a lot of people”, he explained. With so many companies in attendance, the opportunities to meet with some of the most influential people in the industry and grow your business are among the main reasons to go to Frankfurt. The chance to do some serious market research is another valuable aspect of the fair. Over 400,000 titles are on display and it is a perfect opportunity to investigate what sells and why it sells. Frankfurt also provides a wide range of events and educational programmes, over 400 of which are in the English language.
     Edward Milford, Executive Chairman of environmental publisher, Earthscan, chaired the event and shared his own experiences of surviving Frankfurt. He acknowledged that the first time he went he had no idea what to expect and even suffered from a case of what he called “Bookfair-itis”. Edward explained that he was in awe of both the number of unknown people (cured most easily by a glass or two of wine) and the number of books. He also highlighted the importance of face-to-face contact that book fairs provide. “Some people you only see once a year at Frankfurt” and the favoured modern method of communication, email, simply doesn’t allow for chatting and making a personal connection in the same way as a meeting in real life.
     Edward then introduced the first speaker, Diane Spivey, who works for Little, Brown Book Group as Rights and Contracts Director. Being part of a large, long-established publishers, Diane is incredibly busy at the fair and said over the space of five days, she currently only has three free meeting slots remaining for this year’s Frankfurt. She stressed the need to be extremely organised and well-informed on competitors’ books, as well as providing catalogues and information sheets on your own books. For her, the book fair is about starting new business and concluding deals that are in progress. Other tips included don’t wear high heels and guard your notebook with your life! “If you can survive Frankfurt, you can survive anything”.
     Lynette Owen, Copyright Director at Pearson Education, then spoke about the way Frankfurt Book Fair has changed over the years. Since her first time at Frankfurt in 1981, Lynette said the pace was considerably faster and the pressure can be intense. Thanks to Blackberries and mobile phones, you are never entirely out of touch with the office, and this isn’t necessarily a good thing. However, Lynette noted the slight sense of drama and the opportunity to be single-minded for a week as two of the big benefits of the fair. Her advice to Frankfurt novices is when meeting people “make it clear if you are buying or selling” and plan your evening social life as much as your daytime schedule or you may end up eating at McDonalds.
     Following Lynette was Peter Newsom, Export Sales Director of Headline Publishing Group. This year will be Peter’s 30th consecutive year at Frankfurt. “That means 7 months of my life have been in Frankfurt”, he laughed. Peter also stressed the importance of organisation and forward planning: “If you haven’t organised by now, it’s probably too late. Sorry to depress you!” If you need to book a stall, for example, this must be done by February for the following October. Hotels, flights and restaurants often also need to be booked fairly far in advance of the event. Peter pointed out that the focus of the fair is selling and it’s important to remember you are selling your products, your company and, indeed, yourself the whole time you are in Frankfurt. His survival kit included Berocca, Strepsils, paracetamol and mints and he also highlighted the benefits of knowing a little German: “If someone offers you Sekt, they are talking about wine and nothing more salacious”.
     Emma Hayley, Managing Director of SelfMade Hero, a manga and graphic novel publisher, was the last to speak. Coming from a small, independent background, Emma’s perspective was slightly different. She explained how, frequently unable to secure meetings in advance in the early days, she would have to approach people at the fair in the hopes of grabbing them in between meetings. Emma sees the fair as a place to seek inspiration: “There’s a real buzz and energy about the place”.
     For the last half hour Edward Milford invited the audience to ask the speakers questions. One important question asked was what does the future hold for Frankfurt? The general concensus seemed to be that the fair is still thriving and will continue to be a crucial international meeting place for people in publishing. Creating personal relationships across continents is an essential part of the modern publishing world and fairs like Frankfurt make the personal touch possible. When asked how the fair might develop, the speakers suggested there may be increased interest from related technical and media industries. Certainly, it looks like this year’s fair will be as exciting as ever and the overriding message seemed to be that those who go well-prepared will surely be in for an enjoyable experience.
23 September 2008

InPrint: News

Canon Tales: Promoting Creativity in Publishing

Wednesday 16th July saw the launch of Canon Tales – an innovative event created by Doug Wallace and Jon Slack, 2007 and 2008 chairs of the SYP. Twelve figures from the publishing industry spoke to a captive audience at the Cochrane Theatre, conveying their own personal take on creativity in publishing.
 
Canon Tales was conceived two years ago, when Doug Wallace heard about a similar event for creative professionals in architecture that proved to be a huge success. Jon shares Doug’s belief that publishing is overlooked as a creative industry, and Canon Tales seeks to redress this.
 
Each speaker told their canon tale to the backdrop of visual images – 20 images, each lasting for 21 seconds, thus totalling a seven-minute presentation. Some were personal stories, some were focused on the speakers’ own output.
 
First to take the stage was Rob Williams, Creative Director of Penguin. He chose to speak about the launch of the new James Bond book, Devil May Care by Sebastian Faulks. His slides showed us figures and pictures from the marketing campaign for this book, whilst Rob gave the audience some maxims that he has discovered during his publishing career, including ‘Make a story at every stage’, ‘Engage in creative collaboration’, ‘Limit access to the product and create theatre around its launch’, and ‘If nobody wants to talk about it, it doesn’t work.’
 
Alan Gilliland, Illustrator and Publisher at Raven’s Quill, took a more personal approach to his canon tale. His slides showed examples of his own work, as he told us about his career, which started in photography for newspapers. He was then offered the first graphics job on a regional newspaper, before moving to the Telegraph, where he worked on complex graphic representations of disaster stories, which often had to be completed in a day. Other projects we saw include archaeological work for English Heritage and Time Team, his book on war machines and a new disaster series. Finally, we were shown his real love – highly illustrated books for children that also work on adult levels – ‘this is what,’ Alan told us, ‘I left the Telegraph for!’
 
Erica Jarnes, Editor at Bloomsbury, was next to speak. Her varied slides were tied together by a theme of the things that inspire her in publishing, including the comma, paper, Japanese colour printing, typefaces, Pale Fire, mushroom hunting, the Harry Potter 7 launch, and strange submissions (such as the story of the holocaust from an otter’s perspective). She loves publishing, she told us, because it brings together ‘ideas, talents, budgets and egos!’
 
Richard Bucht, Art/Design Buyer at Waterstone’s, showed us a selection of inventive covers that he felt worked particularly well, one particularly memorable example being for a book entitled Designers are Wankers.
 
Phil Baines, Designer, Author and Professor of Typography at Central St Martins, has freelanced for the last twelve years, mainly for small arts publishers, as well as some of the larger ones. He spoke of the interesting people, interesting material, and interested people that he has encountered in his career in book design, which includes the covers for the Great Ideas series from Penguin. He also spoke about his association with Matt’s Galley in east London, showing us slides from a particularly unusually designed book he produced – a book within a book, bound in eight page sections with perforated edges.
 
The final speaker in the first half of the event was Alessandro Gallenzi, Publisher at Alma Books and Oneworld Classics Ltd. He began by showing us historical timelines, and his own place in the world put into perspective by events, including the release of Harry Potter! We saw his progression from literature-loving school boy in Italy, through National Service to a student of English Language and Literature with Russian. Though offered a PhD at Leeds University, he chose to pursue a career in publishing, launching Hesperus Press with his wife. Hesperus turned out to be a huge success, publishing mostly translations and forgotten classics, and focusing on high-quality marketing. In 2005, Alessandro and his wife moved on to a new challenge – Alma Books, concentrating on English and international literary fiction. 2007 saw the launch of their next project – Oneworld Classics. Alessandro will publish around 100 titles this year over three imprints, but his final slide – a picture of his two small children – reminded us that this is the future of publishing.
 
After a chance to refresh ourselves and mingle at the bar during the interval, the second half of Canon Tales was opened by Richard Charkin, Executive Director at Bloomsbury. His was another personal story, beginning with his entry into publishing at Harrap’s in High Holborn, in the times before computers and sales figures, then moving to Pergamon Press and Oxford University Press. He showed us the cover of the Oxford Textbook of Medicine – still in print, despite his exaggeration of the truth in order to be allowed to commission it. He then moved to the Octopus publishing group, had a brief stint studying at Harvard Business School, and was then asked to move to Macmillan as CEO, where he wrote the Charkin blog, which had 4000 visitors a day. He then met Nigel Newton, and moved to Bloomsbury. ‘We won’t find another Harry Potter,’ he said, ‘but we will do our best for every reader, everywhere.’ He finished by saying that although all of the key figures in his career that he had shown in his slides were men, the future of publishing is obviously much broader than this, showing us a slide of his wife with his two granddaughters.
 
Next was Ellie Kilburn, a freelance designer. Ellie began a Master’s in Communication Design at Central Saint Martins, specialising in print and editorial design. She showed us a range of work from her peers of the course, as well as her own, from a project re-configuring text as notation, almost like music, to an exploration of the book as a physical object in the environment.
 
Ashley Lodge, Corporate Responsibility Manager at HarperCollins, showed us some highlights from his time in this particular role. As HarperCollins is such a large and diverse publisher, obviously some of its list focuses on the environment, of which we were shown a selection. We also saw the FSC logo that HarperCollins developed with the Forest Stewardship Council, with the aim of educating the reader as to what FSC approved paper really is. We also saw one of HCUK’s forthcoming titles, ACME Climate Change. Designed to be pulled apart and used for environmental projects, printed in the UK using vegetable inks and FSC paper. Ashley then showed us some of he human side of HCUK’s contribution – bringing books to people in Ghana and following up the donation of resources such as computers with training.
 
Angharad Lewis is Deputy Editor of GRAFIK magazine who spoke about the book as a physical object, with a physical life – kinetic objects that don’t just have an internal existence. We saw images of books that had physical acts such as bookmarks and dog-eared pages incorporated as design features.
 
Tom Chivers, Artistic Director of Penned in the Margins, was next, with an engaging, poetic piece called How to Build a City, perfectly timing his tale of East London to the eye-catching slides.
 
The evening concluded with Andrzej Klimowski, Graphic Novelist and Professor of Illustration at RCA. He spoke of his wonder at how stories start, showing us his own illustrations of an encounter with an insect-like woman he followed to a school of entomology, and his imaginings of how the story would have developed had he continued to follow her. We were treated to a viewing of work from his new book – a graphic realisation of Bulgakov’s The Master and Margarita, published by SelfMadeHero. He also showed us a selection of his book cover designs for Faber, including some of the 60 P.G. Wodehouse covers he has designed – though there are still 23 left!
 
Doug Wallace and Jon Slack closed the evening by thanking the vast number of people who had made the evening possible, and the satisfied audience exited for more mingling and networking to round up a stimulating and unique evening.
18 July 2008

InPrint: News

Farewell to Walkies

On the eve of Tuesday 8th July 2008, a host of booksellers and publishers (and the SYP of course) invaded the streets of London en masse, donned in fancy dress, to enjoy the last ever BTBS “Walkies”.
The Book Trade Benevolent Society’s annual charity walk has been the charity’s major fundraising event for several years and this year proved to be as popular as ever, with hundreds of people participating in the walk to help raise money for disadvantaged people in the book trade.
This year’s fancy dress theme for the SYP was Alice in Wonderland.  Alongside the Mad Hatter and his associates, many other colourful characters attended the walk from Supergirl and Bugs Bunny to Amy Winehouse and an alarming number of Alan Carrs.
The sponsored walk took these unlikely participants on a merry (and often tipsy) dance through various book-related checkpoints in central London. Stopping off for re-fuelling at a variety of venues such as Samuel French, Waterstones and Bloomsbury, revellers picked up refreshments and goodies before making their way to the party at Sugar Reef to indulge in more eating and drinking, and even a little dancing.

Another huge success for the BTBS, many people in the publishing world will be sad to say goodbye to “Walkies” but BTBS chief executive David Hicks has said he wants to seek an alternative way for fundraising in future years. Let’s hope it’s as enjoyable as this jolly jaunt round London has proven to be.

 

15 July 2008

InPrint: News

Pirate Punting and Pimms on the River Cherwell

 

 

 

Hitting the bank more often than a Wall Street trader, the piratical punters of the SYP ambled, nay slumped, up the Cherwell in search of distant lands.

 

 

 

 

 

 In the time it took to consume hearty portions of their grog rations the cartographers on board duly noted the discovery of the Marston Ferry Road; an occurrence so grandiose in magnitude that the band of swarthy, moustachioed men and women banked purposefully to admire this natural beauty amongst the rolling hills and meadows.

 

 

 

 

 

 Avast, the Jolly Roger was raised! Camaraderie swelled amongst the fleet, joyous at the arrival of their destination without loss of limb or life. The booty from previous expeditions to supermarkets was shared out according to want and need and, when each was satiated, the journey home commenced.

 

 

 

 

 

 The wind was favourable as experienced hands punted and paddled home in half the time. Crowds gathered. Ropes were thrown landward. Boats moored. The party commenced. Quiche, olives, pastries and Pimms. Pirate songs could be heard on the air in surrounding townships before the sun began to set and the pirate punters became publishers again.

 

 

 

07 July 2008

InPrint: News

London Speaker Meeting: Book Production - A Matter of Ethics?

May’s speaker meeting covered the issue of ethics in book production, a topic that is gaining more and more attention both inside the publishing industry and without, and seems to be of particular interest to young publishers – last year’s SYP annual conference took ethical publishing as its theme.
 
Chairing the discussion was Ashley Lodge, Corporate Responsibility Manager at HarperCollins UK and Chair of the Publishers’ Green Network. He was joined by David Penfold, who teaches digital media and technology change within the Publishing MA at London College of Communication; Alex Markham, who works in Environment and Health and Safety at Reed Elsevier; and Sam Mawson, Project Controller in the production department at Egmont UK.
 
Ashley opened the proceedings by explaining his background and the origin of his current role at HCUK. Starting off as a dictionary editor, he climbed the editorial ranks to become commissioning editor at HarperCollins. In 2005, a staff engagement and renewal plan gave him the opportunity to involve himself in the green policies of his company, and the role grew to a full-time position, in which he devotes around 75 per cent of his time to environmental initiatives and the remaining 25 per cent to charity projects.
 
Reducing energy and water consumption, as Ashley went on to say, is one aspect (not exclusive to publishing houses) of ethical working practice, but issues more specifically associated with the industry include paper, ink and glue usage, returns, and the question of how green the e-book really is; all points that were covered during the discussion.
 
David Penfold spoke about the role that publishing education plays in ethical issues. He pointed out that, although he thought that publishing education could be doing more to promote ethical working practices, this seems to be an area of interest to many students, citing the example of Publishing MA students at LCC who refused to fly to Barcelona on a study trip last year. Several dissertations have also been focused on production ethics, with one original survey finding that most people asked are in favour of ethical working practices, but many are not able, or in some instances not willing, to pay the associated costs. The realities of cost constraints were demonstrated in an anecdote about a student magazine – the students working on it were keen to use recycled paper in a bid to be ethical, but as they were getting much of the paper they were using for free they were unable to be too discerning about what they eventually used.
 
Alex Markham took ‘how green are e-books’ as his starting point, and described a full life-cycle analysis of Fuel, one of the magazines published by Elsevier. A life-cycle study involves breaking down every single aspect of the production process and assessing all the energy that goes into making a product. In fact, this may not even be possible, as you may end up looking at all the energy in the universe but, as Alex stated, it all boils down to understanding how much energy is taken from the sun and utilised in making the magazine.
 
Fuel, Alex told us, volunteered for the project, which demonstrates the importance of getting people on-side – the ability to communicate is the most important tool when you work in CSR, as it can be difficult for one person to make much of a difference.
 
The five stages involved in the life-cycle analysis were as follows:
 
  • Preparation of the magazine – Kiddlington
  • Typesetting – India
  • Printing and distribution (hard copies) – UK
  • Online hosting – US
  • Ecological footprint (the physical space needed to support enough plants to produce the energy needed to make the product)
 
The study looked at whether there was any benefit in not sending out hard copies of the magazine, and providing it on the internet instead. In the case of Fuel, the end-user result is actually the most important factor. Environmentally speaking, the project found that there is not much difference between print and online delivery, but a lot of difference is made by how people use the end product – whether they print or photocopy it, for example. This means that the magazine’s producers can try to influence the way that people use their product, and advise them of the best way to read it if they want to be environmentally friendly and use less energy. As Alex pointed out, though some may think that this project hasn’t actually changed anything, ‘if you don’t measure it, you can’t manage it’; the information is now there.
 
Sam Mawson’s focus was paper – ‘the life blood of printing’ – perhaps unsurprisingly given that he started his publishing career as PA to Alison Kennedy, Egmont’s production director, who has been instrumental in making publishers aware of where their paper actually comes from. Pressure from NGOs on publishers to find out what the paper they were using was made of and where it came from proved fairly fruitless, until Alison Kennedy, working with consultants, came up with the Egmont grading system. Egmont were faced with the challenge of identifying and breaking down the components and sources of 160 papers, some of which had up to ten pulp sources. By October 2005, they had achieved clean status, and published the first book made completely of FSC-approved paper (including the cover and endpapers). In September 2006, they began to extend the Egmont grading system to the rest of the publishing industry – at this stage, around 45 per cent of the publishing industry have adopted the systems (see PREPS), and this number is gradually creeping up.
 
Sam went on to speak about ethics and obligations in publishing, particularly focusing on China, and the question of whether we should be working there at all, though if publishers didn’t print in the Far East, many types of books wouldn’t be affordable or feasible to produce. The key, Sam suggested, is to thoroughly know your suppliers. Egmont has a code of conduct, laying out certain criteria that all their suppliers have to meet, including no child labour, using only voluntary workers, complying with wage laws in that country, and maintaining a safe working and living environment. To ensure that these conditions are met, a supplier must pass the Egmont audit or an ICTI care audit, both of which are carried out by a third party, therefore ensuring that the auditors and inspectors are independent from anyone who might profit.
 
Ashley summarised the meeting followed by questions from the audience, the first of which was whether the speakers think that publishers are keen on environmental and ethical work practice because they really care or because it’s a fashionable cause at the moment. All the speakers agreed that although good PR isn’t a bad thing, ethical working practice is actually very hard to achieve and people wouldn’t be doing it if they didn’t genuinely care. They also suggested that the UK publishing industry has actually been ahead of consumer demand in this area.
 
The next question was whether NGOs such as Greenpeace were the real motivators in the move towards ethical practice in the publishing industry. The consensus was that the awareness initially came from such organisations, who have the resources to go and research these issues, but that the important thing was how companies then react to such information.
 
Ashley was then asked what, if he had a magic wand, would he change with returns policies. Ashley told us that in an ideal world, he would end shredding, as this is an inefficient use of a product – he would implement cross-industry collaboration to get unsold books to charities and in use to raise literacy levels – he is in fact in discussion about this at the moment.
 
In answer to whether big companies or independents are making more headway in working ethically and environmentally, we were told that even a small group of people can make a difference, but as independents produce a smaller amount of books, a smaller sector of the market is influenced. This is where the Publishers Green Network comes in – it aims to share information with everyone in the industry, and to help smaller publishers who may not have the resources to go green all by themselves. Sam also pointed out that PREPS can help smaller publishers to provide answers about their paper sources that they may not have the resources to investigate.
 
The final question returned to the eternal question of how to make the e-book a serious green option. This is still an issue that is difficult to assess until the industry knows a little more about how e-books and e-book readers will develop – until a unified format that will work across the industry is identified or comes to the fore, it is not really an option to instigate studies looking into the carbon footprint of e-book readers and e-books.
 
19 June 2008

InPrint: News

90,000 Make Hay (even when the sun doesn't shine)

 
2008 marked the 21st anniversary of the world renowned literary festival in the tiny mid-Wales town of Hay-on-Wye. Located on the river at the foot of the black mountains, Hay is a beautiful little market town that feels slightly aloof. The sign on entering Hay reads 'Town of Books', a boast backed up by the 31 book shops in the town, that's 1 for every 60 residents.
 
    The Hay festival, sponsored by the Guardian and visited by an estimated 90,000 people from around the world, started out as a small gathering of book enthusiasts funded by a poker win. Some will say the festival has evolved and improved since the early days when the speaker meetings were held in the various pubs in the town, others will argue that the machine has bulldozed this secret little haven into a large, corporate event. Most though, would agree that there is nothing else like this festival at present, and it's growth over the years has attracted Nobel prize winners, former US presidents and the biggest names in UK publishing, both books and magazines.
 
    The festival runs for 10 days, and in the 3 that I was present, big names include recently ousted Prime Minister's wife and feminist QC, Cherie Blair, Ex-US president and keen Human Rights champion, Jimmy Carter, controversial The Fall frontman, Mark E Smith, and recently single, Salman Rushdie, to name but a few. There was world music (including cult Malian band Tinariwen), comedy (not just on the official bill, but a fringe festival too), art exhibitions (including a piece started by Jon Burgeman which the public were encouraged to contribute to), yoga sessions (including animal yoga positions for the kids), and dance workshops (everything from traditional ballet to urban hip hop).The intellectual morsels on offer were eclectic and intriguing; politics, food, war, alternative therapy, mortality, religion and history, there is something to satisfy even the most picky palate at Hay.
 
    Also spotted: a circus in a field on the way out of Hay; big queues for Vietnamese coffee in the castle courtyard; 2 chickens and a sheep in hutches and the poshest portaloos I've ever seen. English weather is notoriously unpredictable, especially when there's a festival taking place it would seem, but the setting and the unpredictable weather gave rise to a definite sense that anything could happen. Indeed, I watched the rigging in the tents with not a small amount of unease at times. But Saturday was gorgeous, and people were making full use of the small grass courtyard, peppered with canvas sun loungers in the centre of it all.
    The Guardian have covered the event pretty much faultlessly, and I would urge you to read the write-ups and watch the podcasts if you didn't make it to Hay this year. But I will give a run-down of a few of my favourites which will be posted here over the coming weeks.
 
 
 
04 June 2008

InPrint: News

The 2008 Annual SYP Pub Quiz

The 2008 annual SYP pub quiz, in aid of book trade charity BTBS, saw 26 teams (some 190 publishers, agents and friends) battle it out over seven rounds at Tiger Tiger on London’s Haymarket. A venue used to seeing dance floor grooves and lamp-lit passion became the province of bookish pursuit of points for prizes. My team, led by last year’s Chair Doug Wallace, were perched close to the bar, a precarious place for any publisher.

Red wine at night, publisher's delight

The occasion was set up to raise money for the BTBS: the SYP did just that, trouncing last year's £320 with some £1500 through team registration and raffle sales on the night.

The markers get stuck in, led by Mia Kilroy, near left

The beloved wooden spoon was 'won' by The Hybrid Embryos from Reader's Digest, finishing with 27.5 points.

Our view of the big screen

At the other end of the table, 'Bjorn Borg Ate My Hamster', a literary agent miscellany featuring staff from the likes of Andrew Nurnberg and Johnson & Alcock, among others, stumped up an impressive 44.5 points to come 3rd.

Wallace and Mattu get cosy for the camera

In second place, flashing their publishing credentials with highly animated vigour from the back of room, were The Bookseller on 47.5 points, who were presented with gift-wrapped champagne and chocolates kindly donated by Waitrose Food and Home Canary Wharf.

First place came from the Random House quarter: we had 'International Rescue' trumping at the top on 48.5. They graciously accepted their four bottles of red and four bottles of white, again as donated very kindly by Waitrose Food and Home and by now probably strewn across Haymarket.

From Random House, the winners: L-R: Davide Ferrauto, Gemma Hamerton, Jana Jonekova, Nikki Griffiths, Craig Pass, Alison Rhodes, Justin Ward-Turner and Mike Abbott


On that note we'd like to thank the many sponsors who contributed to some fantastic raffle prizes and helped us pull in over £500 in ticket sales on the night!

Chair Jon Slack, Simon Juden and a punter with some very large books

Grateful thanks go to Simon Juden, Chief Executive of the Publishers Association, who did a wonderful job of compering for the evening. Several jokes raised the bar for SYP Quiz Comperes to come, and he even admitted to having Pink Floyd’s Dark Side of the Moon playing in his car on the way the quiz.

Our awesome compere Simon Juden with Vice Chair Tori Hunt


Thanks must go to the SYP members on the pub-quiz sub-committee, who put in a solid amount of work leading up to the night with good humour and were impeccably pleasant and efficient on the night. This was a huge undertaking and it came off really well: here’s to the SYP!

29 May 2008

InPrint: News

LBF Seminar 2008

A panaroma shot of the seminar room (Pic: Gurdeep Mattu)

 

The Marlborough Room was packed tighter than the Northern Line at rush hour for the ‘Getting Ahead in UK Publishing’ seminar. Alison Baverstock (Chair) kicked off with a bit of a general knowledge quiz. Unfortunately not one person in the room was able to answer why the date was a special one. Apparently it was the anniversary of the titanic film, I mean disaster. Alison is a senior lecturer on the Publishing MA course at Kingston University. She began her career in publishing before moving into the realms of education and writing. Her first book, How to Market Books is now in its fourth edition and is often referred to as the ‘bible of book marketing’. Alison launched her brand new title, How to Get a Job in Publishing at the end of the seminar.

 

Planning was the first topic touched on in the context of publishing. In other industries, such as finance and the public sector, a considerable amount of time and money is spent on career planning; management training, for example. It was also highlighted that skills gained in publishing, especially in the smaller independents, are varied and transferable. So if you embark on a lowly-paid career in publishing, fear not, you won't be left with no other options if you decide to take your career in a different direction. Options such as literary consultancies, charities and libraries were cited here. Publishing is essentially entrepreneurial, consistently producing a product to match contemporary needs.


The speakers (pic: The Grey Trilby/Toby Rhind-Tutt)
(l to r) Iain Stevenson, Ros Kindersley, Jeremy Trevathan

 

Iain Stevenson opened with a charming anecdote reflecting the sheer overwhelming feeling of awe at events such as the London Book Fair. Iain is Professor of Publishing at University College London (UCL). Iain began his career in 1977 as Publisher for earth sciences, moving to head up Macmillan Reference Books in 1985. He then jointly founded pioneer environmental publisher Belhaven Press, and acquired and ran Leicester University Press concurrently. In 1997, Iain joined the newly privatized Stationery Office as Publishing Director, and has been involved in publishing education since 1999.

 

Iain explained that education in publishing was a fairly new phenomena, since just over 20 years ago Oxford Brookes University opened their doors to the first MAs in publishing. Iain concurred with Alison's previous observation concerning the lack of career planning in publishing, and that at least for now, this is something people working within the industry will have to take into their own hands.

 

Iain submitted that there were three golden rules about 'getting into publishing': First, flexibility. You have to be flexible in publishing, in attitude and skills, and this will make you valuable. A lot of people who start off in say, sales and marketing, might later transfer to the editorial department, or move over to rights management.

 

Second, developing a sense of professionalism. Publishing is an extremely complex business, that's right, a BUSINESS. A business in which profitability is important, and as such you might develop skills in accounts, or better still, you might learn these skills now in preparation for when they are suddenly needed. Familiarise yourself with balance sheets and costings, know what an ISBN is (you don't need to remember what it stands for, but you need to grasp the concept of how they work and why they exist). Develop a suite of professional skills and continue to build on them. The basic skills such as those mentioned above will always be needed, but publishing is an ever-evolving industry filled with intuition and risk, and the best way to sell books and to promote good writing among authors can change over time too.

 

The third rule to keep in mind when approaching a career in publishing, Iain advised, is to develop a network. Socialise; introduce yourself to people working in publishing, get involved with book clubs and societies like the SYP. This is especially important if you were interested in becoming a literary agent, knowing who does what and for who, and being familiar with commissioning editors’ favoured styles and subjects is absolutely vital.

 

The session (Pic: Gurdeep Mattu)

Ros Kindersley, Managing Director of JFL Search & Selection, began her career as a publicist for Quartet Books before joining the Arts Council for a year. She approached JFL for a new publishing job and was instead offered a job as a recruitment consultant by Judy Farquaharson. Following Judy’s retirement, Ros now runs the company, and with the support of her team recruits for all mainstream publishers and a broad range of organisations including charities, NGOs and major corporates.

 

Ros was an english literature graduate in the 80s, and perceived the art of publishing through rose tinted glasses and was shocked to find that although different from many industries in countless ways, ultimately publishing is a business, it has to make money, sell books. Ros dispelled the myth that 20-odd years ago, the majority of people in publishing had a private income. Although she admits that the poor wage at least played a part in her decision to leave her career in publishing to go into business with JFL, Ros says she realised that the aspects of publishing she most enjoyed were still prevalent in this job: like-minded people, the thrill of the chase and negotiating.


Ros went on to share her professional recruitment wisdom, touching on key areas like work experience (it's invaluable - if you can afford to do it, do it, if you can't afford to do it, and you're sick of rejection letters staring at you when you walk through the door every evening, use your annual leave). Network; go to book clubs and events, join the SYP or uni groups that are publishing related. Develop skills (depending on what area of publishing you want to get into, these skills will differ, but as asserted earlier, the more flexible you can make yourself the better). Ensure that your CV is immaculate; ask a friend to proofread it, and highlight your achievements and your unique selling points. If you get to interview stage, always follow up with a 'thank you email'.

 

Jeremy Trevathan, Publishing Director at Macmillan, anchored the meeting. He reinforced what Iain stated earlier about the kind of person you need to be to get on in publishing. Personality goes a long way (as John Travolta once said); intuition and emotion are key factors in the business of publishing, factors that it’s generally advised to put aside in most business contexts. You need to be adaptable, curious and adventurous. You need to be bold enough to submit ideas that are close to your heart, and have the resilience to take the criticism that may follow. You need to be stimulated by having too much to do, and the stamina to cope with it.

 

Jeremy also reinforced the idea that once you have your foot in the door, there's room to maneuver in publishing. He spent a decade in the production department, before taking a demotion to move into the realm of rights for a further 10 years. He then decided that he'd like to give editorial a try, and 8 years in he's happy there, for now.

 

A career in publishing can be extremely flexible. It's easier than a lot of jobs to gain part-time employment, and once you have experience and contacts you can freelance pretty easily. Who you know, and who you're on friendly terms with, can mean a lot. It's a sociable job, so if you don't like socialising, you should probably steer clear of editorial and marketing.

Another shot of the jam-packed session (Pic: Gurdeep Mattu)

 

Q and A [but really just A because I can't recall the Q]

 

· Publishing MAs have a severe shortfall of places compared to the number of applicants, so if you're serious about applying, treat it like a job application.

· If you're thinking about getting a nice well-paid job and then moving across to the joys of publishing, it IS possible, but it'll be easier to deal with the shocking salary expectations earlier rather than later.

· You should expect to spend between 6 and 18 months in a low-level position, and that's if you're assertive.

· It's ok to have a glitch (glitch noun informal 1 a sudden malfunction or irregularity of equipment, 2 an unexpected setback in a plan) on your CV, as long as it's nicely cushioned by some impressive work experience and longevity. Just frame it in positive terms of what you've learned from the experience.

· Don't fear your annual appraisal, use it your advantage! Tell your employers why you are an indispensible member of staff and what you have brought to the company. You have to make your own chances and take the initiative in this business.

· It's useful to know digital techniques, but only learn them if you're willing to use them.

· If you are applying for a job in London and you live outside the capital, it might be an idea to use a friend or relative's address when applying for jobs.

 

Melanie Wilson

22 April 2008

InPrint: News

'Darling, never judge a book by its cover!'

 
Members of the SYP battled an arctic gale on their way to March’s Speaker Meeting on Children’s Publishing at Foyles. Our miserable spirits were defrosted by chocolate and red wine followed by a riveting and entertaining talk from Marks and Hurst.
 
Sean Moss, who had organised the talk, offered a compelling introduction to the pair: Kelly Hurst is currently Editorial Director at Random House Children’s Books. Graham Marks has spent his whole career working in Children’s Publishing and now writes young adult novels alongside being Children’s Editor for Publishing News.
 
Kelly Hurst began the discussion by commenting on the increasing challenges that publishers and booksellers of children’s books are facing: “The average selling price is dropping by five pence a year and with that pushing a title is becoming a more expensive process. Visibility and promotions in bookshops are a costly process.” Kelly added that the most successful authors are the ones who work hard to promote themselves to their readers. Authors such as Terry Pratchett and Jacqueline Wilson have become celebrities by utilising their websites and establishing a brand for themselves. Another cost-saving way to publicise a title is by encouraging the author to get involved with school events as Darren Shan and Robert Muchamore have. It is clear that despite Random House’s growing inclination towards the celebrity autobiography it is children’s books that are Kelly’s main passion: “Celebrity books, such as Katie Price’s autobiography and the upcoming offerings from Geri Halliwell and David Walliams sell exceptionally well in the supermarkets. Book-lovers can be sniffy about Katie,” laughed Kelly, “but they do make money and allow Random House to bid for the books that Random House loves.” One of the biggest worries for Children’s Publishers is complaints from parents about books they deem inappropriate for their kids: “This seems to happen especially with Jacqueline’s books which deal with sensitive, adult issues and yet always seem to fall into the hands of children that are too young,” Kelly mused.
 
Graham Marks started by saying that the five words that chill him are “Celebrity author’s debut children’s novel.” Indeed, publishing children’s books from celebrity authors can be problematic. One only has to point at Fergie’s Budgie the Little Helicopter books (which turned out to be a ‘borrowed’ idea) to find a brilliant example of how publishers can be tripped up by celebs. Although celebrities can bring in excellent revenue for publishers, they can also drain resources for everyone else on the list because of their demands for huge advances. Graham also emphasised: “If you want a children’s book to have staying power you should never include up-to-date trendy ‘stuff’ as it will become a piece of history. Oh yes, kids can be fickle!” A cover can be an anti-sales aid if it gets in the wrong hands, because children DO judge a book by its cover and they will be picky about what they want to read. Graham stressed: “You cannot get a boy to read a book with a pink cover because the response you will get will be ‘I’m not reading that, it’s pink – Duh!’. You must use your common sense.”
 
Graham and Kelly opened up the conversation to the audience with what Graham described as “the whale that resurfaces every five or six years” - that is the introduction of age ranging children’s books. Kelly pointed out that supermarkets advocate the introduction of age range labels because it is hard to match the child to the book. This is especially hard if the book straddles the tricky 9-13 age range. Graham disputed this idea and argued that “Tescos don’t care! They’re product shifters, not booksellers.” Kelly agreed with Graham’s point of view and stated, “It might work with clothes but you can’t be overly prescriptive with books. There is nothing worse.” Kelly nevertheless felt that age ranging would protect authors like Jacqueline Wilson: “One can never second guess complaints. Vicky Angel and Tracy Beaker contain sensitive issues and sometimes swear words that have led to wild accusations of these books allowing children to grow up too fast.” It might just be that age ranging books might prevent this upset. A member of the audience asked how a publisher might go about age ranging the Harry Potter series where readers have grown up with the characters. This question prompted weary, baffled looking faces from our experts who suggested perhaps age-ranging per book. This was followed by more confusion when the adult Potter editions were remembered. Perhaps this just goes to show that one really cannot be prescriptive with age ranging. On that note the talk finished and people trundled out into the elements, to the pub, wondering if they were actually of the wrong age to be Harry Potter lovers…
16 April 2008

InPrint: News

Young Publishing Entrepreneurs - Shortlist Revealed

The British Council and the London Book Fair have announced the shortlist for their second UK Young Publishing Entrepreneur award.
 
The award was launched in 2007, when it was presented to Clare Christian, MD of The Friday Project.
 
The award is open to individuals aged between 25 and 35, working within a publishing house in any capacity. They must demonstrate entrepreneurial skills and the potential to be a future leader in the industry in the UK and internationally. 
 
The shortlist is as follows:
Tom Chalmers, MD of Legend Press
Helen Conford, Editorial Director of Penguin Press
Ed Faulkner, Editorial Director at Virgin Books
Ele Fountain, Senior Commissioning Editor at Bloomsbury
Poppy Hampson, Editor at Chatto and Windus
Emma Hayley, Publising Director of SelfMadeHero
 
The shortlisted candidates will be interviewed by the judging panel on 11th April and the award will be presented at the London Book Fair on 16th April. Together with two runners-up, he or she will win a 10-day trip to Argentina, which will provide an insight into the publishing industry there. The winner will also become part of the British Council’s international network of young creative entrepreneurs and attend the British Book Industry awards in Brighton in May.
 
The winner of the International Young Publishing Entrepreneur award will also be announced on 16th April at the London Book Fair. The winner will be chosen from a shortlist of nine finalists, from locations including Egypt, Slovenia and Yemen.
 
 
03 April 2008

InPrint: News

Goldfish Website Launch

Thursday 13th March 2008 saw the launch of the Goldfish online journal at the Swedenborg Institute in London. When I first heard about it, I naturally assumed that it had something to do with the credit card company, so I wasn’t quite sure why I’d been told about it. But it only took a few minutes’ research online to find out that Goldfish is actually an online repository for compositions from the MA in Creative and Life Writing at Goldsmiths College, University of London.

Since I run my own literary website in my spare time (Authortrek.com), I am always on the Goldfish launch inviteslookout for talented new writers, so I quickly decided that I must attend the launch night. I’d previously been to the Swedenborg Institute for the launch of Legend Press’s second short story anthology, Seven Days. It’s a great place to hold a launch, being well lit with veerings towards neo-classical design that make any reading look classy. Looking at the name badges in the reception area, I was very impressed to see that a variety of literary agents and publishing bods would be attending. I’m naturally quite shy and find it difficult to approach people at such events until after I’ve had a few sips of wine, but there were a few ‘meeters and greeters’ there, such as Amy Sackville, who soon put me at my ease and told me more about the event.

Then it was down to business, as eight writers from the course read from their work. Amy Sackville read an intriguing excerpt from her yet untitled novel about the Artic. Ben Holden had everyone gripped with Mynatour, a poem about a man transformed into a starling. Patrick Hudson revelled in his rich literary voice as he read from his novel, Everybody is the Star of Their Own Movie. There were some extracts from the Life Writing students, which, although they were read well, I wasn’t quite so interested in, as my main focus will always be fiction. Although I’m fairly well-read, this is the first time that I had contact with Life Writing per se, and I couldn’t really see the application for it, aside for some probable cathartic release for the author (all the Life Writing extracts were far too humorous to be considered as Misery Lit!).

Just as I thinking about leaving, Roxanne Bibizadeh discerned my intent and intercepted me. Many writers are self-effacing and too shy to promote their work, so it was refreshing to see so many new authors such as Roxanne ready and willing to endorse their writing, and this self-belief must obviously derive from the tutors at Goldsmiths. Roxanne told me that the extract she had read out was a short story about the widow of a suicide bomber – which surprised me, as I had evidently missed these details. However, the great benefit of attending a website launch was that I could check out her excellent story The Bride of Death online, and not feel so stupid after all when I discovered that the most salient parts of her story had not been in her extract.
All in all, it was a great night. Indeed, I was in the presence of one author when an agent came up to her to congratulate her on her work and to ask her for a submission. That was, after all, the whole purpose of the night. Everyone was having so much fun that hardly anyone wanted to leave for the pub! I also made some great contacts on the night, and will be undoubtedly watching the progress of some of these great writers in the future.

Kevin Mahoney, with photos by Isha Marquez

27 March 2008

InPrint: News

Orange Prize Attacked: A Question of Sexism?

 
Tim Lott, author of Fearless and The Scent of Dried Roses, has labelled the Orange Prize ‘sexist and discriminatory’ and ‘special treatment for a dominant group’.
 
Conceived in 1992 and first announced and awarded (to Helen Dunmore for A Spell of Winter) in May 1996, the prize was intended to counter the perception that ‘the considerable achievements of women novelists were often passed over by the major literary prizes.’ Perhaps the most cited example is the Man Booker Prize – only four of the last fifteen winners have been women, and the female winners of the past two years, Anne Enright and Kiran Desai, broke a five-year run of male victors.
 
Lott’s comments also raise the wider issue of women in publishing – a subject that those starting out in a career in publishing will quickly become aware of. Writing in the Telegraph, he stated ‘Women are predominant, in terms of numbers and power, in most of the major publishing houses and agencies. They sell most of the books, into a market that largely comprises women readers. They are favoured by what is overwhelmingly the most important publishing prize (the Richard and Judy list), and comprise most of the reading group that drive sales.’
 
Obviously conscious of the criticism frequently levelled at the award, the Orange Prize organisers defend themselves in sections on its website that address FAQs such as ‘Why are the prizes only open to/judged by wo men?’ and ‘why aren’t there similar prizes for men?’, and are quick to point out that the prize was set up by ‘a group of men and women involved in publishing – journalists, reviewers, agents, publishers, librarians [and] booksellers’.
 
Novelist A.S. Byatt fuelled the debate, telling the Times that she refuses to allow her publishers to submit her novels for the ‘sexist’ prize.
 
Lott’s comments have been described by some as bitter, but as anyone who works in publishing sees on a daily basis, there is a strikingly high percentage of women working in many areas of publishing, compared to other industries. The ongoing debate about publishing salaries throws interesting light on this issue, with one senior figure famously claiming that publishing is populated by ‘privately-educated Emmas’. Many have expressed concern that low pay, coupled with the ‘London-centricness’ of publishing, is preventing diversity, leaving the job accessible mainly to middle-class, young, white females, whose parents continue supporting them through the first few years of their careers. Others have argued that women are more willing, or ‘better conditioned’ to put up with low pay in return for work they enjoy and are passionate about, and that editing in particular offers a level of flexibility (including the opportunity to freelance) that is appealing to those who plan to have children.
 
Another oft-reported statistic is the discrepancy in literacy rates between girls and boys. Surely the fact that many girls seem to take to reading more readily and find it a more socially acceptable pastime at an early age fuels a passion for books and the written word that is likely to be nurtured over time into the requisite desire to pursue a career in publishing? And given the predominance of women consumers, especially in trade publishing, it is hardly surprising that women, who, it can be perhaps unfairly presumed, have a more instinctual feeling for the market, are desirable employees.
 
Women are increasingly taking on high-profile roles within the publishing industry – famous names include Gail Rebuck, Chair and Chief Executive of the Random House Group, and Ursula Mackenzie, Chief Executive and Publisher of Little, Brown Book Group. However, the fact remains that the proportion of male to females in more junior roles is more heavily biased than in managerial and financial positions.
 
Back in the world of awards, less controversial than the Orange Prize is the lower-profile Kim Scott Walwyn prize, which is administered by Booktrust and awarded to women who demonstrate ‘intellectual rigour, excellence in any area of book publishing and the ability to form and lead creative and innovative publishing teams’. It was set-up to commemorate the life and work of Kim Scott Walwyn, who was a publishing director at Oxford University Press.
 
It seems ironic that it is acceptable to acknowledge women’s achievements within the publishing industry, but not their contributions to the product of that industry. Surely one standard should be applied to all such awards, whatever that standard may be.
 

Returning to the constantly controversial issue of the Orange Prize, in answer to the question of ‘Why isn’t there a similar prize for men?’, the organisers baldly state ‘because no-one has, as yet, put in the time, creativity, effort and enthusiasm necessary to start one up and keep it going.’

Lucy Mitchell

 
 
 
 
26 March 2008

InPrint: News

Speaker Meeting - January 2008, Editorial Trends

The Bearded Tit, that ‘Gut Feeling’ and the Dangerous Lure of Richard and Judy:  Society of Young Publishers Consider the Reality of Publishing in 2008

Sarah Jones reports from the first Speaker Meeting of 2008

Barlow, Schlingmann, Shelley 


SYP members and committee congregated at Foyle’s on Wednesday 27th February to listen to the first talk of an exciting line up of Speaker Meetings for 2008. ‘Publishing Trends: Editorial Forecasting’ was organised by newly appointed Speaker Meeting Representative, Ragna Heidweiller and given by Daniela Schlingmann of Daniela Schlingmann Literary Scouting, Ken Barlow of Ebury Press and David Shelley of Little, Brown’s Sphere imprint. After the usual pre-talk catch ups, a revitalising glass of vino and a charasmatic introduction from Ragna, members settled down to hear from the experts what skills will be required for editorial forecasting at the dawn of 2008.

Shelley tells an anecdote

Schlingmann pinned down what she called the ‘matchmaking’ process of finding, for a particular publisher, a suitable foreign title to purchase for translation. She said: “Finding the right book project is one that requires sharpened skills of perception and awareness that each country has a unique market.” A lot of the decision-making process was guided by what Schlingmann referred to as trusting that ‘gut feeling’. Schlingmann stated: “The ‘gut feeling’ is not something that can be actively learnt, but something a good publisher will develop over time.” Schlingmann also commented on the aggressively competitive relationships that are perceived to exist between fellow literary scouts. She stressed that in the UK this is not the case and literary scouts live in relative harmony. She added, “Only at London Book Fair does the atmosphere get a little more heated!”

Whilst Barlow and Shelley look on intently, did Schlingmann fail to spot something in the corner of the room?

Barlow, who works on non-illustrated non-fiction, stated that a lot of what goes into book publishing is about making snap decisions. He said: “The most important thing is finding a product which stands out. Being objective is important. Being realistic about what is going to sell is essential”. Barlow described how publishing is primarily to do with prioritising: “Identifying and understanding previous successes and failures will help this process”. Barlow elaborated on Schlingmann’s point that each country has its own market: “Some books do not travel well. They might have been a massive success in the US, but not all American books do well in the UK – different cultural values and different ideas about humour. For instance not every country is going to go nuts for The Bearded Tit!” Barlow recommended that above all a good publisher should be proactive and think ahead of their competitors, adding that “It is acceptable to follow external trends, but taking a new spin on it will give your concept more resonance.”

Shelley highlighted that intuition was the key to assessing the potential for a new book. He said: “You can tell when a book is a good idea when you can visualise it as a product. You should be able to see the cover and the blurb in your mind’s eye and imagine the sort of marketing campaign you would use”. He pointed out that the book trade responds to a confident arrival and remarked that self-belief is fundamental. Shelley disputed the current editorial trend for commissioning titles with pound signs and ‘Richard and Judy’s Book Club’ in mind: “The Richard and Judy effect has had a compulsive effect on publishers like Orion who dangerously spent their budget pushing Diane Setterfield’s The Thirteenth Tale based on the conviction it would be chosen for ‘Richard and Judy’s Book Club’ only for it to fail.” Shelley claimed to be a firm advocate in publishing a book for traditional reasons: “Publish a book because it is brilliant!” He also stressed that above all one must keep as sense of proportion: “Failure is part of the game. You have to get back in the saddle and try again.” Lastly Shelley stated that the key to success is to keep a good business head and contests the common misconception that an editor’s job is solely about creativity. He said: “You need more than a love of stories and language. Commercial awareness is mandatory. You must nurture the ability to match figures to your ideas.”

The Society of Young Publishers looks forward to a range of talks from publishing experts over the forthcoming months. After an influx of surprise offerings from the likes of Madonna and Katie Price, the topic for March will be ‘Children’s publishing: The age of the celebrity author?’

 
Sarah Jones is studying MA Publishing at University College London
18 March 2008

InPrint: News

Careers Conference 2007 - Lunchtime Guest of Honour: Gordon Graham

As soon as the panel debate wound up, we welcomed our lunchtime guest of honour, Gordon Graham, Editor Emeritus and Founder of LOGOS, the premier publishing journal, and his wife Betty. Mr Graham kindly hosted his Literature of the Book display, talked to young publishers about LOGOS and his career as a newspaper correspondent in India, a publisher's rep in Asia, International Sales Manager of McGraw-Hill in New York, Managing Director of McGraw-Hill in Europe, and Chairman and CEO of Butterworths. He also signed copies of his own book of essays on international book publishing, As I Was Saying. This highly recommended industry title was sold on the day with all proceeds going to the Kohima Education Trust; the SYP are delighted to report £111.00 was raised for this cause which will aid much-needed education projects in north east India.
 
Delegates were invited to take a free copy of LOGOS, and it is worth mentioning here that Volume 15/4 contains several articles concerning publishing ethics: Ralph Hancox's article 'Publishers as polluters – and what they could do about it' is particularly apt.
 
We would like to thank Gordon and Betty Graham for their attendance and their support of the SYP.
 
25 February 2008

InPrint: News

'It's Going To Be A Big Year!'

 

 

 

Fun was had by all at the 2008 SYP AGM at the Gardening Club in Covent Garden on 16th January. An impressive turnout saw the VIP room packed, and bodes well for the coming year.
 
After enjoying the complimentary wine and snacks, as well as the opportunity to mingle with like-minded enthusiasts, outgoing chair Doug Wallace kicked off the nominations and voting.
 
Ex-Social Secretary Jon Slack was voted in as this year’s Chair and Tori Hunt leaves her role as InPrint Editor to become Vice-Chair. A full list of the new committee will be announced shortly.
 
Jon gave us his views on the coming year: ‘The 2008 Committee is a very passionate and talented group, and we are very excited about the year ahead. Our monthly Speaker Meetings will again bring high-profile guests together to examine the main issues in publishing, and our ambitious events programme will support the SYP's stated aim of hosting relaxed networking occasions, such as the AGM, with the dependable formula of great people and a reliable alcohol supply. Yes indeed… it’s going to be a big year!’
 
After the voting, the merrymaking continued into the night. Free books, courtesy of Continuum, Orion, Random House and John Murray were distributed, and non-members had the chance to join up. There were even some last-minute additions to the extremely popular InPrint and InPrint online sub-committees.
 

New Social Secretary Angie Solomon is sure to have some exciting events lined up, and with three fresh speaker meeting Coordinators, keep your eye on Facebook, the SYP website, and press and publicity emails for upcoming SYP activity.

 

Former Chairs Doug Wallace (L) and Louise Rhind-Tutt (R) (From L-R) Vicki Watson, Chair Jon Slack, former Speaker Meeting extraordinaire Eibhlin Egan, and Adrian Murphy Our Social Secretary Angie Solomon with Membership Supremo Claire Morrison

24 January 2008

InPrint: News

SYP Careers Conference - Alison Baverstock's Ethical Marketing Workshop

Alison Baverstock’s first book How to Market Books, is often referred to as the 'bible of marketing' so we were grateful to her for leading the marketing workshop at the SYP conference. She began by raising the point that it is hard to make the word ethical make sense in this context – is ethical marketing an oxymoron? In many ways perhaps it is – in the world of marketing where departments spend huge sums of money where the benefits or effects are not easily quantifiable.

However Alison argued that in today’s climate where younger generations are growing up increasingly ethically aware, which will in turn lead to a new band of consumers who are more demanding on businesses, no department will be left unaffected.

Alison urged us, as young publishers to take responsibility for this change. She touched on the issue of author treatment, and being respectful and paying fair amounts for work. She also urged us to be discriminating about the kind of books that we actually publish. For example, don’t we have a moral duty to provide quality goods, and to not make assumptions about consumers? (She used the opposite example of the influx of ‘ghost-written’ celebrity biographies that are currently saturating the market and are often pulped after poor sales).

Finally she made the point that in marketing there is often a trade-off between being environmentally friendly and getting the job done. Sometimes an email just won’t suffice so posting flyers is important. What about the waste of paper from the books that don’t sell? The carbon footprint of flying across the world to attend conferences?

Obviously things won’t change overnight but if young publishers can even make the smallest changes to respect authors, respect consumers and respect the environment then the world of publishing will be better for it.

by Kate Hind

21 January 2008

InPrint: News

Careers Conference 2007 - Literary Agent Workshop

In the literary agent workshop, Pat White gave a fascinating insight into the role of a literary agent and their place in the publishing industry today. Entering publishing as a secretary for Simon and Schuster in the late 1950's, Pat moved into their rights department before moving to London where she remains to this day as a director of Rogers, Coleridge and White Ltd looking after the children and illustrated list.

White began the workshop by asking delegates what they thought the role of a literary agent was before giving her own definition - a gatekeeper between author and publisher who is somewhat of a solicitor and a nanny for the author, delivering both good and bad news. Therefore, excellent communication skills are key for any literary agent.

These people skills are paramount, especially when it comes to talking authors through exactly what has been offered in a deal. In doing this, it is important for any agent to establish why a publisher has offered the deal they have although in her experience she has not always found publishers forthcoming with this information.

As well as being a good communicator, White believes that an agent has to have a broad spectrum of knowledge and needs to know aspects of the industry like production and publicity. In agenting, however, people often become specialists and Pat believes that to be an agent one must develop their own sense of taste.

Backing her own tastes is one of the things White loves most about being an agent but told delegates that an agent is basically a sales person with no editorial input and this is why the author-editor relationship is vital as editors spend less and less time on books.
White was also keen to dispel the image of the literary agent as a money-grabbing mercenary, highlighting that often the highest deal offered to an author is not necessarily the right deal and other factors must be taken into account.

In this respect, she described her frustration at the trend for handing out large, unearned advances to authors as when these are not justified and sales do not meet expectations, subsequent smaller advances can greatly damage the author's happiness and an unhappy author is an agent's worst nightmare.

Overall, this workshop gave those in attendance an interesting glimpse of an agent's life and increased their understanding of this oft-misunderstood role.

By Tommy Douglas

21 January 2008

InPrint: News

Careers Conference 2007 - Magazine Publishing Workshop

Leander Reeves began an interesting and entertaining magazine publishing workshop by telling delegates that success in the magazine business was very much dependant on the type of personality each individual possesses. 

With a decade's experience working in the magazine publishing industry and now lecturer in the subject at Oxford Brookes University, Reeves expertise was evident as she gave those in attendance a rundown of magazine publishing today. 

The industry was in good health, she said, highlighting the fact that the majority of British adults still buy a magazine on a regular basis, especially women and those in key demographic areas. These magazines are read on average by 4 people and for 54 minutes each. 

As such, magazines perform several functions for their readers; offering a shared society, sense of belonging whilst also representing a form of tension release. 

To flourish in this industry, Leander told delegates that certain basic skills are required including planning, writing, production, design and the ability to market and promote. 

Therefore, for anyone wishing to enter magazine planning she urged them to see their career like a game of chess, viewing each position or development experience as a move towards a desired goal. 

The best preparation, Reeves suggested, is to develop a personal website and utilise this to build experience as when it comes to looking for employment, magazines look not just for qualifications but proof of what an individual can actually do. 

This is the reason, she insists, that gaining skills in Adobe Illustrator, Adobe Photoshop, Adobe InDesign, QuarkXpress and Dreamweaver are essential for anyone entering the world of magazine publishing so they can cope with the broad spectrum of work this involves. 

Overall, Leander Reeves presented a highly entertaining and informative workshop that provided many valuable insights into magazine publishing whilst giving delegates a clear idea of the requirements for entry into this industry.

By Tommy Douglas

21 January 2008

InPrint: News

Bar Red Taken Over


The SYP Committee arrived recently at London's Trendy Bar Red on Beak Street in style as the wine flowed and various young publishers got talking to existing members of the Committee - with a view to perhaps taking the roles that will be vacated in January.  Angie Solomon from the Committee was the organiser, and by all accounts, much fun was had by all.  Newshound, of course, remains doggedly impartial.

See what I did there?

NH

30 October 2007